1270_Charles_Goodhart_Fri

Download Report

Transcript 1270_Charles_Goodhart_Fri

Liquidity
By Charles Goodhart
Financial Markets Group
London School of Economics
Some history:
Sharp decline in liquidity ratios since 1960s.
Why?
1. Failure of BCBS to agree a Liquidity Accord in 1980s.
2. Replacement of asset liquidity by funding liquidity:(a) efficient market hypothesis
(b) Basel II provides solvency assurance
(c) in a crisis CB will always provide
1
2
When crisis hits, (August 2007), CB unprepared for
scale, extent and stigma problems.
Moral hazard, vs. crisis resolution, (except ECB).
Extension of liquidity assistance by maturity, collateral
and financial counterparty.
No possibility of enforcing ‘good behaviour’ by threat of
failure. CBs provide liquidity insurance, so need to price
insurance. CARs or specific premia?
3
How does one define liquidity risk against which CB
provides insurance?
General answer: maturity mismatch, but this does not
depend on final maturity date of either assets (e.g.
government debt) or liabilities (e.g. demand deposits).
N.B. Asset liquidity depends, in part, on which assets CB
will accept as collateral. Role of CGFS.
Nevertheless assess maturity mismatch and impose a
scale of sanctions on those with insufficient liquidity.
4
Mark-to-Funding
The particular contribution of Geneva Report (A. Persaud).
At the moment, accounting arrangements for banks
depend on allocation to:• Hold to maturity
• Available for sale
• Trading book
With complex, and now shifting, rules for migration
between them.
But if funding short-dated, any asset must be available for
sale. If funding long-dated any asset can be held to
maturity.
5
Rather than relate asset-accounting structure to initial
purpose, which may be subject to change, relate it to
funding structure, which at any time is known.
But just how do you do this, since all liabilities fund all
assets, indistinguishably.
Allow banks to work out cost minimisation for themselves,
so that long-dated liabilities applied to riskiest assets,
short dated funding to less risky assets.
6
Varying views on ‘Mark to funding’.
General principle of assessing liquidity risk, and applying
sanctions for the riskier is, I believe, accepted.
Problem of BCBS with sanctions, ultra vires.
7