Kaon production at s experiment
Download
Report
Transcript Kaon production at s experiment
Kaon production at
sNN = 200 GeV
measured with the PHENIX
experiment
Momchil Velkovsky
SUNY at Stony Brook
For the PHENIX collaboration
What do we learn from K ?
From the p, K, p spectra: kinetic freeze
out conditions .
From K / K+: chemical potentials and
strangeness production mechanism.
Is it thermal?
Can shed light on the p suppression
versus p non-suppression puzzle at the
2-4 GeV pT range.
Is it a baryon or a mass effect?
PHENIX
PHENIX Detector
at Collision Point
East Carriage
Being Moved in Place
Ring Imaging Cerenkov
Drift Chamber
Beam-Beam Counter
Central Magnet
West Carriage
PHENIX PID
sTOF =120ps, K/p separation pT<2GeV/c
Corrections: decay in flight, acceptance,
reconstruction efficiency, multiplicity
dependent corrections ( embedding)
Kaon pT spectra
Mid rapidity, |y|<0.35
K+
Kcentrality
PHENIX Preliminary
PHENIX Preliminary
Characterized by mT exponential shape for all centralities
0- 5%
5 - 10 %
10 - 15 %
15 - 20 %
20 - 30 %
30 - 40 %
40 - 50 %
50 - 60 %
60 - 70 %
70 - 80 %
80 - 91 %
Freeze-out parameters
Simultaneous fit in range (mt -m0 ) < 1 GeV is shown. The top 5 centralities are scaled .
For the 5% central:
For the 80%-91% peripheral:
T = 0.5 0.2 syst. (< T> = 0.3 ± 0.2 syst. ) T = 0.7 ± 0.2 syst. (< T> = 0.5 ± 0.2 syst.)
Tfo = 135 23 MeV
Tfo = 110 23 MeV
<pT> vs. Npart
Syst.
error :
p (10%),
K (15%),
p (14%)
Increase of <pT> as a function of Npart and tends to saturate
p < K < p (p)
Only one parameter in the model: the initial pT kick.
-
Au+Au at
s NN =200GeV
K /K+
Centra
l
Flat pT dependence
Ratio close to 1
No centrality dependence
Somewhat lower in p-p
(comparable within errors)
Au+Au at
s NN =200GeV
Peripheral
p-p data (200 GeV)
Au+Au at
s NN =200GeV
p/p ratio
Central
Flat pT dependence for
central events.
Decreasing for
peripheral > 2.5 GeV?
p-p consistent with it
Au+Au at
s NN =200GeV
Peripheral
Estimate of Baryon Potential
Statistical thermal model
hep-ph/0002267 F.Becattini et al.
PHENIX preliminary (200 GeV),
central (0-10%)
(130GeV)
p-
p+
/
= 1.02 0.02 (stat) 0.1 (sys)
K- / K+ = 0.92 0.03 (stat) 0.1(sys)
p / p = 0.70 0.04 (stat) 0.1(sys)
Baryon chemical potential :
mB~ 30MeV at 200 GeV
mB~ 46MeV at 130 GeV
dN/dy per participant pair
Au+Au at
s NN =200GeV
p-
p-
p
p
Pion production almost linear with Npart
Kaon production raises faster than Npart
Hydro model fails for Npart < 100
K/pi versus Npart
syst.
error
12%
Rising with Npart ,
Similar behaviour observed at AGS and SPS
K0s measurement in PHENIXmotivation
Pions are suppressed, p, p up to 4 GeV/c are not
Is this due to their masses or to the hadronization
mechanism (baryons vs. mesons)?
Like p0, K0s can be extended to high pT.
K0s measurement in PHENIX
Br (K0s p+p-)=68.8%
Search for p+p- pairs with invariant
mass around m(K0s)=497.7 MeV
Mix events with the same centrality and
vertex. Do pair cuts.
K0s p+pcentral
+foreground
+background
m (GeV)
K0s p+pcentral
subtracted
m (GeV)
Conclusions
From the measured p+,p-,K+,K-,p,p spectra:
T=0.70.2, TFO=110 23 MeV, mB~30 MeV for the
most central events at s =200 GeV
The K+/K- ratio is flat in pT and centrality,
consistent with thermal production
K yield grows faster than Npart and faster than p
Hydrodynamic models describe anti-proton <pT>,
but fail for meson dN/dy, <pT> and the K/p ratio in
peripheral events (Npart<150)
Measuring K0s up to high pT will shed light on the
p-p puzzle.
Extra slides
The Parameters Tfo and T vs. Npart
• Expansion parameters
in each centrality
• Overall systematic
uncertainty is shown.
• A trend with
increasing Npart is
observed:
– Tfo and
T
• Saturates at midcentral