Transcript VNCO.ppt

Dynamic Rotational Spectroscopy of Vinyl
Isocyanate: IR-Chirped-Pulse Fourier Transform
Microwave Double Resonance
Gordon G. Brown, Justin L. Neill, Steven T.
Shipman, and Brooks H. Pate
University of Virginia
Department of Chemistry
Vinyl Isocyanate Torsional Potential
E of laser
= 3000-3200 cm-1
Delocalized
torsional
wavefunctions
Localized
torsional
wavefunctions
Ground State Parameters
Species
trans
cis
Preda
Expb
Preda
Expb
A (MHz)
65195.93
62584.051
22484.09
20146.8
B (MHz)
2390.11
2437.730
2909.83
3017.267
C (MHz)
2305.58
2346.507
2576.40
2689.513
a (D)
1.99
2.35
b (D)
0.87
0.27
aa (MHz)
2.92
2.63c
2.73
bb (MHz)
-1.59
-1.49c
-1.35
Barrier to
isomerization (cm-1)
577.2
aCalculated
401.6
with Gaussian 03 using b3lyp/6-31++g(d,p).
constants from C. Kirby and H.W. Kroto. J. Mol. Spec., 70, 216-228 (1978).
cFit from CP-FTMW data using SPFIT.
bRotational
Experimental Procedure
• Find laser absorption using a Balle-Flygare cavity
-Use Gaussian 03W predicted and experimental dipole derivative directions to aid
in interpretation
• Observe upper state rotational spectra on a chirped-pulse Fourier transform
microwave spectrometer
-Intensity distribution and upper state hyperfine patterns (if resolved) provide information
about the geometry of the upper state
• Why vinyl isocyanate?
-Barrier much lower than previous DRS studies (cyclopropanecarboxaldehyde, allyl
cyanide, methyl vinyl ether)
-The possibility exists of creating an asymmetric gyroscope (where internal angular
momentum is generated), rather than simply observing coalescence
0.02 cm-1
IR-FTMW Double Resonance Spectrum
anharmonic
starred—fundamentals
unstarred—combination bands
Band Contour—a-type
R(2)
Monitor 202101 trans
P(2)
P(1)
R(1)
Contour assumes no change in rotational constants upon vibrational excitation;
fits well because B and C rotational constants do not change significantly compared
to the laser bandwidth (~600 MHz)
Band Contour—a-b hybrid
A
B
Misses on the band contour of
the b component because the A
rotational constant can change
drastically with a small
geometry shift due to vibrational
excitation;
Band Contour—a-b hybrid
A
Misses on the band contour of
the b component because the A
rotational constant can change
drastically with a small
geometry shift due to vibrational
excitation;
B
Fits with a vibrationally averaged
A constant in the upper state
of 60.7 GHz
 A  B
:
 1 : 1.9
q
q
2
2
GSD Band Summary
Experimental Intensities
Calculated Intensities
BO (cm-1)
A (mV)
B (mV)
3164.42
41
0
3153.25
10
0
3132.10
14
26
3114.29
38
0
3100.52
9
0
3099.25
6
0
3092.88
10
0
3088-3091
?
3056.95
3047.10
Fundamental (cm-1)
A (km/mol)
B (km/mol)
3130.23 (C-H str)
1.16
2.99
3040.30 (C-H str)
0.85
1.00
2999.16 (C-H str)
4.54
8.12
2305.21 (N=C=O str)
1525.68
10.36
1671.91 (C=C bend)
158.26
0.00
Combination band (cm-1)
Strong Normal Mode
Contributor
?
3173.15
C=C bend
3
6
3169.93
N=C=O str
1
1
3093.56
C=C bend
3007.83
N=C=O str
b3lyp/6-31g++(d,p) anharmonic (rediagonalized with
cubic force constants)
GSD Band Summary
Experimental Intensities
Calculated Intensities
BO (cm-1)
A (mV)
B (mV)
3164.42
41
0
3153.25
10
0
3132.10
14
26
3114.29
38
0
3100.52
9
0
3099.25
6
0
3092.88
10
0
3088-3091
?
3056.95
3047.10
Fundamental (cm-1)
A (km/mol)
B (km/mol)
3130.23 (C-H str)
1.16
2.99
3040.30 (C-H str)
0.85
1.00
2999.16 (C-H str)
4.54
8.12
2305.21 (N=C=O str)
1525.68
10.36
1671.91 (C=C bend)
158.26
0.00
Combination band (cm-1)
Strong Normal Mode
Contributor
?
