Transcript BA 469 Chap006.ppt
6 15/e PPT
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Supplementing the Chosen Competitive Strategy
Screen graphics created by: Jana F. Kuzmicki, Ph.D.
Troy University-Florida Region
© 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
“Successful business strategy is about actively shaping the game you play, not just playing the game you find.”
Adam M. Brandenburger and Barry J. Nalebuff
6-2
“The sure path to oblivion is to stay where you are.”
Bernard Fauber
6-3
Chapter Roadmap
Collaborative Strategies: Alliances and Partnerships Merger and Acquisition Strategies Vertical Integration Strategies: Operating Across More Stages of the Industry Value Chain Outsourcing Strategies: Narrowing the Boundaries of the Business Offensive Strategies: Improving Market Position and Building Competitive Advantage Defensive Strategies: Protecting Market Position and Competitive Advantage Web Site Strategies Choosing Appropriate Functional-Area Strategies First-Mover Advantages and Disadvantages 6-4
Fig. 6.1: A Company’s Menu of Strategy Options
6-5
Collaborative Strategies: Alliances and Partnerships
Companies sometimes use
strategic alliances
or
collaborative partnerships
to complement their own strategic initiatives and strengthen their competitiveness. Such cooperative strategies go beyond normal company-to-company dealings but fall short of merger or full joint venture partnership.
6-6
Alliances Can Enhance a Firm’s Competitiveness
Alliances and partnerships can help companies cope with two demanding
competitive challenges
Racing against rivals to build a market presence in many different national markets Racing against rivals to seize opportunities on the frontiers of advancing technology
Collaborative arrangements lower
its
costs
can help a company and/or
gain access
to needed
expertise
and
capabilities
6-7
Characteristics of a Strategic Alliance
Strategic alliance
– A
formal agreement
more separate companies where there is between two or Strategically relevant collaboration of some sort Joint contribution of resources Shared risk Shared control Mutual dependence
Alliances
often
involve
Joint marketing Joint sales or distribution Joint production Design collaboration Joint research Projects to jointly develop new technologies or products 6-8
What Factors Make an Alliance Strategic?
It is critical to a company’s achievement of an important objective It helps build, sustain, or enhance a core competence or competitive advantage It helps block a competitive threat It helps open up important market opportunities It mitigates a significant risk to a company’s business 6-9
Why Are Strategic Alliances Formed?
To collaborate on technology development or new product development To fill gaps in technical or manufacturing expertise To create new skill sets and capabilities To improve supply chain efficiency To gain economies of scale in production and/or marketing To acquire or improve market access via joint marketing agreements 6-10
Examples of Strategic Alliances
General Electric – Snecma of France
Low-thrust commercial aircraft engines
Toshiba – IBM
64-megabyte and 25-megabyte memory chip facility
Mitsui – General Electric
Power systems
GM – Daewoo
Build Buick Excells in Shanghai
Texas Instrument – Compel Communications
Build ultra cheap cell phones
Mitsubishi – Caterpillar
Joint venture to manufacture excavator line
6-11
Potential Benefits of Alliances to Achieve Global and Industry Leadership
Get into critical country markets quickly to accelerate process of building a global presence Gain inside knowledge about unfamiliar markets and cultures Access valuable skills and competencies concentrated in particular geographic locations Establish a beachhead to participate in target industry Master new technologies and build new expertise faster than would be possible internally Open up expanded opportunities in target industry by combining firm’s capabilities with resources of partners 6-12
Capturing the Benefits of Strategic Alliances
Benefits from forming partnerships are a function of Picking a good partner Being sensitive to cultural differences Recognizing an alliance must benefit both parties Ensuring both parties live up to their commitments Structuring the decision-making process so actions can be taken swiftly when needed Managing the learning process and then adjusting the alliance agreement over time to fit new circumstances 6-13
Why Alliances Fail
Ability
of an
alliance
to
endure
depends on How well partners work together Success of partners in responding and adapting to changing conditions Willingness of partners to renegotiate the bargain
Reasons
for
alliance failure
Diverging objectives and priorities of partners Inability of partners to work well together Changing conditions rendering purpose of alliance obsolete Emergence of more attractive technological paths Marketplace rivalry between one or more allies 6-14
Merger and Acquisition Strategies
Merger
– Combination and pooling of equals, with newly created firm often taking on a new name
Acquisition
– One firm, the acquirer, purchases and absorbs operations of another, the acquired
Merger-acquisition strategy
Much-used strategic option Especially suited for situations where alliances do not provide a firm with needed capabilities or cost-reducing opportunities Ownership allows for tightly integrated operations, creating more control and autonomy than alliances 6-15
Objectives of Mergers and Acquisitions
To create a more cost-efficient operation To expand a firm’s geographic coverage To extend a firm’s business into new product categories or international markets To gain quick access to new technologies or competitive capabilities To invent a new industry and lead the convergence of industries whose boundaries are blurred by changing technologies and new market opportunities 6-16
