Chaos_Theory_and_Modern_Trading
Download
Report
Transcript Chaos_Theory_and_Modern_Trading
By
Paul Cottrell, BSc, MBA, ABD
Author
Complexity Science, Behavioral
Finance, Dynamic Hedging,
Financial Statistics, Chaos
Theory
Proprietary Trader
Energy and Currency
Dissertation
Dynamically Hedging Oil and
Currency Futures Using
Receding Horizontal Control
and Stochastic Programming
The behavior of dynamic systems
Many systems are non-linear
Unpredictable results can occur
Deterministic chaos
Simple chaos where no stochastic functions are in the system
Non-deterministic chaos
Complex Chaos where stochastic function are in the system
Double fulcrum Pendulum
Lorenz System
• Human misbehavior
• Random news events
• Feedback loops
Unknowable
Knowable
Theory of Emergence
Started in cosmology
Big Bang leads to further particle evolution and the
emergence of materials.
Which leads to further complex arrangement
Life
Social Organization
Economic or financial emergence
Economic development
Systemic risk
Contagion
Key takeaway
A complex system can evolve into unpredicted pathways
Complexity Science
The study of complex systems
Using simple rules for agents
Self organizing behavior
Interactions that have a magnifying effect
• The “Market”
• Complex organism
• Self organizing
•Adam’s invisible hand
• Price action
•Asymmetric
• Information
•Asymmetric
• Traders use models
• Models have certain
assumptions on price action
• Models can be used
incorrectly and cause a
system failure
• Lehman Crash
• Flash Crash (Maybe?)
• Account drawdown
• Mass unemployment
• Big Macs too expensive
The Efficient Market Hypothesis
Assumptions
Rational investors
Information cannot be used to make above normal profits
The stochastic variations in returns mean to zero
The market should always be in steady state
Problems
Traders are greedy and not rational
Due to the Dopamine response mechanism
New information is not completely in the price
Profits can be statistically above average for some groups
Stochastic variations in returns can lead to bubbles and bursts.
Fundamental Equilibrium
When price is close to “economic value”
Could be assumed at a 200 moving average on a long
duration chart
Fundamental analysis rule the game
Speculative Equilibrium
When price is above or below “economic value”
Chartists or Quants rule the game
Most assets are in Speculative Equilibrium
Evidence in the 50 period moving average
Has mean reverting characteristics
• Returns graphed
• Daily Returns, Weekly, Monthly
• S&P 500
• Lower Right Graph
• Dow 30
• Monthly
• State Space
• X-axis return (t-1)
• Y-axis return (t)
• Empirical evidence
• That returns are stationary
•In daily returns
• Non-stationary
•At larger time scales.
• Shows emergence of tend
• Ratio to determine level of chaos
• “C” is the return at time (t)
• Ratio = 1
• Pure trending
•Ratio = 0
• Pure Chaos
H < 0.5
mean reversion
H = 0.5
Brownian Motion
H > 0.5
Trending
A possible method to describe the market in terms of smoothness.
Lower “H” value the smoother the surface of the market.
There is trading time and clock time
Clock time is standard time and is constant in velocity
Trading time is changing
Velocity (first derivative) depends on the speed of price
For example:
During high volatile market days price action is higher
Leading to faster time in trade time
Lower volatile days have slow trade time
Many traders use terms like
Rapid price movement or it was a slow trading day
Time is relative to the level of the price change
Can be used to help model discontinuous markets.
Bridge gap with a Brownian motion bridge.
Mandelbrot Time can help frame volatility in terms of delta time.
Similar to space-time bending with gravity.
Trade-time bends with level of price action.
The market is a complex system
Usually in speculative equilibrium
Volatility and correlations are not
constant
Market participants can profit on
average above zero mean
Systems that can monitor the telemetry
of the “market” might be able to
monitor the endogenous risk in the
market (Dragon Kings)
Exogenous risks do exist (Black Swans)
Hedging strategies can, to some degree,
mitigate risk factors.