L1527anion.ppt
Download
Report
Transcript L1527anion.ppt
Modeling Anions in L1527
Nanase Harada
Eric Herbst
The Ohio State University
Molecular Spectroscopy Meeting 2008
Columbus OH
Overview
L1527 and its Chemistry
Species and Reactions in Gas-Phase Anion Model
Results from Anion Model
Comparison with Observation
Anion-to-Neutral Ratio
Carbon Chain Abundances
Variation of Initial Conditions
Conclusion
L1527 and its Chemistry
Low-mass star-forming region with a class 0/I Protostar
T=30K
Unsaturated carbon-chain molecules were detected
(Sakai et al. 2008)
C4H, C4H2, HC7N, HC9N, etc…
Possible scenarios
Evaporation of precursor methane from grains
Cold remnants
Detection of two negative ions
C4H-, C6H-
Anion Model in OSU Gas Phase Code
In addition to osu_01_2007 gas phase code,
Families of CnH-, Cn-, and C3N Radiative electron attachment (Cn + e- -> Cn- + hν )
Photodetachment (Cn- + hν -> Cn + e-)
Dissociative attachment
(HNCCC + e- -> C3N- + H)
Associative detachment (Cn- + C -> Cn+1 + e-)
Anion-neutral reactions ( CnH- + O -> Cn-1H- + CO)
Mutual neutralization (CnH- + Na+ -> CnH + Na)
Initial Conditions
Start mostly in molecular
form
Lower initial metal
abundances –depletion
to grains based on the
warm-up model (Hassel
et al. 2008)
T=30K, n0=106cm-3
species
ni/nH
Species
ni/nH
H2
0.5
HCN
3x10-9
He
6x10-2
HNC
3x10-9
CO
5x10-5
H2 S
1x10-9
CH4
3x10-6
NH3
1x10-8
N2
1x10-5
S
1x10-8
H3 +
6x10-11
S+
1x10-
Fe+
1x10-11
HCO+
2x10-9
11
Results: Anion Abundance,
Anion-to-Neutral Ratio
A factor of few difference for
[C6H-]/[C6H]
A few orders of magnitude
difference for [C4H-]/[C4H]
Anion abundance can be even
higher than electron abundance
Results : Carbon-Chain Abundances
Solid lines – Model with Anions
Dotted lines – Model without Anions
Higher abundances for
longer carbon-chain after
105yrs.
With anions, less
abundance for CnH, more
abundance for CnH2,
HCnN
Results : Reactions
Without Anions
C6
C6H2
C6H
C6Hm+
With Anions
C6
C6-
C6H
C7H
C6H-
C6H2
C6H2+
HC7N
Comparison to the Observation
19 out of 23 species within an order of
magnitude, 14 species within factor of 3
agreement
Large disagreement for C4H-, order of
magnitude difference for C6H- at the optimal
time
Confidence level method (Garrod et al. 2006)
i erfc(
| log( X i ) log( X i ,obs ) |
2
)
κ=0.63 – factor 3
κ=0.32 – factor 5
Our result has the average of slightly better than factor of 3 agreement.
Variation of Initial Abundances
CH4 abundance
Initial
CH4
Confidence
Level
Optimal
Time (yrs)
Number of
Species in
Agreement
3(-07)
0.601
8800
18
1(-06)
0.642
6500
18
3(-06)
0.652
4800
18
1(-05)
0.652
4300
19
3(-05)
0.647
4300
19
This agrees with methane evaporation scenario.
Conclusion
The observed species are reproduced with best
agreement around 5x103 yr.
The anion model causes very high synthetic
power.
Anion-to-neutral ratios are higher than the
observation. The radiative electron attachment
rate should be re-examined.
The anion model also needs more investigation
(extension of model, calculation of rates, etc).
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank…
Nami Sakai and Satoshi Yamamoto
George Hassel
All of you