Transcript Document 7563792

DoDAF-DM2 2.02
12 August 2010
DoDAF Development Team
Briefing Outline
• Recap: DoDAF-DM2 Configuration
Management and Update Cycles
• 2.0  2.01  2.02  2.03 Overview
• Demonstrations
– Using the DoDAF Data Dictionary, Aliases, and Model
Mappings tool
– Navigating the Logical Data Model tool
• Summary
Version Control
• Initial baseline DoDAF 2.0 released May 2009
• 2.01 released Feb 2010
– 2.01 Version Description Document (VDD) describes changes
made in response to Action Items
• 2.02 to be released 26 Aug 2010
– 2.02 VDD
– New baseline published on public and DKO DoDAF and DoD EA
COI namespace in DoD Meta Data Registry
• 2.03 planned for Fed 2011
– DoDAF-DM2 Action Item tracker identifies planned items
– New and other currently deferred AI’s will be prioritized by
DoDAF-DM2 Working Group with Federated Architecture
Council (FAC) oversight
2.0
2.01
2.01
2.02
May 2009
Aug 2009
Feb 2010
Aug 2010
2.03
Feb 2011
Relevant Governance
Process Documents
• Architecture Standards Review Group
CONOPS
– Roles, Responsibilities, and Processes
– ASRG -- FOGO / SES level
– Federated Architecture Council – 06 level
• DoDAF and DM2 CM Plan
– Configuration Identification
– Organizational Roles, Responsibilities, and
Interactions
– CM Processes and Procedures
– CM Business Rules
– DoDAF & DM2 WG EA COI
• COI POA&M
• COI Data Management Working Group
– Meets Quarterly, 1st meeting was 2 July 2010
• COI Metrics
DISA
DISA
DISA
Marine
Corps
Army
DoN
AF
NSA
FAC is Small Formal Voting Body
WG is Large Collaborative
* Some C/S/A have
multiple members
Framework
Groups
• OMG / INCOSE / NDIA
• MODAF / NAF / TOGAF
• FEA / FSAM
Core Process
Stakeholders
• CJCSI revs
• AT&L SoSE & Acq Reform
• Combatant Command
architectures
• CPM Governance
• PA&E
DoD
CIO
• DoDAF-DM2 Configuration Status Accounting
Report (CSAR)
• DoDAF-DM2 Baseline Status
• DoDAF-DM2 WG Activity Summaries
• COI Metrics and Progress Report
DNI
CIO
AT&L
P&R
USD(I)
DCMO
JCS J6
DoDAF-DM2 Change Requests •
COI Guidance •
DoDAF-DM2 Action Item Prioritization •
DoDAF-DM2 Baseline Direction •
STRATCOM
JFCOM
FAC – Voting – 23* votes
Framework &
Ontology Groups
• OMG / INCOSE / NDIA
• IDEAS / NAF
• UCORE
• Enterprise Vocabularies
DoDAF-DM WG – Collaborative – Agreed-upon business rules
enable analysis of different opinions
Vendors
• EA/ITA Tool
• M&S
• Data Analysis
• Repository
• Data Integration
Data Exchange
• Pilots
• Early Adopters
• Federation
COI Coordination
Groups
• DoD MDR WG
• DoD COI Forum
To join, go to www.silverbulletinc.com/DoDAF-DM2
• 230+
members
• Meets
weekly
Monthly Report to FAC
• Purposes:
– Full visibility of WG activities and
plans
– Opportunity for FAC prioritization
– Formal level of interaction
• FAC is formal voting body – WG
is collaborative
• Action Item / Change Request
Status
• Configuration Status
Accounting Report
– Summary of WG activities
– Action Item Summary
– Detailed status of all open Action
Items
DM2
In Ver 2.02
In Progress for 2.02
In Progress for 2.03
Unassigned
Consult IDEAS Group
Defer
Rejected
No Action Required
26
6
26
85
15
92
0
0
250
26
3
25
67
14
84
0
0
CI
DoDAF
0
3
0
18
1
5
0
0
COI
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
250
2.00  2.01  2.02  2.03
Overview
2.00
• DM2 CDM, LDM, PES
– 12 DM2 data groups
• 52 Models
2.01
2.02
70 Action Items
29 Action Items
• IDEAS v1.0 alignment
• Measures
• Representation, Names,
Descriptions
• Structured Service
Description
• Reification
• Structured Desired Effect
• Properties and Measures
generalized and better
aligned with IDEAS and
JFCOM JMT needs
• Reification diagram to
explain requirements,
design levels, and
traceability for SE
community
• Consolidate Activity, Goal,
diagrams
• Simplified complex tuples
(triples, tuples as places)
• Redundant associations
• Re-organized type orders,
e.g., for information and
data
• Added more structure to
Agreement
• Made higher-order typing
consistent
• Some XSD cleanup from
pilot feedback
2.03 (in-planning)
25 AI’s currently queued
85 new AI’s to review
• State machine diagram
• Temporal Flow diagram
• DoDAF Models revised to
match DM2 terminology
better
• Core process required
datasets
• More structure to Rules and
Agreement
• Services reification and joint
action
• Ontologic structure for
Command Relationships
• Basis for authority
• Vision vs. Desired Effect
• IDEAS Set Theory Unions
(for mappings)
Demonstration Use of the
DoDAF Data Dictionary,
Aliases, and Model Mappings
tool
DoDAF-DM2 Data Dictionary
• Model terms and aliases
• Many useful fields to filter
on, e.g.,
– Aliases
– CDM?
– DM2 Submodel
Applicability (12 columns)
– DoDAF Legacy Model
Applicability (52 columns)
Fields
DoDAF-DM2 Term
Definition
Potentially Related
Terms or Aliases
Status
Source Definitions
Definition Rationale,
Further work, other
Comments
Examples
Association?
CDM?
Who
DM2 Submodel
Applicability
DoDAF Legacy Model
Applicability ("Monster
Matrix")
Name of concept or
relationship
Agreed-upon definition
Aliases are kept in the data
dictionary
In model, alias, external, new
Multiple sources maintained
Is this a relationship?
Is this in the Conceptual Data
Model
Primary investigator
Which of the 12 DM2
submodels does this apply?
Which of the 52 AV-1 through
DIV-3 does this apply?
Navigating the Logical Data
Model tool
Not used yet
Introductory Diagrams
IDEAS Foundation Diagrams
Foundation – DoDAF “bridge”
DoDAF domain diagrams
All the association classes
All the foundation classes
Location and Measure classes
Metadata (AV-1, Pedigree, Security)
DoDAF domain classes
• Done in
Sparx
Enterprise
Architect
with Model
Futures
IDEAS
Profile
loaded
• Can use
EALite free
read-only
viewer
• Can use
browsable
HTML
report on
DoDAF
websites
Summary
• The basic structure of DoDAF / DM2 is holding
up well.
• Refinements by the community are making it
simpler, clearer, and more responsive to DoD’s
needs.
• Pilots and early adopters – Government and
vendors are very helpful.
• The GFI database scripts and PES queries are
speeding adoption of DoDAF 2.
• Core process dataset requirements should lead
to the end of “checklist architectures”.
Questions?