The Quenching of Beauty James Dunlop Brookhaven National Laboratory

Download Report

Transcript The Quenching of Beauty James Dunlop Brookhaven National Laboratory

The Quenching of Beauty
Last Hope for a Grey Probe of the QGP
James Dunlop
Brookhaven National Laboratory
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
1
The Promise of Jet Tomography
=
+
• Simplest way to establish the properties of a
system
– Calibrated probe
– Calibrated interaction
– Suppression pattern tells about density profile
• Heavy ion collisions
– Hard processes serve as calibrated probe
– Suppression provides density measure
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
2
The Limitations of RAA: “Fragility”
K.J. Eskola, H. Honkanken, C.A. Salgado, U.A. Wiedemann, Nucl. Phys. A747 (2005) 511
Central RAA Data
Increasing density
A. Dainese, C. Loizides, G. Paic, Eur. Phys. J. C38(2005) 461
Surface bias leads effectively to saturation of RAA with density
Challenge: Increase sensitivity to the density of the medium
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
3
Black and White
S.S. Adler et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 232301 (2005)
• Medium extremely black to hadrons, limiting sensitivity to density
• Medium transparent to photons (white): no sensitivity
• Is there something grey?
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
4
Calibrated Interaction? Grey Probes
• Problem: interaction with the
medium so strong that
information lost: “Black”
• Significant differences
between predicted RAA,
depending on the probe
• Experimental possibility:
recover sensitivity to the
properties of the medium by
varying the probe
11/1/2007
Wicks et al, Nucl. Phys. A784 (2007) 426
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
5
Gluons vs Quarks: Method
200 GeV p+p
1.
q jets or g jets  gluon jet contribution to protons is significantly larger
than to pions at high pT in p+p collisions at RHIC; pbar/ < 0.1 from quark
jet fragmentation at low beam energy . STAR Collaboration, PLB 637, 161 (2006).
2.
From Kretzer fragmentation function, the g/q jet contribution is similar to
AKK. S. Kretzer, PRD 62, 054001 (2000).
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
6
Gluons vs. Quarks: No shade of gray
gluon jet
quark jet
quark jet
STAR Collaboration, PRL 97 (152301) 2006
•
•
•
•
Gluons should lose more energy than quarks
Pions have larger quark contribution than protons
SO, Protons should be more suppressed than pions
Experimentally NOT observed: equal suppression for pT>6 GeV/c
– Perhaps: If medium already black to quarks, can’t be blacker than black
• Other methods to be tried: kinematics in h (as done in e.g. dijet Sivers)
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
7
Charm/Beauty: No shade of gray
STAR, PRL 98 (2007) 192301
PHENIX, PRL 98 (2007) 172301
• Unexpectedly strong suppression of non-photonic electrons a major issue
– Calls into question the calibration of the interaction of the probe with the medium
• Uncertainties in B contribution: need to measure c and b separately
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
8
Mechanisms for Energy Loss
“Passage of Particles through Matter”, Particle Data Book
Bremsstrahlung
Radiative dE/dx
• QED: different momenta, different mechanisms
• Just beginning the exploration of this space in QCD
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
9
Calibrated Probe? Electrons in p+p
STAR, PRL 98 (2007) 192301
b
Crossing from c to b:
anywhere from 3-10 GeV
c
• Large uncertainties in non-photonic electrons, even in p+p
– STAR and PHENIX factor of 2 discrepancy in measurements
•
STAR: runs 8 and 9 low material (same as PHENIX), PHENIX…?
– Theoretical uncertainties, esp. in b vs. c contribution
• Need to measure c and b separately, in all systems, with precision
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
10
Correlations
• RHIC: 10-1 to 10-3 level
• WMAP: 10-5 level
– One sample
– Only photons
– Well-defined separation of
sources
– Multiple samples
– Multiple probes
– Model dependence in separation of
sources
• quite a few “two-component” models,
with different components
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
11
Heavy Flavor Correlations
+
eKe
D0
D*0
B-
Flavor creation
c
g

b
b
D0
B+

Isolate b from c
K+
Isolate production mechanism
In medium: what is losing energy, and how much?
c
g
gluon splitting/fragmentation
c
-
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
c
g
g
g
g
0
12
Correlations: Can we tell how much beauty?
Xiaoyan Lin, QM2006
• Use e-h Correlation
– Large B mass compared to D
– Semileptonic decay: e gets larger
kick from B.
– Broadened e-h correlation on nearside.
• Extract B contribution
– Use PYTHIA shapes
• Con: Model dependent
• Pro: Depends on decay kinematics
well described
– Fit ratio B/(B+D)
• There is more information from
correlations that is not currently
being used (momentum, charge,
etc.)
11/1/2007
e-h from B
e-h from D
Fit
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
13
B contribution to NP electrons vs. pT
•
Fit e-h correlation with PYTHIA Ds
and Bs
•
Non-zero B contribution
•
Contribution consistent with FONLL
– Model dependent (PYTHIA)
– Depends mainly on kinematics of
D/B decay (not Fragmentation)
•
Xiaoyan Lin, QM2006
p+p 200 GeV
Dominant systematic uncertainty:
– photonic background rejection
efficiency
– Additional uncertainties under study
• There is more information from
correlations that is not currently
being used
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
14
Future at RHIC: “RHIC II” or the fb era
STAR HFT
90
80
Current Au Run, year 7
70
60
Peak Luminosity
Previous Au Run, year 4
50
Ave. Luminosity
40
Beam Current
30
20
10
2014
2012
2010
2008
2006
2004
0
2002
PHENIX VTX
One year at RHIC II ~ 30 nb-1
30 nb-1*1972 =~ 1 fb-1 p+p equivalent
• RHIC: luminosity + upgraded detectors for precision
– Beauty: last hope for a “grey” probe; needs detector upgrades to both
STAR and PHENIX to isolate from charm
– g-jet: precision probe of energy loss
– Upsilon: precision tests of Debye screening with a “standard candle”
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
15
Grey Correlations: Heavy Flavor in the fb era
Heavy flavor
Light Hadrons
Inclusive Spectra
Correlations
From 5 pb-1
Identified heavy flavor correlations: promising, but statistical power still low
RHIC II: many orders of magnitude (>~x1000 with luminosity, S/B improvements)
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
16
Quarkonium: Upsilon
RHIC
Proof of principle measurement: run 6 p+p
Upsilon(1S+2S+3S)→e+e-
Sequential dissociation of quarkonia to measure energy density of plasma
Requires full luminosity of RHIC II for definitive measurements
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
17
Other initiatives: Muons and dileptons
• Muon Tracking Detector: use magnet steel as absorber
– Physics: dileptons from intermediate mass up to quarkonia states
– Best method for separating Upsilon states (a la CDF)
– R+D stage: Brookhaven LDRD 2007-2008
• Dielectrons using TOF for ID and HFT for background rejection
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
18
Conclusion
Idunn’s Apples of Youth, D’Alair’s Book of Norse Mythology
Is Beauty Grey?
We need more apples to tell
Watershed in coming years from RHIC II luminosity and detector upgrades
– Precision studies with g, b, c, and associated multi-hadron correlations
– IF beauty is less suppressed than other parton species, we will be able to probe
the properties of the QGP with exquisite precision
11/1/2007
Heavy Quark Workshop, Berkeley
19