Analytical Delay and Variation Modeling for Subthreshold Circuits

Download Report

Transcript Analytical Delay and Variation Modeling for Subthreshold Circuits

Analytical Delay and Variation Modeling
for Subthreshold Circuits
Sungil Kim and Vishwani D. Agrawal
Auburn University
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
{szk0075, agrawvd}@auburn.edu
3/2/2016
Constraint on Power in Modern Electronics
Ultra Small
Computer / Imager
Biomedical Sensor
/Monitoring Device
Portable / Wearable
Device
For Low to Moderate Speed Systems:
Power Consumption / Management >>> Performance
2
Supply Voltage VDD vs. Power
PTM 16-nm LP
Vth = 0.68V
Ptotal∝ VDD2
Drawback:
PVT Variations
- Process
- Voltage
- Temperature
3
Scaling Down VDD Below Vth
Idea of Subthreshold Circuits: 1971 (Meindl and Swanson)
Workability: 1900s – 2000s (Chandrakasan, Blaauw, Sylvester…)
Minimum Energy
PTM 16-nm LP
Vth = 0.68V
4
VDD Scaling Trend
ADC: limits exist on VDD scaling, but trend is downward
5
VDD Scaling from ISSCC Analog Trend
6
Necessity of Delay Model and Challenges
• Accurate delay model => better predict circuit behavior
• Set the operating region and process corners
— essential for extreme environments
— military applications (extreme temperature)
• Used for timing analysis and VLSI design stage
• Subthreshold Circuits pose challenges
— susceptible to PVT (process, voltage, temp) variations
— Isat exponentially depends on gate, threshold voltage
— reduced Ion / Ioff => Alpha-power model is no longer accurate
New delay model for the subthreshold is needed.
7
Review of Alpha-Power MOSFET Model
T. Sakurai and A. Richard Newton
8
Previous Research Overview
0 —> 1 Input
F. Frustaci, P. Corsonello, and S. Perri, “Analytical delay model considering variability effects in
subthreshold domain,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 168–172, 2012.
9
Proposed Subthreshold Delay Model
0 —> 1 Input
10
Parameter Extraction for Alpha-Power MOSFET Model
11
Alpha-Power Delay Model in Subthreshold Region
PTM 45-nm LP
Proposed:
Avg. Error ≈ 15%
Max. Error ≈ 25%
Alpha-Power
Avg. Error ≈ 21%
Max. Error ≈ 83%
0 —> 1 Input
12
Alpha-Power Delay Model in Subthreshold Region
PTM 45-nm LP
Alpha-Power
Max. Error ≈ 466%
1 —> 0 Input
Proposed
Max. Error ≈ 77%
13
Simulation Results
PTM 16-nm LP
Error
Alpha-power
(red)
Proposed
(green)
Average
39.8%
16.5%
Worst
71.1%
33.4%
14
Novelty of Proposed Models
Delay Model
• Verify alpha-power MOSFET model in the subthrehsold region
• Show ~83% (0->1 input) and ~466% (1->0 input) error by
simulating with PTM 45-nm LP model
• Unlike some of the previous models, consider DIBL effect
Variations Model
• Unlike some of the previous models, consider DIBL effect
• Adding compensation factors to increase the accuracy
• Simulate the proposed models over broader ranges of VDD
• Verify on smaller technology node (16-nm) that potentially have
more variations than 130-nm or 45-nm models
15
Proposed Voltage Variation Model
Compensation Factor
16
Proposed Model Result (1): VDD Variation
PTM 16-nm LP
Avg. Error = 14.6%, Max. Error = 79.1%
17
Proposed Temperature Variation Model
Compensation Factor
18
Proposed Model Result (2): Temp Variation
PTM 16-nm LP
Avg. Error = 6.8%, Max. Error = 37.9%
19
Proposed Process Variation Model
Mainly due to threshold voltage (Vth) variation
20
Proposed Model Result (3): Vth Variation
PTM 16-nm LP
Monte Carlo 1000 runs
Avg. Error = 1%, Max. Error = 6%
21
Effect of Compensation Factor
Carefully chosen from the results of previous research
Error
VDD Variation
Temp Variation
without
with factor
without
with factor
Average
27.4%
14.6%
62.1%
6.8%
Best
0.4%
0.1%
20.2%
0.1%
Worst
131.7%
79.1%
87.5%
37.9%
T. Lin, K.-S. Chong, B.-H. Gwee, J. S. Chang, and Z.-X. Qiu, “Analytical delay variation modelling for
evaluating sub-threshold synchronous/asynchronous designs,” in Proc. IEEE Int. NEWCAS,
Jun. 20–23, 2010, pp. 69–72.
22
Summary
• Reviewed power-constrained electronics
• Explored subthreshold circuit and its advantages
• Analyzed alpha-power law MOSFET model
• Review current state-of-the-art analytical delay model
• Verified delay model via simulation on PTM 45-nm / 16-nm
• Proposed delay variations models
— process variation (Vth)
— voltage variation (VDD)
— temperature variation
• Verified models via simulation on PTM 16-nm LP technology
— up to 4.31×, 1.29×, and 1.88× PVT variations
23
Questions?
Thank you!