Fluid-Structure Coupling in a Water-Wedge Impact Problem Nicolas AQUELET, Mhamed SOULI, Nicolas COUTY

Download Report

Transcript Fluid-Structure Coupling in a Water-Wedge Impact Problem Nicolas AQUELET, Mhamed SOULI, Nicolas COUTY

Fluid-Structure Coupling
in a Water-Wedge
Impact Problem
Nicolas AQUELET, Mhamed SOULI, Nicolas COUTY
ASME/JSME PVP Division Conference - San Diego - July 25 - 29, 2004
Plan
 What ’s the purpose of this approach?
 How to make the modeling?
 Fluid-Structure Coupling
 Application to Slamming problem
 Conclusion
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
2
What ’s the purpose of this approach?
Why to modelize the impact
between a wedge and a free surface?
Answer: SLAMMING!
But what’s SLAMMING?…
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
3
What ’s the purpose of this approach?
2D-model
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
4
What ’s the purpose of this approach?
Bibliography: Some theoretical results
Assumptions:
2D Problem : ( x , y , t )
Rigid wedge
Constant drop velocity
Incompressible and no rotational fluid
No cushioning
??
p
x
Free surface
a
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
5
What ’s the purpose of this approach?
Bibliography: Some theoretical results
Wagner (1932), Zhao et Faltinsen (1993):
(Mpa)
Asymptotical Approach valid for a < 40
Pressure = f(time) for
a=30
Pressure = f(time) for a=10
at a fixed point of the
at a fixed point of the wedge
wedge
(sec)
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
6
What ’s the purpose of this approach?
Bibliography: Some theoretical results
Dobrovol ’skaya (1969), Garabeddian (1953):
If infinite wedge , the flow is self-similar
(x,y,t)
3 unknowns
x
( Vt
,
y
)
Vt
V: Constant drop velocity
x
2 unknowns
at t=t3
p
Free surface at t=t2
Free surface at t=t1
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
7
What ’s the purpose of this approach?
Bibliography: Some theoretical results
Dobrovol ’skaya (1969), Garabeddian (1953):
If infinite wedge , the flow is self-similar
For a finite wedge, this property is valid away from
the edges
Away from the leading edge :
Incompressibility?
Away from trailing edge
Free surface when the jet leaves the wedge
Free surface at t = 0sec
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
8
Plan
 What ’s the purpose of this approach?
 How to make the modeling?
 Fluid-Structure Coupling
 Application to Slamming problem
 Conclusion
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
9
How to make the modeling?
Material movement
Modeling problems:
 Large fluid deformations
 Fluid-Structure Interactions
State n
Two solutions:
Lagrangian Formulation
 Lagrangian Modeling of Fluid
 Fluid /Structure Contact
Eulerian Formulation
 Eulerian Modeling of Fluid
 Fluid/Structure Coupling
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
State n+1
State n+1
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
10
How to make the modeling?
Lagrangian Formulation
STRUCTURE:
Dynamic equations of the structure
FLUID:
Lagrangian Formulation of
Navier-Stokes Equations
vi

=  ij , j
t
vi

=  ij , j
t
e
 =  ij . ij
t
e
 =  ij . ij
t
Mass conservation is automatically
verified
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
11
How to make the modeling?
Lagrangian Formulation
Modeling of water flow with a Lagrangian Formulation:
Strong distortions of fluid meshes
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
12
How to make the modeling?
Eulerian formulation
STRUCTURE:
FLUID:
Dynamic equations of the structure
Eulerian Formulation of Navier-Stokes
Equations
vi

=  ij , j
t


=   .div( v )  v j .
t
x j
e
 =  ij . ij
t
vi
vi

=  ij , j   .v j
t
x j
e
e
 =  ij . ij   .v j
t
x j
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
13
How to make the modeling?
Split operator :
1st phase : Lagrangian cycle
Material movement
vi

=  ij , j
t
State n
e
 =  ij . ij
t
Intermediate state
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
14
How to make the modeling?
Split operator :
2nd phase : cycle of advection
Equations of transport

 V . = 0
t
 (0, x) = Lagrangian
solved by Godunov ’s methods
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
Intermediate state
State n+1
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
15
How to make the modeling?
Approche Eulérienne multi-matérielle
Introduction of a new unknown: the volume fraction
:
Volume Fraction =
Volwater
Volelement

 V . = 0
t
 (0, x) = Lagrangian
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
air
water
Intermediate state
1
0.7
Etat n+1
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
16
How to make the modeling?
Free surface tracking
by Young method (VOF: Volume Of Fluid)
air
0.71
0
?
0
1
0.3
0
1
1
0.5
Volume Fractions for 9 cells
are used to compute the
slope of the material
interface in the centre cell
water
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
17
How to make the modeling?
Lagrangian Formulation
Eulerian Formulation
contact >>> Transmission
of Interaction forces:
Coupling>>> Transmission
of Interaction forces:
structure nodes to fluid
nodes
structure nodes to fluid
particles
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
18
How to make the modeling?
Lagrangian Formulation
Geometric interface
Eulerian Formulation
Material interface
contact >>> Transmission
of Interaction forces:
Coupling>>> Transmission
of Interaction forces:
structure nodes to fluid
nodes
structure nodes to fluid
particles
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
19
Plan
 What ’s the purpose of this approach?
 How to make the modeling?
 Fluid-Structure Coupling
 Application to Slamming problem
 Conclusion
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
20
Fluid-Structure Coupling
At t = t
n-1/2
n
, no yet coupling and
At t = t ,
the velocity field is computed:
F is added to the forces
applied to the fluid particle
Structure
penetration
Fluid particle
at the
structure
zoom
node position
zoom
Computation of the
relative distance
Vf
Vs
n
d =d
n-1
+(Vs-Vf).dt
(here d
n-1
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
=0)
n
F = -k.d
k
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
21
Fluid-Structure Coupling
K???
Which K to respect the physical solution
of the interaction problem?
In theory:
the bigger the stiffness K,
the smaller the penetration d
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
22
Fluid-Structure Coupling
However:
If the stiffness K is too bigger,
the run becomes unstable
And:
If the stiffness K is too smaller,
the penetration becomes unacceptable
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
23
Fluid-Structure Coupling
At t = t
n
as
M
n
Fs
n
:
n
af
K
Mf
s
n
n
Ff
d

