Transcript Air Security of North America DoD-DHS Capability Development Working Group (CDWG)

Air Security
of North America
DoD-DHS Capability Development Working Group
(CDWG)
Kevin “Spanky” Kirsch
Science and Technology Directorate
Department of Homeland Security
Director, Office of Special Programs
Jan 22, 2008
AntiTerrorism
NORAD/NORTHCOM
Customs & Border
Protection
Defense
(Military Response)
Security
(Law Enforcement
Response)
Airspace Defense
NORAD
CONR
Air Defense Assets
(WADS)(EADS)
Detect, Identify, Intercept,
Determine “Hostile”
Airspace Domain Security
Office of Air & Marine
Air & Marine Ops Center (AMOC)
Air & Marine LE Units
Shared
Information/
Responsibility
(Air Domain Awareness)
Border Defense
Law Enforcement and Sensor Data
Fusion, LE Technical Collections
Detect, Intercept, Determine Intent,
Interrogate, Arrest, Investigate,
Prosecute
Border Security
OFO OBP A&M
NORTHCOM
Border
Operations
(TARS, LRR, ROTHR)
Air Defense Sectors
JTF-N
POE SECTOR Air Branch
Shared
Information/
Responsibility
(Air Domain Awareness)
(TARS, LRR, ROTHR. Border Sensors,
Satellite trackers, National Systems)
Law Enforcement Interagency
Collaboration
Mexico and Canadian LE cooperation
Interior Air Defense
Long-Range Radar
Maritime Domain Awareness
Interior Air Security
Shared
Information/
Responsibility
(Air Domain Awareness)
Shared
Information/
Domain Awareness
Long-Range Radar
C3ISR & Interdiction Aircraft
Law Enforcement
Data/Collaboration
Maritime Domain
Awareness
Maritime Patrol Aircraft
Coastal and Great Lakes Patrol
Boats
Current Picture
AMOC Operations
Domestic
n
Border
n
Foreign
n
Caribbean
n
Intelligence
Border Operations
 Detection
 Identification
 Coordination
 Interception
 Monitoring
 Marine
 UAV Operations
AMOC Partners
DHS
FAA
CBP
DOD/ANG
TSA
NORAD
ICE
NORTHCOM
NASA
JIATF-S
Border Patrol
JTF-N
Secret Service
HIDTA
Coast Guard
IBET/IBIT
FBI
DEA/EPIC
STATE & LOCAL LEA
FOREIGN LEA
National Radar System Effort
•Long Range Radars (LRR)
•Wind Turbine issues
•Ongoing FAA / DOD / DHS Service Life Extension Programs can
keep some of these operating in the near to mid term (FAA
manages, DOD & DHS fund)
•Cost of extending other systems
•FAA transitioning from ground based primary and secondary radars to
the cooperative GPS based Automated Dependent Surveillance –
Broadcast (ADS-B) system
•ADS-B vulnerabilities
•Surveillance of non – ADS-B (non-cooperative) aircraft will still be
needed
•Issues debated at the JPDO forum
National Radar System Effort (cont)
•Over the Horizon Radar (OTHR) Working Group
•Collaboration with Australia
•Multifunction Phased Array Radar (MPAR) Program – Congressionally
mandated research task to evaluate MPAR as an alternative to
conventional radar for the full range of current and emerging applications
•MPAR could provide;
•An effective complement to the FAA GPS system
•Improved weather surveillance
•Improved surveillance of U.S. airspace for potential threat
•Wind turbine effects mitigation
•DOD and DHS must take an active role in assessing emerging
approaches to improving the Nation’s surveillance capabilities
Related Activities Are Not CoordinatedRecommend a Combined Interagency PO
Interested Agencies
DHS/CBP, TSA, USCG
DOT/FAA
DoC/NOAA
CDS
CANADA COMMAND
NAV CANADA
IAMD Architecture
NORAD
USNORTHCOM
USPACOM
USSTRATCOM
MDA
USSOUTHCOM
PACOM
Activities
SIGINT Integration
Notional Combined Interagency PO Charter
• Synchronize efforts to explore technologies and solutions with applications to
multi-agency, multi-domain missions
• Governance/Oversight of Combined Interagency Program Office
• Key focus areas:
1. Persistent (24/7/365) surveillance
2. Ability to cue HS / HD resources
3. Fratricide prevention
4. Info sharing with Interagency and Multinational Partners
• Develop and implement program plan and architecture
• Provide operational direction for technology development
• Inform related activities:
• National Strategy for Aviation Security
• Next Generation Air Transportation System
• Congressional Reports
DHS/DoD Sponsored Surveillance Summits
• Establish a framework for a future looking interagency strategy
for air and maritime surveillance in the United States .
• Incorporate the non-cooperative surveillance needs of homeland
defense and security agencies as fundamental components of the
Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) cooperative-based Next
Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) .
• Improve the existing maritime domain surveillance capabilities.
• DHS Summit held in CO Springs, June 2007
• DoD Summit to be held at Andrews AFB, 20-21 Feb 2008
Policy Outbrief Themes from June Summit
•Technology far exceeds policy – a concerted effort from all
players must be initiated to catch policy up with technology – this
may allow many needs to be met with systems/technologies that
all can work to fund, develop and procure
•Clarity of mission/jurisdiction – Since there are multiple key
players in different departments and agencies, there is confusion
regarding roles and responsibilities of each organization and a
lack of business rules to facilitate cross talk between the
organizations
•The definition of surveillance needs to be expanded to include all
facets of surveillance, to include cooperative/non-cooperative
detection and tracking, weather detection and tracking, and etc.
Contact Information
Kevin “Spanky” Kirsch
202.254.6425 (Office)
202.254.5823
(Fax)
UNCLAS- [email protected]
JWICS- [email protected]
BACKUP
SLIDES
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
• Detect airborne and
maritime terrorist/
smuggling events and
their associated illegal
alien and contraband
cargos
• Covert tracking devices
• Enforce borders at Ports
of Entry and between
Ports of Entry
US Coast Guard
• Maritime smuggling/
terrorism
• Maritime Domain
Awareness (MDA)
• Port Security
Secret Service
• Movement of POTUS
• National Special Security
Events
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE)
• Aviation smuggling
investigations
• Covert tracking devices
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA)
• Airspace control of areas
affected by natural and
manmade disasters