Transcript 11-14/1192
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
MAC calibration results comparison
Date: 2014-09-10
Authors:
Name
Affiliations Address
Phone
email
Yanchun Li
Huawei
Technology
+8615337257958
+8618575596011
+8618565826350
[email protected]
Xueli Kong
Bantian Longgang Shenzhen
518129 P.R. China
Zhou Lan
Gwen Barriac
[email protected]
[email protected]
Qualcomm
Qingjiang Tian
Suhwook Kim
LGE
Wookbong Lee
HanGyu Cho
Peng Meng
Intel Corp
Rongzhen Yang
Robert Stacey
Po-Kai Huang
Chinghwa Yu
MediaTek Inc.
ChaoChun Wang
Submission
Slide 1
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Name
Affiliations Address
Filip Mestanov
Ericsson AB
Esa Tuomaala
Nokia
Olli Alanen
Phone email
Färögatan 6, Stockholm +46 725
Sweden 168 40
298 161
2075 Allston Way #200
Berkeley, CA, USA
[email protected]
[email protected]
Sayantan Choudhury
Jarkko Kneckt
Shoko Shinohara
NTT
[email protected]
Akira Kishida
[email protected]
Yasuhiko Inoue
[email protected]
Akira Yamada
Ke Yao
NTT
DOCOMO
ZTE
[email protected]
[email protected]
Bo Sun
Submission
[email protected]
Slide 2
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Summary
• This contribution provides result comparison of MAC calibration
of test 1-3 from variety of companies [1][2]
• This contribution also proposes a criteria for result alignment
• There are some parameter setting in the simulation scenario
document that may generate different interpretation, this
contribution clarifies these parameter settings
Submission
Slide 3
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Status Overview
•
Status √: aligned, −: No need to provide
Box 3 – MAC Calibration
Calibration
Simulation
Scenarios
Test 1a
Test 1b
Test 2a
Scenario Names
MAC overhead w/out RTS/CTS
MAC overhead w RTS/CTS
Deferral Test 1
Test 2b
Test 3
Deferral Test
NAV deferral
2
Configurations
MCS = [0]
MCS = [0]
MCS = [8]
MCS = [8]
MCS = [0]
MCS = [0]
MCS = [8]
MCS = [8]
RTS/CTS
[OFF]
RTS/CTS
[ON]
RTS/CTS
[OFF]
RTS/CTS
[ON]
Metrics
MAC Tput
Check
Points
MAC Tput
Check
Points
MAC Tput
Check
Points
MAC Tput
Check
Points
MAC Tput
MAC Tput
MAC Tput
MAC Tput
LG
√
√
√
−
√
√
√
−
√
√
√
√
√
−
√
√
√
−
√
√
√
√
−
√
√
−
√
√
√
√
Huawei
√
√
Qualcomm
√
√
MediaTek
√
√
√
−
√
√
√
−
√
√
√
√
√
Intel
√
√
−
√
√
−
√
√
Ericsson
√
√
−
√
√
−
√
√
Nokia
√
√
−
√
√
−
√
√
NTT
√
√
−
√
√
−
√
√
√
Test 4
Deferral Test for
20 and 40MHz
BSSs
√
…
•
Criteria:
•
Make average over most close three companies as the baseline to compare
•
If the performance value intended for calibration is within 5% deviation, it is marked as aligned
Submission
Slide 4
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
AP1
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Configurations
Test 1a
500
4.79
4.81
4.76
4.76
4.76
4.75
4.76
4.79
Huawei
LGE
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Ericsson
Nokia
NTT
MCS0 (6.5Mbps)
1000
1500
5.55
5.84
5.55
5.84
5.53
5.82
5.53
5.82
5.53
5.82
5.52
5.82
5.52
5.83
5.54
5.84
test1a (MCS0)
2000
6.00
5.99
5.98
5.98
5.98
5.97
5.97
6.00
500
21.98
22.4
23.92
21.71
21.53
21.53
21.19
22.00
MCS8 (78Mbps)
1000
1500
34.91
43.24
35.2
43.25
37.25
45.55
34.65
42.71
34.46
42.58
34.47
42.57
34.22
41.93
35.00
43.20
2000
48.67
48.9
50.81
48.15
48.14
48.09
47.74
48.40
test1a (MCS8)
55
5.9
50
5.7
5.3
L4 Tput (Mbps)
L4 Tput (Mbps)
45
5.5
LGE
Huawei
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Ericsson
Nokia
NTT
5.1
4.9
4.7
4.5
500
Submission
1000
1500
MSDU size (bytes)
40
LGE
Huawei
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Ericsson
Nokia
NTT
35
30
25
2000
Slide 5
20
500
1000
1500
MSDU size (bytes)
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
2000
AP1
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Configurations
Test 1b
500
4.42
4.45
4.4
4.40
4.4
4.40
4.42
Huawei
LGE
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Nokia
NTT
MCS0 (6.5Mbps)
1000
1500
5.31
5.66
5.31
5.66
5.29
5.64
5.29
5.64
5.29
5.64
5.28
5.64
5.30
5.67
test1b (MCS0)
2000
5.85
5.86
5.84
5.84
5.84
5.83
5.85
500
15.94
16.2
18.64
15.79
15.7
15.52
16.00
MCS8 (78Mbps)
1000
1500
27.07
34.97
27.3
