Transcript HMT.pptx

HIGH RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY
OF HEXAMETHYLENETETRAMINE
(HMT) C6N4H12
V. BOUDON,
Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, UMR 5209 CNRS-Université de Bourgogne, 9. Av. A. Savary, BP 47870, F-21078
Dijon Cedex, France
O. PIRALI,
Ligne AILES – Synchrotron SOLEIL, L’Orme des Merisiers, F-91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France and Institut des Sciences Moléculaires
d’Orsay, UMR 8214 CNRS-Université Paris-Sud, Bât. 210, 91405, Orsay Cedex, France
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
Contents
I.
The HMT molecule
II. IR spectroscopy at SOLEIL
III. Theoretical model
IV. Band analyses and simulations
V.
Conclusions and perspectives
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
I. The HMT molecule
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
Hexamethylenetetramine (HMT)
HTM is similar to adamantane1 (C10H16) with four C–H groups
substituted by N atoms
Td (tetrahedral) symmetry
25 normal modes:
Vapor pressure @ 296 K ≤ 7 μbar
1See
ν1 to ν4:
A1 (Raman)
ν5:
A2 (Inactive)
ν6 to ν10:
E (Raman)
ν11 to ν16:
F1 (Inactive)
ν17 to ν25:
F2 (IR / Raman)
O. Pirali, V. Boudon, J. Oomens and M. Vervloet, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 024310 (2012)
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
II. IR spectroscopy at SOLEIL
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
AILES beamline at SOLEIL
High Resolution Absorption Spectroscopy in the Far-IR
Interferometer
Synchrotron
beam
entrance
Multipass cell :
Max = 200m
Bolometer
detectors
Maximum spectral resolution = 0.001 cm-1
Spectral range= 7-1000 cm-1
Multipass White cell: L = 151.748 m
Ambiant temperature (T = 296 K)
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
III. Theoretical model
H Pk  

all indexes
 v  v '  K ,n 
  v  v '   (A1g )
tsKs,n

R

Vss ' 
'

67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
Theoretical model – Tensorial formalism
Systematic expansion of effective Hamiltonian and transition
moment up to any order and for any polyad scheme, thanks to
group theory and tensorial methods
H Pk  

all indexes
 v  v '  K ,n 
  v  v '  
tsKs,n

R

Vss ' 
'

Parameters
Rotation
(A1g )
Vibration
 All interactions are automatically included
 Vibrational extrapolation
 Global analyses
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
IV. Band analyses and simulations
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
The 670 cm–1 band (ν24)
2470 assignments, Jmax = 119
dRMS = 0.353 × 10–3 cm–1
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
The 1015 cm–1 band (ν22)
4904 assignments, Jmax = 90
dRMS = 0.357 × 10–3 cm–1
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
The 1015 cm–1 band (ν22) : P branch detail
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
The 1015 cm–1 band (ν22): rovibrational levels
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
The 1241 cm–1 band (ν21)
3411 assignments, , Jmax = 82
dRMS = 0.371 × 10–3 cm–1
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
The 1362 cm–1 band (ν20)
2623 assignments, Jmax = 70
dRMS = 0.442 × 10–3 cm–1
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
The 1462 cm–1 band (ν19)
1224 assignments, Jmax = 86
dRMS = 0.698 × 10–3 cm–1
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
IV. Conclusions and perspectives
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
Problems with the 820 cm–1 band (ν23)
This band looks simple, but resists to analysis! Nearby perturbator?
• P and R clusters deploy in
oposite directions
• Strange “comb” Q branch
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
Perspectives: HMT
in interstellar space
and comets?
http://www.astrochem.org/sci/Hexamethylenetetramine.php
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012
Perspectives: HMT on Titan?
In a paper submitted to Icarus, C. He, G. Lin, A. Smith, (2012)
“NMR Identification of Hexamethylenetetramine and Its
Precursor in Titan Tholins: Implications for Titan Prebiotic
Chemistry”, HMT appears to the main species arising from tholin
synthsesis:
This scheme makes sense, since méthanimine (H2C=NH) was:
1. Observed in situ (ion mass spectroscopy, Yelle et al. FD 147 2010)
2. Observed in lab plasmas of N2-CH4 (Carrasco et al. 2012, Icarus)
67th Ohio State University Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy • June 18–22, 2012