Document 7535806

Download Report

Transcript Document 7535806

The Army Plan
Purpose
• Develop strategic planning guidance
with senior leadership direction
• Prepare mid-term, mission-oriented planning
guidance using the strategic guidance
• Translate mission-oriented planning guidance into
functionally-oriented programming guidance
5/24/2016
Goal -Planning influencing the Army’s Program,
Budget and actual implementation
1
Army Planning Guidance
Using MAPIT to Focus Analysis
Illustrative and
not Actual MDEP Analysis
Relative Resourcing of MDEP
to Program Requirement
High level of resourcing but
low level of importance to
Mission Area Capabilities
8
7
FPMM
5/24/2016
FPMC
FPHG
6
RJS1
RB12
5
4
3
2
1
0
FPSA
FPLB
MU17
FPHC
FPTA
FPSB
FPMJ
FPSS
FPFE
FPFF
RJL4
FPDB
FPSN
FPFR
FL6P
FPEF
FPDT
FPDE
RG04
FL6Y
FPMH
FPSM
FPER
MT5Y
FPHB
RA35
FPEP
FPMA
MX5T
RJC5
FPEG
FPDD
FPFJ
RF02
FPFB
FPSC
FPLK FPEH
FPEL
FPJBFPJC
RF01
FPJA
FLTT
FL8G
FPFP
FPDH
RD16
FPQF
FPLF
RN04
FPDQ
FASP
RD15
FTRC
RA08
RD12
RJT7
FPLC
RJL7
FPLR
FL6Q
RB03
RK12
RL02
RL11
RL07
RL04
AR1R
FPLE
FPQS
RK01
SPDP
FPFD
FADI
E3RC
RA09
FPDG
FPEE
RK14
RD13
RJC0
RE04
RJS2
FL8D
RJT0
RK15
FPED
RK16
RK20
MS4B
TAFM
RK13
RK17
FPLP
RL03
MSEC
FPFK
MXET
RJC7
RF03
VARY
VTRD
RK10
RN13
RK02
RK11
RN08
RK03
0
Least Important
MDEPS
Most Important
MDEPs
1
2
RH01
FPDP
FPDL
3
4
5
Relative
MDEP Importance
Relative
Importance
of MDEP to(MA)
Mission Area Capabilities
High level of importance to
Mission Area Capabilities but
low level of resourcing
2
The Army Plan
and Program - Budget Cycle
Jan 00
Apr 00
Jul 00
Sep 00
POM issues
POM
FY02-07
PBD
BES
FY02-03
Jan 01
Apr 01
PresBud
FY02-03
Jul 01
Sep 01
POM issues
PBD
POM
Jan 02
PresBud
FY 03
BES
FY 03-07
FY 03
POM prep
BES prep
POM prep
BES prep
POM prep
FY02-07
FY02-03
Update FY03-07
FY03
FY 04-09
Section III.
APGM
(-- Dec 2000)
Section I.
Army Strategic Planning
Guidance
5/24/2016(-- Jun 2000)
Section II.
Army Plan
Guidance
(-- Oct 2000)
The
Army
Plan
FY03-17
Update
3
The Army Plan
Background
F
O
R
C
E
XXI
The Army Plan
FY 1998 – 2013 (U)
For Official Use Only
THE
ARMY
PLAN
FY 2000 - 2015 (U)
December 1995
Classified By: LTG Blackwell, DCSOPs, HQDA
Reason: 1.5(b)
Declassify on: December 2005
For Official Use Only
TAP FY98-13
• Some strategic guidance
in Sections 1 - 4
• Programming guidance
in Section 5, across
14 sub-sections
5/24/2016
24 March 1998
TAP FY00-15
• First “Reengineered” TAP
• Examined and used best
practices including
other Services & OSD
• Organized into 3 Sections
• Included 10 Mission Areas
• Approved by
Sec Army & CSA
TAP FY02-17
• Replaced 10 with 7 new
Mission Areas
• Applied transformation
strategy
• Produced draft ASPG
• Produced draft APG -used TAA/MTOFs
• Produced approved APGM
4
The Army Plan
Overview
Section I
Army Strategic Planning
Guidance (ASPG) DAMO-SS
• Relates National, OSD, and
Joint strategic guidance
• Provides Army leadership’s
vision and guidance
SA & CSA
approve each Section
Section II
5/24/2016
Feedback
Section III
Section II
Army Planning Guidance
(APG)
DAMO-ZR
• Expands upon Mission
Areas from ASPG
• Identifies capabilities to
accomplish missions
Feedback
Army Programming Guid.
Memo (APGM)
PAED
• Uses capabilities from
APG
• Identifies objectives and
resource tasks by PEG
Section II
Army
Planning
Guidance
- Annex -
5
The Army Plan
Incorporates Transformation Strategy
“WHAT WE WILL LOOK LIKE”
Army
Vision
The
12 OCT 99
END STATE
Army
Plan
“HOW WE WILL GET THERE”
Army
Strategy
(ASPG)
FY02-17
1 NOV 99 (DRAFT)
END STATE
GOALS
LINKAGE TO END STATE
GENERAL LOGIC
GENERAL PHASING
Section
I.
