Transcript link
GATT/WTO SYSTEM AND THE
PROTECTION OF NON-TRADE VALUES
Text of article XX:
See the WTO website
http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/leg
al_e/gatt47_02_e.htm#articleXX
GATT/WTO SYSTEM AND THE PROTECTION
OF NON-TRADE VALUES
Article XX : general exceptions from free trade
protection of public interests and of State
sovereignty
Sanitary and Phitosanitary Agreement and
Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade are a
dev't of article XX
the meaning of art.XX is qualified by
jurisprudence
evolutionary interpretation
The Tuna-Dolphin cases
import ban by the US because nets used in
order to fish tuna accidentally catch dolphins
violation of art.XI and justification by art.XX b)
extraterritoriality: indirect modification of WTO
members' law
PPMs issue : process and production methods:
can i distinguish products on the basis of the
way they are processed?
The Tuna-dolphin cases
the measure is refused : the measure is
not “necessary”
GATT accused to be not favorable to
env'tal protection
a second panel created about the same
problem does not rule out the possibility
of extraterritorial measures
The LTRAT and the necessity principle
some paragraphs of article XX use the term
“necessary”
necessity is a principle of int'l law : a measure
is not stronger than necessary to achieve its
aim
a measure is illegal if there are other measures
less restrictive and equally effective to reach
that aim
The LTRAT and the necessity principle
LTRAT= least trade restrictive alternative
test
heavy burden of proof on the State
invoking art.XX
alternative measures are easy to find but
often more expensive
art.XX is an exception= restrictive
interpretation
The LTRAT and the necessity principle
example: Thailand cigarettes
import ban on cigarettes for public health
reasons
the measure is not necessary:
- less restrictive alternatives (training
programs)
- no internal measures = discrimination
The weighing and balancing test
in the light of the critics need to refine the
LTRAT
Korea-Beef (2000): imported and
domestic meat are sold in different shops
Korea invokes art.XX d): protection of
consumers
inspiration from EU jurisprudence
The weighing and balancing test
assessing the necessity of a measure
implies the application of 3 criteria :
- importance of the aim
- effectiveness of the measure
- trade restriction
The weighing and balancing test
risk to apply the test differently according
to the dispute
ex. France - ban on asbestos products
the aim is of the highest importance
the measure is indispensable
trade restrictiveness is not assessed
The weighing and balancing test
problems of the test:
- are some interests more important than
others?
- the third criterion implies a balancing of
the aim with trade interests
- in principle WTO cannot put into
discussion members' level of protection
of public goods
The chapeau
applied after the paragraphs
it deals with the way the measure is
implemented
prevention of abuse of right
striking a balance between the rights of
the State imposing the measure and the
right of other States to free trade
The chapeau
ex. US-Shrimps
- import ban on shrimps fished without a
turtle excluding device
- the measure falls under art.XX g) but it
violates the chapeaux
- non transparent, unilateral and
discriminatory process
Article XX and the precautionary
principle
Brasilian tyres : unlikely cause-effect
chain between the use of retreated tyres
and the spread of diseases
precautionary reasoning of the AB
application of the chapeau : decision by
another judicial organ does not justify
discrimination
Recent art.XX cases
EU-ban on seal meat and products
- exception for Inuit traditional production
- seals are an endangered species
- integral part of indigenous lifestyle
case dealt with by the EU court
ECHR and IACHR case-law
possible application of art.XX g)
Recent art.XX cases
Korea-imports of bovine meat from
Canada (panel stage) : fear of BSE
the ban can only be lifted by Korean
assembly
EU-poultry meat from US: ban on any
chemical product other than water
various EU agencies issued reports
according to which there's no real risk
China-raw materials
export ban of raw materials supported by:
- sovereignty over natural resources
- need to protect and manage raw
materials
- DCs right to preserve resources for their
economic dev't
art.XX cannot be used for violations of
accession protocols
China-raw materials
art.XX g): general principles
is the measure related to...? no conflict
between sovereignty, sustainable dev't
and trade liberalisation
is the measure adopted in conjunction
with...? even-handedness
China-raw materials
art. XX g) : application
is the measure related to..? NO
- it would make more sense to limit extraction and
not exports
- long-term effects on the downstream sector
(subsidy)
- why a quota and not a duty? the link with the
aim is not clear
China-raw materials
is the measure adopted in conjunction
with...? NO
- long list of domestic conservation
measures but their actual effect is not
clear
is the measure even-handed? NO
- the import ban and the production cap do
not have an even impact on
importers/exporters
China-raw materials
art.XX par. b) supported by:
- production from scrap products is less
polluting
- export duties make sure there is a stable
supply of scraps
- restrictions on primary production reduce
pollution
China-raw materials
restrictions on primary products
- the measure does not fall under par.b) because
the real aim is economic
- contribution to the aim
export restrictions = reduced production and
pollution?
unreliable dataset
upstream-downstream interactions not accounted
for
China-raw materials
selection effect?
link between export restrictions on raw materials
and production of value-added goods?
env'tal Kuznets curve
- trade restrictiveness
China able to affect world prices
entry of new and more efficient competitors
uncertain
China-raw materials
- existence of alternatives
improved technology to reduce the level of
pollution
recycling of consumer goods
increased env'l standards
China says there are already in place/they do not
work
the panel disagrees: China policy do not include
these measures and those in place do not work
China-raw materials
restrictions on scrap products
scrap = less pollution?
export restrictions necessary to enhance
recycling?
reducing scrap price can also reduce the
incentive to collect it
- the are alternatives
CHINA IS IN BREACH