Pitfalls of Mergers and Acquisitions
Combining operations may result in Resistance from rank-and-file employees Hard-to-resolve conflicts in management styles and corporate cultures Tough problems of integration Greater-than-anticipated difficulties in Achieving expected cost-savings Sharing of expertise Achieving enhanced competitive capabilities 6-17
Vertical Integration Strategies
Extend
a firm’s
same industry competitive scope
within
Backward
into sources of supply
Forward
toward end-users of final product Can aim at either
full
or
partial integration
Activities, Costs, & Margins of Suppliers Internally Performed Activities, Costs, & Margins
6-18
Activities, Costs, & Margins of Forward Channel Allies & Strategic Partners Buyer/User Value Chains
Strategic Advantages of Backward Integration
Generates cost savings only if volume needed is big enough to capture efficiencies of suppliers Potential to reduce costs exists when Suppliers have sizable profit margins Item supplied is a major cost component Resource requirements are easily met Can produce a differentiation-based competitive advantage when it results in a better quality part Reduces risk of depending on suppliers of crucial raw materials / parts / components 6-19
Strategic Advantages of Forward Integration
To gain better access to end users and better market visibility To compensate for undependable distribution channels which undermine steady operations To offset the lack of a broad product line, a firm may sell directly to end users To bypass regular distribution channels in favor of direct sales and Internet retailing which may Lower distribution costs Produce a relative cost advantage over rivals Enable lower selling prices to end users 6-20
Strategic Disadvantages of Vertical Integration
Boosts resource requirements Locks firm deeper into same industry Results in fixed sources of supply and less flexibility in accommodating buyer demands for product variety Poses all types of capacity-matching problems May require radically different skills / capabilities Reduces flexibility to make changes in component parts which may lengthen design time and ability to introduce new products 6-21
Pros and Cons of Integration vs. De-Integration
Whether
vertical integration is a
viable strategic option
depends on its Ability to lower cost, build expertise, increase differentiation, or enhance performance of strategy-critical activities Impact on investment cost, flexibility, and administrative overhead Contribution to enhancing a firm’s competitiveness
Many companies are finding that
de-integrating
value chain activities is a
more flexible, economic strategic option!
6-22
Outsourcing Strategies
Concept
Outsourcing involves
withdrawing
certain
value chain activities
and from
relying on outsiders
to supply needed products, support services, or functional activities
Suppliers Internally Performed Activities Functional Activities Support Services Distributors or Retailers
6-23
When Does Outsourcing Make Strategic Sense?
Activity can be performed better or more cheaply by outside specialists Activity is not crucial to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage Risk exposure to changing technology and/or changing buyer preferences is reduced It improves firm’s ability to innovate Operations are streamlined to Improve flexibility Cut time to get new products into the market It increases firm’s ability to assemble diverse kinds of expertise speedily and efficiently Firm can concentrate on “core” value chain activities that best suit its resource strengths 6-24
Risk of an Outsourcing Strategy
Farming
thus out
too many
or the
wrong activities,
Hollowing out
capabilities
Losing touch
with activities and expertise that determine overall long-term success 6-25
For Discussion: Write your opinion and discuss
Refer to Illustration Capsule 6.3 (p. 190): Explain why the telephone companies were overtaken by cable companies in providing internet access using DSL. Were they really that slow?? 6-26
Offensive and Defensive Strategies
Offensive Strategies
Used to
build new
or
stronger market position
and/or
create competitive advantage
Defensive Strategies
Used to
protect competitive advantage
(rarely lead to creating advantage) 6-27
Principles of Offensive Strategies
Focus relentlessly on Building competitive advantage
and
Striving to convert it into decisive advantage Employ the element of surprise as opposed to doing what rivals expect Apply resources where rivals are least able to defend themselves Be impatient with the status quo and display a strong bias for swift, decisive actions to boost a firm’s competitive position vis-à-vis rivals 6-28
Types of Offensive Strategy Options
1.
Offer an equally good or better product at a lower price
2.
Leapfrog competitors by being First adopter of next-generation technologies
or
First to market with next-generation products
3.
Pursue continuous product innovation to draw sales and market share away from less innovative rivals
4.
Adopt and improve on the good ideas of other companies 6-29
Types of Offensive Strategy Options
(con’t) 5.
Deliberately attack market segments where a key rival makes big profits
6.
Attack competitive weaknesses of rivals
7.
Maneuver around competitors and concentrate on capturing unoccupied or less contested market territory
8.
Use hit-and-run or guerrilla warfare tactics to grab sales and market share from complacent rivals
9.
Launch a preemptive strike to secure an advantageous position that rivals are prevented from duplicating 6-30
What Is a Blue Ocean Strategy?