n
n
n
with a = s, f
Ma aa = Fa  Kd

n1/2 
n1
n  n1/2
 Vf
d = d   Vs
.dt = 0




n
n-1/2
n-1/2
n
n 

F
M
M
V
V
F
d
s f  s
f
Kdn =
 f  s
 2
Ms  Mf  Ms Mf
dt
dt 
Zhong’s work for contact-impact (1993): Defence node Algorithm
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
24
Fluid-Structure Coupling
Numerical example:Impact of water column
water
 = 1026kg.m 3
V0
V0 = 5m.s 1
c = 1500m.s 1
Excepted Pressure
in the Eulerian
cells near the wall:
cV0 = 7.7MPa
Rigid Wall
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
25
Fluid-Structure Coupling
Pressure at the impact for different timestep:
dt=6e-7sec
dt=1e-6sec
dt=6e-8sec
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
26
Fluid-Structure Coupling
Comparison with a model of reference :
V0
V0
Rigid Wall
Model with coupling
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
Eulerian
nodes are
blocked
Model of reference
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
27
Fluid-Structure Coupling
Comparison with a model of reference :
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
28
Fluid-Structure Coupling
An other numerical Example:Piston
V0
Structure
V0: constant
Fluid
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
29
Fluid-Structure Coupling
Model of reference
Model with coupling
V0
V0 is imposed on the
is imposed on the
Fluid boundary
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
Structure
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
30
Fluid-Structure Coupling
Comparison with a model of reference :
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
31
Plan
 What ’s the purpose of this approach?
 How to make the modeling?
 Fluid-Structure Coupling
 Application to Slamming problem
 Conclusion
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
32
Application to Slamming problem
V0=6m/s
element 50
30°
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
Reference theoretical pressure plotted
away from the edges
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
33
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison theory/coupling
The results disagree and the numerical curve is perturbed
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
34
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison theory/coupling by decreasing the time step
The results still disagree and the perturbations are stronger than previously
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
35
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of pressures applied on two
neighbouring structure elements
The curves are
almost
« symmetrical »
self-similarity is not respected
Influence between the structure element pressures
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
36
Application to Slamming problem
 Interessant approach: Impulse = momentum transmitted
to the structure (by unit area)
t
Impulse:
I =  p.dt
t0
t0
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
t
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
37
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of impulses applied on two
neighbouring structure elements
Influence between the structure element impulses
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
38
Application to Slamming problem
The coupling force computed by the Zhong ’s approach
seems to be too strong
n
n-1/2
n-1/2
n
n 

F
M
M
V
V
F
d
s f  s
f
Kdn = pf
 f  s
 2
Ms  Mf  Ms Mf
dt
dt 
A penalty factor is introduced in the Zhong ’s formula: 0<pf<1
The previous pressure and impulse curves are
plotted again by decreasing the penalty factor
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
39
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of pressures applied on two
neighbouring structure elements
pf=0.1
Influence between the structure element pressures
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
40
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of impulses applied on two
neighbouring structure elements
pf=0.1
Influence between the structure element impulses
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
41
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of pressures applied on two
neighbouring structure elements
pf=0.01
Small Influence between the structure element pressures
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
42
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of impulses applied on two
neighbouring structure elements
pf=0.01
Small Influence between the structure element impulses
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
43
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of pressures applied on two
neighbouring structure elements
Self-similarity is respected
pf=0.001
Very small Influence between the structure element pressures
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
44
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of impulses applied on two
neighbouring structure elements
pf=0.001
Very small Influence between the structure element impulses
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
45
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison theory/coupling with pf=0.001
The jet reaches the
trailing edge
The theoretical and numerical pressures agree
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
46
Application to Slamming problem
A mesh refinement enables to
converge more quickly
element
50
element
20
Reference theoretical pressure plotted
away from the edges
pf=0.001
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
47
Application to Slamming problem
Comparison of impulses for small penalty factor:
The momentum received by
the structure changes little
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
48
Application to Slamming problem
Deformable wedge: Comparison pf= 0.1 / pf=0.01
Von mises stress history
Displacement
history
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
49
Application to Slamming problem
Von Mises stress history for pf= 0.1 / pf=0.01
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
50
Application to Slamming problem
Displacement of node 132 for pf= 0.1 / pf=0.01
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
51
Application to Slamming problem
Displacement of node 170 for pf= 0.1 / pf=0.01
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
52
Plan
 What ’s the purpose of this approach?
 How to make the modeling?
 Fluid-Structure Coupling
 Application to Slamming problem
 Conclusion
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
53
Conclusion
 Zhong ’s coupling converge to solutions for simple
problems
 However, a penalty factor is required for slamming
problem
 The less the penalty factor is, the less the oscillations in
the coupling forces are. A good agreement with the
theory is obtained.
 The impulse for different penalty factor is almost identical.
Thus, the deformations of the structure for two different
stiffness are close.
Performed by LS-DYNA: Explicite Finite Element code
ASME/JSME PVP Conference - July 25-29, 2004
54