Transcript https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/11-12-0904-00-0000-802-11-review-of-july-2012-proposed-pars.pptx

July 2012
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0904r0
802.11 Review of July 2012 Proposed Pars
Date: 2012-07-16
Authors:
Name
Affiliations
Address
Jon Rosdahl
CSR
10871 N 5750 W
801-492-4023
Highland, UT 84003
Submission
Slide 1
Phone
email
[email protected]
Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2012
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0904r0
Abstract
This slide contains the review of the PARS that were
under consideration for the 2012 July Plenary in San
Diego.
Submission
Slide 2
Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2012
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0904r0
PARs under consideration
July 15-20, 2012, San Diego, CA USA
1. 802.16q, amendment for multi-tier networks, PAR and
5C
2. 802.16.3, new standard for mobile broadband network
performance measurements, PAR and 5C
3. 802.3bm, amendment for 40 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s
Operation Over Fiber Optic Cables, PAR and 5C
4. 802.3bn, amendment for Ethernet Passive Optical
Networks Protocol over Coax Networks, PAR and 5C
5. 802.11aj, amendment for Enhancements for Very High
Throughput to support one or more of the Chinese 40-50
GHz and 59-64 GHz frequency bands, PAR and 5C
Submission
Slide 3
Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2012
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0904r0
1. 802.16q, amendment for multi-tier networks,
PAR and 5C
• In 8.1 an item number is required when adding an
extra explanation : “(Item number and Explanation)”
• The statement is not really an Explanation of any item,
but rather a statement of an additional requirement
that could be part of the Scope of the project statement.
This may also be addressed in the 5C similar to how
802.16 responded in that case about conformance in
802.16.3.
Submission
Slide 4
Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2012
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0904r0
2. 802.16.3, new standard for mobile broadband network
performance measurements, PAR and 5C
“Mobile Broadband Network Performance Measurements”
• 4.2 or 4.3 may have an incorrect date – general rule of
thumb is that it takes about 6 months for the fastest
start of Sponsor Ballot to submittal to RevCom...
• Spell out first use of acronyms in 8.1 – IETF, ITU-T,
lmap…
• In 5C -3 please add the “(a)” and “(b)” to indicate the
response to the specific questions (similar to what was
done in 16q).
Submission
Slide 5
Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2012
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0904r0
3. 802.3bm, amendment for 40 Gb/s and 100 Gb/s
Operation Over Fiber Optic Cables, PAR and 5C
• The 5C that was used is not the currently approved set
of 5Cs that are required by 802 EC OM (see 11.5.2).
Please update and respond accordingly.
• The title of the PAR and the 5C is different… The 5C
document does not reference the PAR. Some note to tie
the two together should be made.
• In response to page 11 of the 5C document:
Submission
Slide 6
Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2012
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0904r0
4. 802.3bn, amendment for Ethernet Passive Optical
Networks Protocol over Coax Networks, PAR and 5C
• 8.1 please add an item number reference for the
statement for which the acronym definition is being
given.
• The title in the 5C seemed a bit different than the PAR
title. Should it be Coax or Coax Networks?
• The 5c does not actually reference the PAR.
• In the 5C – Economic Feasibility:
– What is OLT and CNU?
• The 5C that was used is not the currently approved set
of 5Cs that are required by 802 EC OM (see 11.5.2).
Please update and respond accordingly.
Submission
Slide 7
Jon Rosdahl (CSR)
July 2012
doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/0904r0
5. 802.11aj, amendment for Enhancements for Very High
Throughput to support one or more of the Chinese 40-50
GHz and 59-64 GHz frequency bands, PAR and 5C
• PAR Group did not take formal action on this PAR
and 5c.
Submission
Slide 8
Jon Rosdahl (CSR)