ASPG
Section
II.
APG
Long-term strategy
‘sets azimuth’
Mid-term capabilities
Section
III.
APGM
Mid-term
program guidance
Program
Objective
Memorandum
FY 02-07
“WHO DOES WHAT BY WHEN”
Transformation
BDE TRANSFORMATION
Campaign
Plan
15 JAN 00
RESPONSIBILITIES / TERMS OF REFERENCE
MILESTONES
METRICS / ASSESSMENT PROCESS
MONITOR MECHANISM
NOT PROGRAMMATIC,
BUT FEEDS PROGRAMMATICS
5/24/2016
6
The Army Plan
Strategic Nuclear War
Covers the Spectrum…
Reduce
Potential
Conflicts
& Threats
Promote
Regional
Stability
Domestic
Disaster Relief
Deter
Aggression
& Coercion
Counter
Terrorism
Raids Strikes
Tactical
Regional
Nuclear
Conventional
War
Conflict
Limited
International
Conventional
War
Conflict
CounterInsurgency
Security Assistance
Domestic
Civil Support
Arms
Control
Environmental
Peace
Operations
Making
Provide
Domesti
c
Support
Peace
Building
Spectrum
Support
Homeland
Defense
Deploy,
Fight, and
Win
MTWs
Conduct
SSC
Operation
s
Peace
Counter
Enforcement
Drug
Show
of
Nation
Sanctions
Force
Assistance
Enforcement
Non-Combatant
Peace
Humanitarian
Evacuation
Keeping
Occupations
7 Mission Areas -Responsive & Dominant
across the
Spectrum of Operations
Army Planning Guidance
DCSOPS
Considers MTOF Scenarios
CINC
Intent
Section II
Strategic
Theater
Objectives
Mission Task Organized Force
(MTOF) Regional Scenarios
Army
Planning
Guidance
Strategic
Theater
Concept
- Annex -
Peace Enforcement - Balkans
Noncombatant Evacuation
Operation - Nigeria
Peacekeeping - Peru/Ecuador
Essential
UJTL
Tasks
Peacekeeping - Sinai
Conditions
Humanitarian Assistance - Congo
Maritime Interdiction Operation - Iran
Counter Drug - Columbia
Standards
Consequence Management
National Missile Defense
TAA
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Force Structure
TOF
Disaster Relief
Base Engagement Force
Base Generating Force
Major Theater War
Universal Joint
Task List
(UJTL)
MTOF
Army Planning Guidance
Uses “METL-like” Structure
7 Mission Areas
• Promote Regional Stability
• Reduce Potential Conflicts
and Threats
• Deter Aggression and Coercion
• Conduct SSC Operations
• Deploy, Fight, and Win MTWs
• Support Homeland Defense
• Provide Domestic Support
Section II
Mission Area Structure
Mission Area (definition)
• Objectives
– Tasks
• Capabilities
– Performance
Standards
Prioritizes
5/24/2016
9
Army Planning Guidance
Provides Capabilities-Based Planning
Planning
Programming/Budgeting
A Task may be required
in more than one Mission Area; and
a Capability may be required in
more than one Task
MA1
Cap1
Task1
Task2
Cap2
Cap3
Reducing or eliminating resources for
a Task or Capability in one Mission Area,
does not change requirement for the same
Task or Capability in another MA
MA2
Task3
Cap1
Task1
Task4
Cap4
Cap5
MA1
Task5
Cap1
Task1
Task2
Cap2
Cap3
MA2
Task3
Cap1
Task 1
Task4
Cap 4
Cap5
Task5
Capability-Based Planning involves-• Identifying all required capabilities to accomplish each Mission Area
• And, if a later decision alters a mission or reduces or eliminates resources
for task or capability in a Mission Area, this decision
does not change requirement for capability in other Mission Area
Army Planning Guidance
Mission Area Wiring Diagram
DCSOPS
ODCSOP & Secretariat
Co-leads at
Mission Area Level
(LTG Ellis)
ADCSOPS
DAMO-ZR
(MG Kensinger)
(COL Palmatier)
DAMO-SS
DAMO-
DAMO-OD
(General Officer)
(General Officer)
(General Officer)
PRS
PCT
MTW
SHD
SSC
DAC
PDS
DAMO-SSP
DAMO-SSD
DAMO-SSW
COL ____
COLBrown
COL Brown
DAMO-SSW
DAMO-
DAMO-ODO
DAMO-ODS
COL Brown
COL ____
LTC Scott
COL Fitton
DUSA-IA
DUSA-IA
ASA(ALT)
ASA(M&RA)
ASA(M&RA)
ASA(M&RA)
SAUS
COL Morgan
COL Grabowski
Mr. Damstetter
COL Demasi
LTC Hersey
COL Smoot
VACANT
MAs provide a deliberate link from strategic guidance to essential capabilities.
