Honor Board Training Examples

Download Report

Transcript Honor Board Training Examples

Unified Code of Graduate Student
Conduct Honor Pool Training
Examples
Office of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies
Tulane University
Example #1
• Richard is writing a research paper for his history research
seminar. While reading for his project, he finds a passage in
Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States that
perfectly states the idea he is trying to get across. Richard
reads the passage carefully, and decides to paraphrase it by
putting the idea in his own words. Because the writing is his
own, and he already had the idea before he accessed the
book, he feels that he does not have to cite the Zinn in his
paper.
• Would this be considered a violation of the Honor Code?
• If so, what should Richard have done differently?
Adapted from Rice University Honor Council Orientation,
http://honor.blogs.rice.edu/files/2012/08/Rice-University2.pdf
Example #2
• Christina has a take home examination for a graduatelevel chemistry class, and has two hours to complete
the assessment. Christina chooses to take her exam in
her apartment; however, in the course of completing
her test, she loses track of time and accidentally
continues to work on her test 15 minutes longer than
the allotted time. Since it is a take home test, and it
was an honest mistake, Christina decides to say
nothing about the incident.
• Did Christina violate the Honor Code?
• If so, what could she have done differently?
Adapted from Rice University Honor Council Orientation,
http://honor.blogs.rice.edu/files/2012/08/Rice-University2.pdf
Example #3
• Henry is struggling to finish a finance term paper the night
before it is due. In the course of his frenzied work, he
comes across a quotation for which he forgot to record the
proper source. Because he is flustered and only has a few
hours to finish his assignment, Henry attributes the
quotation to a book and author that he had previously
referenced, but from which the quotation did not originate.
He assigns the quote a random page number. Because the
quote did come from a source, Henry did acknowledge that
the words were not his own, and cited a source that does
exist, he does not believe he has violated the Honor Code.
• Did Henry violate the Honor Code?
• If so, what could he have done differently?
Adapted from Rice University Honor Council Orientation,
http://honor.blogs.rice.edu/files/2012/08/Rice-University2.pdf
Example #4
• Megan, a graduate student, and her roommate Leah, a senior, are
in the same cross-listed introductory graduate-level mathematics
class. One evening, the graduate students in the class are assigned
to complete a closed book, closed note take home quiz on
Blackboard that Leah does not have to complete. Leah notices her
roommate open the tab for the quiz, and subsequently take out her
textbook. Megan flips through pages, and obviously references the
book throughout the course of the assessment. Not wanting to ruin
her friendship or make her living situation awkward, Leah says and
does nothing even though she is aware of the fact that her
roommate has violated the Honor Code.
• Is Leah in violation of the Honor Code? Is Megan?
• If so, what should either one have done differently?
Adapted from Rice University Honor Council Orientation,
http://honor.blogs.rice.edu/files/2012/08/Rice-University2.pdf
Example #5
• Craig and Jake are graduate student in the same biomedical
research group, both taking thesis/research for credit this term.
Because their work is so inter-related, it is common for them to
collect data, take notes, and complete their experiments together.
Their advisor, Prof. Smith, is very clear that their end-of-semester
research reports for a thesis/research grade should be their own
work, no matter how much they have collaborated on their
projects. The two students work together appropriately in the
completion of the experiments. When it comes time for them to
craft their independent reports, they decide to sit at the same table
in HowieT, so they can ask each other questions if any arise. As they
work on their reports, they exchange a few ideas about the project
that ultimately end up in both reports.
• Did Craig and Jake violate the Honor Code?
• If so, what could they have done differently?
Adapted from Rice University Honor Council Orientation,
http://honor.blogs.rice.edu/files/2012/08/Rice-University2.pdf
Example #6
•
•
•
Jennifer’s thesis advisor, Prof. Jones, asks her for some preliminary data and
analysis for an NSF proposal she is preparing. Jennifer willingly provides the
information and is provided a copy of the final proposal by her advisor. Six months
later, Jennifer successfully defends her thesis, and the appropriate paperwork is
signed by her advisor and committee including the thesis and thesis abstract
pages. Jennifer immediately finds an entry-level tenure-track position at a
prominent university. One month after Jennifer has started work, Prof. Jones
begins preparing another NSF proposal and consults Jennifer’s published thesis.
Her advisor had not read the thesis prior to Jennifer’s defense presuming that as
advisor she already knew what was in it. No committee members objected to the
thesis or the presentation at the time of its defense. Upon review, Prof. Jones finds
that the vast majority of the thesis is very similar to the original NSF proposal she
submitted. Although some of the data and analysis are clearly Jennifer’s, a
disturbing amount of additional information and analysis are from Prof. Jones’
original proposal, although some wording has been changed slightly, but without
reference to the proposal. Prof. Jones wishes to pursue an Honor Code violation
for Jennifer and have her degree revoked.
Did Jennifer violate the Honor Code?
If so, what could she have done differently?