Faculty Senate II

Download Report

Transcript Faculty Senate II

HLC- Regional Reaccreditation
Dec. 4, 2012
Dr. Joseph Frizado
Vice Provost for Academic Operations &
Assessment
Current Situation
Final Website
HLC Timeline- Progress Report
• Aug. 31
Quality Initiative - Learning Commons
• Sept. 14 HLC acceptance/reviewer comments
• Oct. 17-18 Peer Reviewer training
Frizado, Houston, Colom, Folkins
• Feb. 18
First site visit in new program (Frizado)
• Mar. 4
Site visit (Colom)
• Mar. 18
Site visit (Folkins) – Site visit (Houston)
Timeline- BGSU
• Today- First draft in progress
• 34,587 Words
• 625 Documents
• 800 MB Space
•
•
•
•
•
Complete first draft/Begin editing process
Insure links/documents are in place
Complete second draft/ Circulate documents
Complete third draft/ Open website
Campus Visit by HLC Peer Reviewers
Campus Visit
•
•
•
•
Website is closed on March 15th
BGSU Documents available via web
Campus Visit April 15th – 16th
Specific meetings
•
•
•
•
President
Board of Trustees
Faculty Senate leadership
Requested clarifications
• Public meetings (faculty, staff, students and
all other interested parties)
Public Meetings
• Criterion 1 - Mission
The institution’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it
guides the institution’s operations.
• Criterion 2 – Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct
The institution acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical and
responsible.
Public Meetings
• Criterion 3 – Teaching & Learning: Quality, Resources, and
Support
The institution provides high quality education, wherever and
however its offerings are delivered.
• Criterion 4 - Teaching & Learning: Evaluation and Improvement
The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its
educational programs, learning environments, and support
services, and it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning
through processes designed to promote continuous improvement.
Public Meetings
• Criterion 5 – Resources, Planning, and Institutional
Effectiveness
The institution’s resources, structures, and processes are
sufficient to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its
educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and
opportunities. The institution plans for the future.
Summary
• Draft is in progress
• Documents will be made available publically
at least one month before visit
• Campus Visit April 15-16, 2013
– Specific meetings
– Public Forums