35
30.75
38.94
26.90
34.62
26.8
34.55
26.66
34.12
27.10
34.97
2000
40.61
40.8
44.51
40.24
40.26
39.96
40.40
test1b (MCS8)
6
45
5.8
40
5.4
L4 Tput (Mbps)
L4 Tput (Mbps)
5.6
5.2
5
LGE
Huawei
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Nokia
NTT
4.8
4.6
4.4
4.2
500
Submission
1000
1500
MSDU size (bytes)
35
30
LGE
Huawei
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Nokia
NTT
25
20
2000
Slide 6
15
500
1000
1500
MSDU size (bytes)
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
2000
AP1
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Configurations
Test 2a
500
4.56
4.62
4.57
4.71
4.52
4.53
4.58
4.58
Huawei
LGE
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Ericsson
Nokia
NTT
Without RTS/CTS
1000
1500
5.25
5.51
5.28
5.54
5.26
5.53
5.48
5.78
5.22
5.48
5.21
5.48
5.29
5.56
5.25
5.45
2000
5.66
5.66
5.67
5.94
5.62
5.63
5.71
5.66
500
4.46
4.5
With RTS/CTS
1000
1500
5.33
5.68
5.34
5.68
2000
5.87
5.88
4.45
5.32
5.67
5.86
4.35
4.44
5.24
5.31
5.62
5.67
5.81
5.86
4.48
4.49
5.32
5.35
5.67
5.70
5.85
5.88
test2a (RTS/CTS)
test2a (no RTS/CTS)
6
5.8
5.7
5.6
5.5
5.4
5.3
LGE
Huawei
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Ericsson
Nokia
NTT
5.1
4.9
4.7
4.5
500
Submission
1000
1500
MSDU size (bytes)
L4 Tput (Mbps)
L4 Tput (Mbps)
5.9
5.2
5
LGE
Huawei
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Nokia
NTT
4.8
4.6
4.4
2000
4.2
500
Slide 7
1000
1500
MSDU size (bytes)
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
2000
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Test 2b results
• L4 Tputs with MPDU Frame Aggregation (FA)
test 2b (no RTS/CTS)
40
35
L4 Tput (Mbps)
30
25
LGE
Huawei
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Nokia
NTT
Scenarios
Huawei LGE Qualcomm MediaTek Intel Nokia NTT
test2b-noRTS1.62
1.7
noFA-MCS0
test2b-noRTS1.01
1.02
0.98 0.03631 1.008
1.06
1.20
FA-MCS0
test2b-noRTS26.54
26.8
noFA-MCS8
test2b-noRTS34.75
35.0
35.66
FA-MCS8
20
15
10
5
0
MCS0
Submission
MCS8
Slide 8
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Test 3 results
• L4 Tputs with MPDU Frame Aggregation (FA)
test 3 (RTS/CTS)
35
30
L4 Tput (Mbps)
25
20
LGE
Huawei
Qualcomm
MediaTek
Intel
Nokia
NTT
Scenarios
Huawei LGE Qualcomm MediaTek Intel Nokia NTT
test3-RTS5.15 5.14
noFA-MCS0
test3-RTS-FA5.58 5.58
5.55
5.63933
5.66
5.59 5.40
MCS0
test3-RTS22.04 22.4
noFA-MCS8
test3-RTS-FA34.05 34.2
31.35
MCS8
15
10
5
0
MCS0
Submission
MCS8
Slide 9
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Proposed parameter setting modification
•
Test 1a
–
–
–
•
Test 1b
–
–
–
•
Data MCS = [0]
ACK MCS = 0
AIFS=DIFS = 34us
CWmax=1023
Test 2b
–
–
–
–
–
•
Data MCS = [0,8] ( to clarify, run a sweep over MSDU length once for MCS 0, and once for MCS 8.
ACK MCS = 0
AIFS=DIFS = 34us
Test 2a
–
–
–
–
•
Data MCS = [0,8] ( to clarify, run a sweep over MSDU length once for MCS 0, and once for MCS 8.
ACK MCS = 0
AIFS=DIFS = 34us
2 MPDU limit
Data MCS = [0]
ACK MCS = 0
AIFS=DIFS = 34us
CWmax=1023
Test 3
–
–
–
–
–
Submission
2 MPDU limit
Data MCS = [0]
ACK MCS = 0
AIFS=DIFS = 34us
CWmax=1023
Slide 10
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Straw poll
• Do you support adopting the parameter settings listed in slide 9
into the simulation scenario document
– YES
– NO
– ABS
Submission
Slide 11
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Straw poll
• Do you support adopting a link of this contribution into the
simulation scenario document as an initial report of box 3 MAC
calibration
– Instruct the editor to add the following paragraph before Annex 1
Calibration results
The initial calibration report is provided in contribution [].
– Instruct the editor to add reference of this contribution
[]11-14-1192-03-00ax-comparing-mac-calibration-results.pptx
• YES
• NO
• ABS
Submission
Slide 12
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)
September 2014
doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1192r3
Reference
• [1]11-14-1230-00-00ax-mac-calibration-result.pptx
• [2]11-14-1192-00-00ax-comparing-mac-calibration-results.pptx
Submission
Slide 13
Zhou Lan (Huawei Technology)