Seeks to gain a dramatic, durable
competitive advantage
by
Abandoning efforts competitors
to
beat out
in existing markets
and
Inventing a new industry market segment
or
distinctive
to render existing competitors largely irrelevant
and
Allowing a company to
capture create
and altogether
new demand
6-31
Type of Markets: Blue Ocean Strategy
Typical Market Space
Industry boundaries are defined and accepted Competitive rules are well understood by all rivals Companies try to outperform rivals by capturing a bigger share of existing demand
Blue Ocean Market Space
Industry does not exist yet Industry is untainted by competition Industry offers wide-open opportunities if a firm has a product and strategy allowing it to Create new demand
and
Avoid fighting over existing demand 6-32
Choosing Rivals to Attack
Four types of firms can be the target of a fresh offensive Vulnerable market leaders Runner-up firms with weaknesses where challenger is strong Struggling rivals on verge of going under Small local or regional firms with limited capabilities 6-33
Using Offensive Strategy to Achieve Competitive Advantage
Strategic offensives offering competitive advantage
entail strongest basis for An important core competence A unique competitive capability A better-known brand name A cost advantage in manufacturing or distribution Technological superiority A superior product 6-34
Defensive Strategy
Objectives
Lessen risk of being attacked Blunt impact of any attack that occurs Influence challengers to aim attacks at other rivals
Approaches
Block avenues open to challengers Signal challengers vigorous retaliation is likely 6-35
Block Avenues Open to Challengers
Participate in alternative technologies Introduce new features, add new models, or broaden product line to close gaps rivals may pursue Maintain economy-priced models Increase warranty coverage Offer free training and support services Reduce delivery times for spare parts Make early announcements about new products or price changes Challenge quality or safety of rivals’ products using legal tactics Sign exclusive agreements with distributors 6-36
Signal Challengers Retaliation Is Likely
Publicly announce management’s strong commitment to maintain present market share Publicly commit firm to policy of matching rivals’ terms or prices Maintain war chest of cash reserves Make occasional counter-response to moves of weaker rivals 6-37
Web Site Strategies
Strategic Challenge
– What use of the Internet should a company make in staking out its position in the marketplace?
Five Web site approaches
Use to disseminate only product information Use as minor distribution channel to sell direct to customers Use as one of several important distribution channels to access customers Use as primary distribution channel to access buyers Use as exclusive channel to transact sales with customers 6-38
Using the Internet to Disseminate Product Information
Approach
– Website used to provide product information of manufacturers or wholesalers Relies on click-throughs to websites of dealers for sales transactions Informs end-users of location of retail stores
Issues
– Pursuing online sales may Signal weak strategic commitment to dealers Signal willingness to cannibalize dealers’ sales Prompt dealers to aggressively market rivals’ brands
Avoids channel conflict
with dealers – Important where strong support of dealer networks is essential 6-39
Using the Internet as a Minor Distribution Channel
Approach
– Use online sales to Achieve incremental sales Gain online sales experience Conduct marketing research Learn more about buyer tastes and preferences Test reactions to new products Create added market buzz about products Unlikely to provoke much outcry from dealers 6-40
Reasons to Use the Internet as a Minor Distribution Channel
Manufacturer’s profit margin from online sales is bigger than that from sales through traditional channels Encouraging buyers to visit a firm’s website educates them to the ease and convenience of purchasing online Selling directly to end users allows a manufacturer to make greater use of build-to-order manufacturing and assembly 6-41
Brick-and-Click Strategies: An Appealing Middle Ground Approach
Approach
Sell directly to consumers
and
Use traditional wholesale/retail channels
Strategic appeal
for wholesalers and retailers Economic means of expanding a company’s economic reach Provide both existing and potential customers another choice of how to Communicate with a company Shop for product information Make purchases Resolve customer service problems 6-42
Strategies for Online Enterprises
Approach
– Use Internet as the exclusive channel for all buyer-seller contact and transactions
Strategic issues
for an online company How to deliver unique value to buyers Whether it will pursue competitive advantage based on lower costs, differentiation, or better value for the money Whether it will have a broad or narrow product offering Whether to perform order fulfillment activities internally or to outsource them How it will draw traffic to its Web site and then convert page views into revenues 6-43
Choosing Appropriate Functional-Area Strategies
Involves
strategic choices
about
how functional areas
are
managed strategy
to
support competitive
and other strategic moves
Functional strategies
include Research and development Production Human resources Sales and marketing Finance
Tailoring
functional-area strategies
to
support key business-level strategies
is critical!
6-44
First-Mover Advantages
When
to make a
strategic move
is often as crucial as
what
move to make
First-mover advantages
arise when Pioneering helps build firm’s image and reputation Early commitments to new technologies, new-style components, and distribution channels can produce cost advantage Loyalty of first time buyers is high Moving first can be a preemptive strike 6-45
First-Mover Disadvantages
Moving early
can be a
disadvantage
produce an advantage)
when
(or fail to When costs of pioneering are more than being an imitative follower and only negligible learning/experience curve benefits accrue to the leader Innovator’s products are primitive, not living up to buyer expectations Demand side of the market is skeptical about the benefits of new technology/product of a first-mover Rapid technological change allows followers to leapfrog pioneers 6-46
Strategic Issues: To Be a First-Mover or Not
Key issue
– Is the race to market leadership in an industry a marathon or a sprint?
Seeking a
competitive advantage
by being a first mover involves addressing several questions Does market takeoff depend on development of complementary products or services not currently available?
Is new infrastructure required before buyer demand can surge?
Will buyers need to learn new skills or adopt new behaviors?
Will buyers encounter high switching costs?
Are there influential competitors in a position to delay or derail the efforts of a first-mover?
6-47