3173.15
C=C bend
3
6
3169.93
N=C=O str
1
1
3093.56
C=C bend
3007.83
N=C=O str
b3lyp/6-31g++(d,p) anharmonic (rediagonalized with
cubic force constants)
Chirped Pulse Fourier Transform Microwave
Spectrometer
10 GHz Bandwidth
9-19 GHz
1-11 GHz
12 GHz Oscilloscope
Ground State Rotational Spectrum
cis pure rotational signal
trans 303202
~300 times weaker
than trans
cis 202101
trans 202101
cis 303202
Ground State Hyperfine Structure (trans)
212111
32
F'F''
202101
21
21
32
10
F'F''
11
22
11
10
12
22
211110
3164 cm-1 band
Monitor 202101
R(1)
Laser pumps
all three J = 21 a-type
transitions at once;
population in 101 of GS
is much greater than
that in 111 or 110, so
most of excited population
is in 202
3164 cm-1 band: Hyperfine Structure
• Resolved hyperfine structure observed in all upper states
• Two different patterns observed:
1) K=0 pattern with eQq shifted down
from ground state
US
GS
2) Pattern resembling nothing
in the ground state
3164 cm-1 band: Hyperfine Structure (J = 21)
Asterisks indicate a
pattern unlike the
ground state; all other
lines have K=0 pattern
Upper State Hyperfine
There are two clear limits:
Rigid Rotor
(no K mixing)
F'F''
Isotropic K distribution
21
32
?
11
10 22
12
Hyperfine maintains
ground state pattern
Experimental
Observations
Hyperfine collapses;
believed to be the
expected result for simple
coalescence
3132 cm-1 band: b-type
Laser pumps
R(1) of B band—
makes 212 in US
A
B
3132 cm-1 band: b-type
GS:
K=0
(largest US)
K=1
• Now the K = 1 pattern is observed; also, compression is observed as in 3164 cm-1 band
3114 cm-1 band
Most upper state intensity near trans GS; likely not isomerizing
Laser pumps
P(2) (and P(3))-prepares 202/101 in
US
3114 cm-1 band
GS:
K=0
(largest US)
K=1
GS K = 0 pattern without compression observed; regardless, some upper states show hyperfine patterns
unlike ground state (similar patterns to upper states in 3164 cm-1 band)
Conclusions
• A Balle-Flygare FTMW cavity was used to detect laser absorption from 30203180 cm-1
-Of the bands observed, most were pure a-type; a few (and one of the strongest)
were a-b hybrids.
-C-H stretching modes are predicted to be a-b hybrids, so some of the strongest
bands in the region are likely to be combination bands off the a-type isocyanate
stretch or C-C bend
• Hyperfine-resolved upper state spectra were observed on the chirped pulse-FTMW
instrument in the largest IR bands
-One band (3114 cm-1) does not appear to induce isomerization, but the frequency
spectra on other bands indicate that the upper states are delocalized between
trans and cis
-Quadrupole hyperfine structure is resolved in all upper states in all bands; most
states maintain the qualitative splitting patterns of K=0 or K=1 ground state
transitions, but with eQq smaller than for the ground state (or, according to
G03W predictions, at any static geometry around the torsional angle)
Acknowledgements
Pate Lab
Funding:
-NSF Chemistry and MRI program
-Jefferson Scholars Foundation (Justin)
Double Pulse Ground State Depletion
Bloch Vector Model
Initial
“/2”
“-/2”
Double Pulse Ground State Depletion
MW pulse sequence
FID signal
Fourier transform
Double Pulse Ground State Depletion
Effect of the Laser
Laser
“/2”
“-/2”
We can then detect the vector component in the
x-y plane as coherent emission against zero background.
Room Temperature FTIR
C-H stretches;
comb. bands
C-C stretch;
C-H bends
N=C=O stretch
GSD Band Summary
Band Origin (cm-1)
A Inten (mV)
B Inten (mV)
3164.42
41
0
3153.25
10
0
3132.10
14
26
3114.29
38
0
3100.52
9
0
3099.25
6
0
3092.88
10
0
3088-3091
20-25
0
3056.95
3
6
3047.10
1
1
3132 cm-1 band: a-type
Laser pumps
R(1) of A band—
SHOULD make 202
in US
A
B
3132 cm-1 band: a-type
GS:
K=0
(largest US)
K=1
• Confident only a-type transitions are being pumped, and J = 1 population is mostly in 101,
so seeing a K = 1 hyperfine pattern is a puzzling result; also, this spectrum is not compressed at all
• No upper states in this spectrum show the K = 0 hyperfine pattern