Transcript Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning Karl Smith University of Minnesota

Design & Implementation of
Cooperative Learning
Karl Smith
University of Minnesota
May 2005
Effective Course Design
EC 2000
Bloom’s
Taxonomy
Goals and
Objectives
Technology
Cooperative
learning
Students
Instruction
Lectures
Labs
Other
experiences
(Felder & Brent, 1999)
Course-specific
goals & objectives
Classroom
assessment
techniques
Assessment
Tests
Other
measures
2
Backward Design
Stage 1. Identify Desired Results
Stage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence
Stage 3. Plan Learning Experiences
and Instruction
3
Backward Design
Stage 1. Identify Desired Results
Filter 1. To what extent does the idea, topic, or
process represent a big idea or having
enduring value beyond the classroom?
Filter 2. To what extent does the idea, topic, or
process reside at the heart of the discipline?
Filter 3. To what extent does the idea, topic, or
process require uncoverage?
Filter 4. To what extent does the idea, topic, or
process offer potential for engaging
students?
4
Backward Design
Stage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence
Types of Assessment
Quiz and Test Items:
Simple, content-focused test items
Academic Prompts:
Open-ended questions or problems that
require the student to think critically
Performance Tasks or Projects:
Complex challenges that mirror the issues or
problems faced by graduates, they are authentic
5
Model 1
The Key Components Of INTEGRATED COURSE DESIGN
Learning
Goals
Teaching
and
Learning
Activities
Feedback &
Assessment
S ioft this
u amodel
t i o is
n that
a l it allows
F a c us
t otorsee
s the importance
One of the benefits
A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning
L. Dee Fink. 2003. Creating significant learning experiences. Jossey-Bass.
6
Worksheet 1
Worksheet for Designing a Course/Class Session
Learning Goals for
Course/Session:
Ways of Assessing
Actual Teaching-Learning
Helpful Resources:
This Kind of Learning:
Activities:
(e.g., people, things)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
Taxonomies
Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive
Domain (Bloom & Krathwohl, 1956)
A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A
revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives
(Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001).
Facets of understanding (Wiggins & McTighe, 1998)
Taxonomy of significant learning (Dee Fink, 2003)
8
The Six Major Levels of Bloom's Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain
(with representative behaviors and sample objectives)
Knowledge. Remembering information Define, identify, label, state, list, match
Identify the standard peripheral components of a computer
Write the equation for the Ideal Gas Law
Comprehension. Explaining the meaning of information Describe, generalize,
paraphrase, summarize, estimate
In one sentence explain the main idea of a written passage
Describe in prose what is shown in graph form
Application. Using abstractions in concrete situations Determine, chart, implement,
prepare, solve, use, develop
Using principles of operant conditioning, train a rate to press a bar
Derive a kinetic model from experimental data
Analysis. Breaking down a whole into component parts Points out, differentiate,
distinguish, discriminate, compare
Identify supporting evidence to support the interpretation of a literary passage
Analyze an oscillator circuit and determine the frequency of oscillation
Synthesis. Putting parts together to form a new and integrated whole Create,
design, plan, organize, generate, write
Write a logically organized essay in favor of euthanasia
Develop an individualized nutrition program for a diabetic patient
Evaluation. Making judgments about the merits of ideas, materials, or phenomena
Appraise, critique, judge, weigh, evaluate, select
Assess the appropriateness of an author's conclusions based on the evidence given
Select the best proposal for a proposed water treatment plant
9
Facets of Understanding
Wiggins & McTighe, 1998, page 44
When we truly understand,we
Can explain
Can interpret
Can apply
Have perspective
Can empathize
Have self-knowledge
10
Dee Fink – Creating Significant Learning Experiences
A TAXONOMY OF SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
1. Foundational Knowledge
• "Understand and remember" learning
For example: facts, terms, formulae, concepts, principles, etc.
2. Application

Thinking: critical, creative, practical (problem-solving, decision-making)

Other skills
For example: communication, technology, foreign language

Managing complex projects
3. Integration

Making "connections" (i.e., finding similarities or interactions) . . .
Among: ideas, subjects, people
4. Human Dimensions

