OWL Purdue "Argument"
Download
Report
Transcript OWL Purdue "Argument"
Organizing Your
Argument
A presentation brought to you by
the Purdue University
Writing Lab, adapted by Steven
Federle, Solano College
What is an argument?
An argument involves
the process of
establishing a claim
and then proving it
with the use of logical
reasoning, examples,
and research.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Why is organization important
in building an argument?
Guides an audience
through your
reasoning process
Offers a clear
explanation of each
argued point
Demonstrates the
credibility of the
writer
Purdue University Writing Lab
Organizing your argument
Title
Introduction
Thesis statement
Body Paragraphs
Constructing Topic
Sentences
Building Main Points
Countering the
Opposition
Conclusion
Purdue University Writing Lab
Title--why do you need
one?
Introduces the topic of
discussion to the
audience
Generates reader
interest in the argument
Purdue University Writing Lab
Creating a Title
Try to grab attention by
offering a provocative
image
picking up on words or
examples offered in the
body or conclusion of the
paper
asking a question
Avoid titles that are too
general or lack character
Purdue University Writing Lab
Considering Titles
Imagine you just wrote a paper offering
solutions to the problem of road rage.
Which do you consider to be the best
title?
Road Rage
Can’t Drive 55
Road Rage: Curing Our Highway Epidemic
Purdue University Writing Lab
What is an introduction?
Acquaints the reader
with the topic and
purpose of the paper
Generates the
audience’s interest in
the topic
Offers a plan for the
ensuing argument
Purdue University Writing Lab
Methods for Constructing an
Introduction
personal anecdote
example-real or
hypothetical
question
quotation
shocking statistics
striking image
Purdue University Writing Lab
What is a thesis statement?
The MOST IMPORTANT
SENTENCE in your paper
Lets the reader know the main
idea of the paper
Answers the question: “What
am I trying to prove?”
Not a factual statement, but a
claim that has to be proven
throughout the paper
Purdue University Writing Lab
Role of the thesis statement
The thesis statement should
guide your reader through
your argument.
The thesis statement is
generally located in the
introduction of the paper.
A thesis statement may also
be located within the body of
the paper or in the
conclusion, depending upon
the purpose or argument of
the paper.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Which thesis statement is the most
effective for an argument about the
need for V-chips in television sets?
Parents, often too busy to watch television shows with
their families, can monitor their children’s viewing
habits with the aid of the V-chip.
To help parents monitor their children’s viewing habits,
the V-chip should be a required feature for television
sets sold in the U.S.
This paper will describe a V-chip and examine the
uses of the V-chip in American-made television sets.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Body Paragraphs and
Topic Sentences
Body paragraphs build upon the claims
made in the introductory paragraph(s)
Organize with the use of topic.
sentences that illustrate the main idea
of each paragraph.
Offering a brief explanation of the
history or recent developments in your
topic within the early body paragraphs
can help the audience to become
familiarized with your topic and the
complexity of the issue.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Body Paragraphs
Paragraphs may be
ordered in several ways,
depending upon the topic
and purpose of your
argument:
General to specific
information
Most important point to least
important point
Weakest claim to strongest
claim
Purdue University Writing Lab
Offering a Counterargument
Addressing the claims of the
opposition is an important
component in building a
convincing argument.
It demonstrates your
credibility as a writer--you
have researched multiple
sides of the argument and
have come to an informed
decision.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Offering a Counterargument
Counterarguments may be
located at various
locations within your body
paragraphs.
You may choose to
build each of your main
points as a contrast to
oppositional claims.
offer a counterargument
after you have articulated
your main claims.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Counterarguing effectively
Consider your audience when
you offer your counterargument.
Conceding to some of your
opposition’s concerns can
demonstrate respect for their
opinions.
Remain tactful yet firm.
Using rude or deprecating
language can cause your audience
to reject your position without
carefully considering your claims.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Incorporating research into the
body paragraphs
Researched material can aid
you in proving the claims of
your argument and disproving
oppositional claims.
Be sure to use your research
to support the claims made in
your topic sentences--make
your research work to prove
your argument!
Purdue University Writing Lab
Conclusion -- The Big Finale
Your conclusion should
reemphasize the main
points made in your paper.
You may choose to
reiterate a call to action or
speculate on the future of
your topic, when
appropriate.
Avoid raising new claims in
your conclusion.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Organizing your argument
Title
Introduction
Body Paragraphs
Constructing Topic
Sentences
Building Main Points
Countering the
Opposition
Conclusion
Purdue University Writing Lab
Rhetorical Forms for Argument
Rogerian Argument
Deductive Argument
Inductive Argument
Syllogism
Toulmin Argument
Purdue University Writing Lab
Rogerian Argument
Conciliatory style
Begin by summarizing opposing viewpoints
Carefully consider the position of those who disagree
with you. What are their legitimate concerns? If you
were in their place, how would you react?
