NWCC Midwest Transmission Workshop Presentation 6/22/2005 - Buffalo Ridge Incremental Generation Outlet Study
Download ReportTranscript NWCC Midwest Transmission Workshop Presentation 6/22/2005 - Buffalo Ridge Incremental Generation Outlet Study
Buffalo Ridge Incremental Generation Outlet (BRIGO) Transmission Study Presentation to National Wind Coordinating Committee June 22, 2005 W Grivna, PE of Xcel Energy R Gonzalez, PE of Excel Engineering, Inc. Outline • • • • • • • Study Purpose/Goals Background Participants Analysis Results Conclusions/Recommendations Next Steps Study Purpose/Goals • Determine feasibility of increasing Buffalo Ridge area generation outlet… • by several hundred MW… • through “modest” (presumably 115 kV-class) improvements… • that could be relatively quickly implemented… • while plans for future long-range regional transmission projects continue their evolution. Background • Buffalo Ridge is the premier wind resource in MN/SD • Transmission improvements under way to increase outlet capacity to 825 MW • Further interest confirmed by MISO & WAPA interconn queues • Xcel Energy has had specific MW & Energy % mandates • All other Minnesota power suppliers now also have renewable energy obligations • Result: Intense interest in wind development on the Ridge Transmission map of Buffalo Ridge Area Study Participants • Sponsor: Xcel Energy • Technical & Economic Analyses performed by Xcel Energy Reviewers/technical support: (MAPP MB SPG) • • • • • • • • • • • Western Area Power Administration Otter Tail Power Missouri River Energy Services MISO Marshall Municipal Utilities Great River Energy East River Electric Power Cooperative Alliant Energy State regulators (MN/ND/SD) Energy Policy Groups (Wind on the Wires) IPPs Analysis • Powerflow: Concentrate on 2007, summer offpeak condition – System intact – First contingency (“n-1”) • Requirement: satisfy applicable voltage and loading criteria • Identify “existing system” (post-825 MW additions) outlet limits for Buffalo Ridge Mpls/St Paul deliveries • Formulate transmission options • Test Options’ performance – Electrical – Financial Cost versus Outlet for Options Complications • • • • • • • Reactive power requirements/Voltage Stability Power and Energy losses Load-serving considerations Constructability MISO-WAPA interface North Dakota Export (NDEX) interface Geographic extent of Ridge Results • All Options can achieve 300-500 MW of incremental outlet • Some Options require extensive additional improvements – Line reconductors & rebuilds – Transformer replacements – Shunt capacitor additions • Incremental energy losses are high (25 – 30%) • The “best” Options all include a second (independent) Fenton-Nobles Co 115 kV outlet path to the new 345 kV Conclusions/Recommendations • Implement “Option 31A” – – – – – 2nd Nobles Co 345/115 kV transformer 2nd Nobles Co-Fenton 115 kV line Lake Yankton-Marshall 115 kV line Several shunt capacitor banks Misc reconductors, equipment upgrades • Capable of providing 300 - 500 MW of incremental outlet (beyond 825 MW level) at reasonable cost • Provides some incidental load-serving benefits Map of Option 31A Next Steps • Coordinate & confirm compatibility with likely long-range plans & identified projects – CapX – Big Stone 2 – MISO NW Exploratory • Address adaptation to specific proposed wind gen projects • (Need “Yankee fix” if MWs on north Ridge exceed critical level) • Coordinate with MISO stability study results • Initiate permitting process