Albanian migration * between brain drain and remittances

Download Report

Transcript Albanian migration * between brain drain and remittances

Albanian migration – between brain drain and remittances

C O N F E R E N C E O N I N T E R N A T I O N A L M I G R A T I O N 1 4 T H F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 4 E C O N O M I C R E S E A R C H I N S T I T U T E A T B A S

Ilir GEDESHI – Center for Economic and Social Studies (CESS)

Albnian Migration

Year of first migration experience, current migration and legalization in the destinations countries (in percent)

20,0 18,0 16,0 14,0 12,0 10,0 8,0 6,0 4,0 2,0 ,0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 First migration experience Current migration Legalization

Source: CESS Migrant Questionnaire, 2009/2010

Fig. 1. First migratory experience and year of migration in current host country

Albanian Migration/Push and pull factors

Source: CESS Migrant Questionnaire, 2006

Fig. 2. Main reasons for migrating in the 90’

Albanian Migration

50,0 45,0 40,0 35,0 30,0 25,0 20,0 15,0 10,0 5,0 0,0 37,0 34,3 19,7

Sector of employment in the country of migration during 2009

20,9 18,3 44,4 14,4 20,2 15,4 14,4 17,0 6,8 12,0 7,4 0,9 1,2 2,9 12,8 Greece Italy Others

Source: CESS Migrant Questionnaire, 2009/2010

Fig. 3. Employment sectors of Albanian migrants in host countries

Albanian Brain Drain

Source: CESS, 2008

Fig.4. Dynamics of Albanian brain drain: share of Academics moving abroad as % of total Academics (1990-2008)

Albanian Brain Drain

Albanian Brain drain by the countries of destination in 2008

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2.2

17.8

9.4

9.9

7.2

12.4

8.9

Austria Canada France Greece Germany Italy Other countries 2.9

UK 29.2

USA

Source: CESS, 2008

Fig. 5. Albanian brain drain by the country of destination in 2008 (in percent)

Albanian Brain Drain

Albain Brain Drain by Country of Destination and Year of Migration

50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 UK France Greece Italy Canada Germany USA

Source: CESS, 2008

Fig.6. Albanian Brain Drain by Country of Destination and Year of Migration (in %)

Diaspora Option

Albanian academics and researchers working abroad by country (%)

Other countries Germany Italy Canada Austria UK France USA 0 5 10 15 20 25

Source: CESS., Updating the database of overseas graduates, 2004

30 Percent

Fig. 7. Albanian academics and researchers working abroad by country

Brain Gain

Fig. 8. The conditions for the return of academics and researchers

Remittances

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

Source: Bank of Albania, 2014

Fig. 9. Volume of remittances in USD and Euros

Remittances USD Remittances EURO

Remittances

Remittances to Albania, as % of GDP, 1996 - 2011

18,00% 16,00% 14,00% 12,00% 10,00% 8,00% 6,00% 4,00% 2,00% 0,00%

Source: Bank of Albania, 2014

Fig.10. Remittances to Albania as percent of GDP

Remittances

Investments ALSMS, 2002

12%

ETF Study, 2007

11,8%

de Zwager et al., 2010

10% Table 3. Portion of remittances that is invested according to different studies

Remittances

Selected Data on Migrant Household (HH) Savings and Remittance Behaviour:

Monthly HH Income: Monthly Expenditures: Monthly Saving Rate: Annual HH Remittance Value: Annual HH Savings Rate:* Savings in 2008: Remittances 2008: Savings/Remittances Factor:

Albania

€ 2,300 € 1,477 € 855 € 1,664 € 10,260 € 3,473 Million € 672 Million 5.2

Kosovo

€ 3,900 € 2,324 € 1,578 € 3,212 € 15,724 € 2,340 Million € 479 Million 4.8

BiH**

€ 2,288 € 1,938 € 350 € 1,752 € 2,448 € 1,175 Million € 841 Million 1.4

* # Kosovar HH abroad: 149,000; # Albanian HH abroad: 404,000; Source: IASCI-NEXUS Field Research Dec-Jan 2008/9 ** The above BiH-specific figures are speculative as they are based on a conservative extrapolation of incomes, expenditures, savings and remittances behaviours of BiH migrant HHs in Austria. # BiH HH abroad: 480,000 based on 2.5 persons per HH of an estimated total number of 1.2 Mio BiH migrants abroad. Source: IASCI-NEXUS Study 2009

Conclusions