Present opposing points of view accurately and fairly.
Demonstrate respect for the ideas of those who
disagree with you.
Acknowledge the concerns that you and your
opposition share.
Point out to readers how they will benefit from the
position you are defining.
Present the evidence that supports your point of view.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Using deductive and inductive
arguments
Deductive
reasoning proceeds from a
general premise or assumption to a
specific conclusion.
Inductive reasoning proceeds from
individual observations to a more
general conclusion.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Deductive Reasoning
Syllogism:
a syllogism consists of
a
major premise, which is a general
statement;
A minor premise which is a related but
more specific statement
And a conclusion, which has to be drawn
from those premises.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Syllogism
Major
premise: All Olympic runners are
fast
Minor premise: Jesse Owens was an
Olympic runner.
Conclusion: Therefore, Jesse Owens
was fast.
Purdue University Writing Lab
The Declaration of Independence
Major
premise: Tyrannical rulers
deserve no loyalty;
Minor premise: King George III is a
tyrannical ruler
Conclusion: Therefore, King George III
deserves no loyalty.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Syllogisms
When
the conclusion follows logically
from the major and minor premises,
then the argument is said to be valid.
Example of an invalid premise
Major
premise: All dogs are animals
Minor premise: All cats are animals
Conclusion: All dogs are cats
Purdue University Writing Lab
Using Inductive Arguments
Move
from specific examples or facts to
a general conclusion.
The process involves:
A question
to be answered
Evidence gathered
Conclusion (reached by inference (or
inductive leap) that answers the question
and takes the evidence into account).
Purdue University Writing Lab
Inductive Reasoning
Question: How did that living room window
get broken?
Evidence: baseball on floor; baseball not
there this morning; children were playing
baseball in the front yard earlier; they stopped
playing abruptly a little while ago; the children
have gone home.
Conclusion: one of the children hit or threw
the baseball through the window, and then
they all ran away.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Toulmin Logic
This is an effort to describe argument as it
actually occurs in everyday life.
The CLAIM is the main point of the essay; it is
usually stated as the thesis.
The GROUNDS is the material a writer uses
to support the claim (evidence)
The WARRANT is the inference that connects
the grounds to the claim; it can be a belief
that is taken for granted, or an assumptions
that underlies the argument.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Toulmin Logic
Claim:
King George III deserves no
loyalty.
Grounds: King George III is a tyrannical
ruler (supported by facts and examples)
Warrant: Tyrannical rulers deserve no
loyalty.
The clearer your warrant, the more
likely readers will be to agree with it.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Logical Fallacies: Begging the
Question
Assumes in the premise what the arguer
should be trying to prove in the conclusion.
“The unfair and shortsighted legislation that limits
free trade is clearly a threat to the American
economy.”
Restrictions may or may not be unfair and shortsighted,
but emotionally loaded language does not constitute
proof. The statement begs the question because it
assumes what it should be proving – that restrictive
legislation is dangerous.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Argument from Analogy
An
analogy explains something
unfamiliar by comparing it to something
more familiar.
An argument based on an analogy
frequently ignores important
dissimilarities between the two things;
when this happens, the argument is
fallacious.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Personal Attack (Ad Hominem)
This
fallacy tries to divert attention from
the facts by attacking the motives or
character of the person making the
argument.
The
public should not take seriously Dr.
Mason’s plan for upgrading county health
services. He is a recovering alcoholic
whose second wife recently divorced him.
Purdue University Writing Lab
Other fallacies
See list and descriptions on pages 542-43
False Dilemma,
Equivocation,
Red Herring,
You also (Tu Quoque)
Appeal to Doubtful Authority,
Misleading Statistics,
Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc (After This,
Therefore Because of That)
Non Sequitur (It Does Not Follow)
Purdue University Writing Lab
Transitions and Checklist
See
transitions checklist on page 544
See revisions checklist on page 546
Purdue University Writing Lab
IN-CLASS
WRITING
ASSIGNMENT
• Look at the
newspaper ad
from the ACLU
on page 555,
arguing against
the death
penalty.
• What points does
the ad’s headline
make? Does the
rest of the ad
support the
headline?
• How would you
describe the
picture that
accompanies the
ad? In what way
does the picture
reinforce the
message of the
text?
• Does this ad
appeal primarily
to logic, to
emotions, or to
both? Explain.
• List the specific
points the ad
makes. Which
points are
supported by
evidence? Which
points should be
supported by
evidence but are
not? In what way
does this lack of
support affect
your response to
the ad?
• Write a short
letter to the
ACLU in which
you present
your position.
• Be sure to
refer to
specific points
of the ad to
support your
argument.