Learning about and changing one's SELF

Understanding and interacting with OTHERS
5. Caring

Identifying/changing one's feelings, interests, values
6. Learning How to Learn

Becoming a better student

Learning how to ask and answer questions

Becoming a self-directed learner
11
Backward Design
Stage 3. Plan Learning Experiences & Instruction
 What enabling knowledge (facts, concepts, and
principles) and skills (procedures) will students need to
perform effectively and achieve desired results?
 What activities will equip students with the needed
knowledge and skills?
 What will need to be taught and coached, and how
should it be taught, in light of performance goals?
 What materials and resources are best suited to
accomplish these goals?
 Is the overall design coherent and effective?
12
14
Professor's Role in
Formal Cooperative Learning
1. Specifying Objectives
2. Making Decisions
3. Explaining Task, Positive Interdependence, and
Individual Accountability
4. Monitoring and Intervening to Teach Skills
5. Evaluating Students' Achievement and Group
Effectiveness
Problem Based Cooperative Learning Format
TASK: Solve the problem(s) or Complete the project.
INDIVIDUAL: Estimate answer. Note strategy.
COOPERATIVE: One set of answers from the group, strive for agreement,
make sure everyone is able to explain the strategies used to solve each
problem.
EXPECTED CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS: Everyone must be able to explain
the strategies used to solve each problem.
EVALUATION: Best answer within available resources or constraints.
INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY: One member from your group may be
randomly chosen to explain (a) the answer and (b) how to solve each
problem.
EXPECTED BEHAVIORS: Active participating, checking, encouraging, and
elaborating by all members.
INTERGROUP COOPERATION: Whenever it is helpful, check procedures,
answers, and strategies with another group.
Cooperative Lesson Planning Form
Gr a de Level: __________ Su bject Ar ea : ____________________ Da t e:__________
Lesson : ________________________________________________________________
Objectives
Aca dem ic: ______________________________________________________________
Tea m wor k Skills: _______________________________________________________
Preinstructional Decisions
Gr ou p Size: __________ Met h od Of Assign in g St u den t s: ____________________
Roles: _________________________________________________________________
Room Ar r a n gem en t : ____________________________________________________
Ma t er ia ls: _____________________________________________________________

On e Copy P er Gr ou p

On e Copy P er P er son

J igsa w

Tou r n a m en t

Ot h er : ______________________
Explain Task And Cooperative Goal Structure
1. Ta sk: _______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
2. Cr it er ia F or Su ccess: _________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
3. P osit ive In t er depen den ce: ____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
4. In dividu a l Accou n t a bilit y: ___________________________________________
Conversations in5.
Teaching and 6.
In t er gr ou p Cooper a t ion : ______________________________________________
Expected Behaviors: ____________________________________________________
17
Monitoring And Intervening
1. Obser va t ion P r ocedu r e: ______ F or m a l
______ In for m a l
2. Obser va t ion By: ______ Tea ch er ______ St u den t s ______ Visit or s
3. In t er venin g F or Ta sk Assist a n ce: _____________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
4. In t er venin g F or Tea m wor k Assist a n ce: ________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
5. Ot h er : ______________________________________________________________
Evaluating And Processing
1. Assessm en t Of Mem ber s’ In dividu a l Lea r n in g: _________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
2. Assessm en t Of Gr ou p P r odu ct ivit y: ___________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
3. Sm a ll Gr ou p P r ocessin g: _____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
4. Wh ole Cla ss P r ocessin g: _____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
5. Ch a r t s An d Gr a ph s Used: ____________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
6. P osit ive F eedba ck To E a ch St u den t : __________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
7. Goa l Set t in g F or Im pr ovem en t : _______________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
8. Celebr a t ion : _________________________________________________________
Conversations in
Teaching and
_____________________________________________________________________
9. Other: ______________________________________________________________
18
Group Ground Rules Contract Form
(Adapted from a form developed by Dr. Deborah Allen, University of Delaware)
Project groups are an effective aid to learning, but to work best they require that all
groups members clearly understand their responsibilities to one another. These project
group ground rules describe the general responsibilities of every member to the group.
You can adopt additional ground rules if your group believes they are needed. Your
signature on this contract form signifies your commitment to adhere to these rules and
expectations.
All group members agree to:
1. Come to class and team meetings on time.
2. Come to class and team meetings with assignments and other necessary
preparations done.
Additional ground rules:
1.
2.
If a member of the project team repeatedly fails to meet these ground rules, other
members of the group are expected to take the following actions:
Step 1: (fill in this step with your group)
If not resolved:
Step 2: Bring the issue to the attention of the teaching team.
If not resolved:
Step 3: Meet as a group with the teaching team.
The teaching team reserves the right to make the final decisions to resolve difficulties that
arise within the groups. Before this becomes necessary, the team should try to find a fair
and equitable solution to the problem.
Member’s Signatures:
Conversations in
Teaching and
Group Number:______________
1.____________________________
3.____________________________
2.____________________________
4.____________________________
19
Group Processing
B Plus/Delta Format B
Plus
Things That Group Did Well
Conversations in
Teaching and
Delta
Things Group Could Improve
20
We never educate directly, but indirectly by
means of the environment. Whether we permit
chance environments to do the work, or
whether we design environments for the
purpose makes a great difference.
John Dewey, 1906
It could well be that faculty members of the
twenty-first century college or university will find
it necessary to set aside their roles as teachers
and instead become designers of learning
experiences, processes, and environments
James Duderstadt, 1999
21