Transcript Download presentation source

CS 551 / 645:
Introductory Computer Graphics
David Luebke
[email protected]
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~cs551
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Recap: Rendering Pipeline

Almost finished with the rendering pipeline:
–
–
–
–
–

Modeling transformations
Viewing transformations
Projection transformations
Clipping
Scan conversion
We now know everything about how to draw
a polygon on the screen, except visible
surface determination
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Invisible Primitives

Why might a polygon be invisible?
– Polygon outside the field of view
– Polygon is backfacing
– Polygon is occluded by object(s) nearer the
viewpoint


For efficiency reasons, we want to avoid
spending work on polygons invisible for the
first two reasons
For efficiency and correctness reasons, we
need to know when polygons are occluded
David Luebke
7/27/2016
View Frustum Clipping

Remove polygons entirely outside frustum
– Note that this includes polygons “behind” eye
(actually behind near plane)


Pass through polygons
entirely inside frustum
Modify remaining polygons
to pass through portions
intersecting view frustum
– What is the cost of clipping n polygons?
– Can we do better?
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Back-Face Culling


Most objects in scene are typically “solid”
More rigorously: closed, orientable manifolds
– Local neighborhood of all points isomorphic to disc
– Boundary partitions space into interior & exterior

Examples of manifold objects:
– Sphere
– Torus
– Well-formed
CAD part
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Back-Face Culling

Examples of non-manifold objects:
–
–
–
–
–
David Luebke
A single polygon
A terrain or height field
polyhedron w/ missing face
Anything with cracks or holes in boundary
one-polygon thick lampshade:
7/27/2016
Back-Face Culling

On the surface of a closed manifold,
polygons whose normals point away from the
camera are always occluded:
Note: backface culling
alone doesn’t solve the
hidden-surface problem!
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Back-Face Culling

Not rendering backfacing polygons improves
performance
– By how much?
– When in the pipeline should we perform backface
culling?
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Occlusion

For most interesting scenes, some polygons
will overlap:

To render the correct image, we need to
determine which polygons occlude which
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Painter’s Algorithm

Simple approach: render the polygons from
back to front, “painting over” previous polygons:
– Draw blue, then green, then orange

Will this work in the general case?
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Painter’s Algorithm: Problems


Intersecting polygons present a problem
Even non-intersecting polygons can form a
cycle with no valid visibility order:
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Analytic Visibility Algorithms

Early visibility algorithms computed the set of
visible polygon fragments directly, then
rendered the fragments to a display:
– Now known as analytic visibility algorithms
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Analytic Visibility Algorithms

What is the minimum worst-case cost of
computing the fragments for a scene
composed of n polygons?

Answer:
O(n2)
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Analytic Visibility Algorithms


So, for about a decade (late 60s to late 70s)
there was intense interest in finding efficient
algorithms for hidden surface removal
We’ll talk about two:
– Binary Space-Partition (BSP) Trees
– Warnock’s Algorithm
David Luebke
7/27/2016
Binary Space Partition Trees
(1979)

BSP tree: organize all of space (hence
partition) into a binary tree
– Idea: this preprocessing stage will construct a
data structure



Can be queried for a given viewpoint
Returns an ordered list of polygons or fragments
These can be drawn with the painter’s algorithm!
– Each node in the tree corresponds to a splitting
plane which divides a region of space into two
half-spaces
David Luebke
7/27/2016
BSP Tree Construction


Split along the plane containing any polygon
Classify all polygons into positive or negative
half-space of the plane
– If a polygon intersects plane, split it into two


Recurse down the negative half-space
Recurse down the positive half-space
David Luebke
7/27/2016
BSP Tree Traversal

Query: given a viewpoint, produce an ordered list of
(possibly split) polygons from back to front:
BSPnode::Draw(Vec3 viewpt)
Classify viewpt: in + or - half-space of node->plane?
/* Call that the “near” half-space */
farchild->draw(viewpt);
render node->polygon; /* always on node->plane */
nearchild->draw(viewpt);

Intuitively: at each partition, draw the stuff on the
farther side, then the polygon on the partition, then
the stuff on the nearer side
David Luebke
7/27/2016
BSP Demo

Really cool demo:
http://symbolcraft.com/pjl/graphics/bsp
David Luebke
7/27/2016
BSP Trees


What are the worst-case storage
requirements of a BSP tree?
What is the expected cost of a single query
for a given viewpoint?
David Luebke
7/27/2016
BSP Trees

Pros:
– Simple, elegant scheme
– Only writes to framebuffer (i.e., painters algorithm)


Thus very popular for video games (but getting less so)
Cons:
– Computationally intense preprocess stage restricts
algorithm to static scenes
– Worst-case time to construct tree: O(n3)
– Splitting increases polygon count

David Luebke
Again, O(n3) worst case
7/27/2016