5/24/2016
11
Army Planning Guidance
Linking Capabilities To Programming
Mission Area To Programming Integration Tool (MAPIT)
provides the means for linking and defining the importance
of a specific MDEP to a specific Capability
Mission Area Hierarchy
MSN AREA
PEG Hierarchy
PEG
1
1
OBJ 1
Task 1
Task 2
Sub-OBJ 2
Sub-OBJ 1
Capability 1
OBJ 1
Capability 2
Capability 3
TASK 1
MDEP A
MDEP B
TASK 2
TASK 3
TASK 4
MDEP C
MDEP D
Planning to Programming relationship -5/24/2016
• A Mission Area Capability may receive resources from many MDEPs
• An MDEP may support many Mission Area Capabilities
12
The Army Plan
The Intent
Use Operationally Focused Planning
To Shape and Defend the Army Program
TAP
Section III
THE WHITE
HOUSE
DECEMBER
1999
Army
Programming
Guidance
Memorandum
The Army Vision:
Soldiers on
point
Man Tng Eq Org Sust Inst
for the Nation
Promote Regional Stability
transforming the
Reduce Potential Conflicts and Threats
most respected
Army
Army in the
Deter Aggression and Coercion
Planning
POM:
world into a
Guidance:
Conduct Smaller Scale Contingency Ops Capabilities
Capabilities
Resourced
strategically
Deploy,
Fight
&
Win
Major
Theater
Wars
Required
responsive force
Support Homeland Defense
that is dominant
Provide Domestic Support
across the full
spectrum of
OSD Issues
operations
Army POM &
(APGM)
TAP
Section I
Army
Strategic
Planning
Guidance
(ASPG)
Transformation
Strategy
TAP
Section II
Army
Planning
Guidance
(APG)
Mission Areas
and Capabilities
MDEPs Resourced
Budget Estimate
and
Army Answers
Army Planning Guidance
Using MAPIT to Focus Analysis
Illustrative and
not Actual MDEP Analysis
Relative Resourcing of MDEP
to Program Requirement
High level of resourcing but
low level of importance to
Mission Area Capabilities
8
7
FPMM
5/24/2016
FPMC
FPHG
6
RJS1
RB12
5
4
3
2
1
0
FPSA
FPLB
MU17
FPHC
FPTA
FPSB
FPMJ
FPSS
FPFE
FPFF
RJL4
FPDB
FPSN
FPFR
FL6P
FPEF
FPDT
FPDE
RG04
FL6Y
FPMH
FPSM
FPER
MT5Y
FPHB
RA35
FPEP
FPMA
MX5T
RJC5
FPEG
FPDD
FPFJ
RF02
FPFB
FPSC
FPLK FPEH
FPEL
FPJBFPJC
RF01
FPJA
FLTT
FL8G
FPFP
FPDH
RD16
FPQF
FPLF
RN04
FPDQ
FASP
RD15
FTRC
RA08
RD12
RJT7
FPLC
RJL7
FPLR
FL6Q
RB03
RK12
RL02
RL11
RL07
RL04
AR1R
FPLE
FPQS
RK01
SPDP
FPFD
FADI
E3RC
RA09
FPDG
FPEE
RK14
RD13
RJC0
RE04
RJS2
FL8D
RJT0
RK15
FPED
RK16
RK20
MS4B
TAFM
RK13
RK17
FPLP
RL03
MSEC
FPFK
MXET
RJC7
RF03
VARY
VTRD
RK10
RN13
RK02
RK11
RN08
RK03
0
Least Important
MDEPS
Most Important
MDEPs
1
2
RH01
FPDP
FPDL
3
4
5
Relative
MDEP Importance
Relative
Importance
of MDEP to(MA)
Mission Area Capabilities
High level of importance to
Mission Area Capabilities but
low level of resourcing
14
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF MAPIT
Web-based, User Friendly Interface Provides:
• Hierarchy • Rating Bars • General Information
• Definitions • Reports
• Help
MAPIT generates the interface
and stores inputs by using:
• Current Planning Database (TAP MAS)
• Current Programming Database (PROBE)
Quality Function Deployment
(QFD):
• Used to determine the relative
importance of MDEPs.
• Systematic, straight forward, well
defined approach.
Prioritized MDEPs
(Based on Mission Area)
5/24/2016
15
The Army Plan
and Program - Budget Cycle
Jan 00
Apr 00
Jul 00
Sep 00
POM issues
POM
FY02-07
PBD
BES
FY02-03
Jan 01
Apr 01
PresBud
FY02-03
Jul 01
Sep 01
POM issues
PBD
POM
Jan 02
PresBud
FY 03
BES
FY 03-07
FY 03
POM prep
BES prep
POM prep
BES prep
POM prep
FY02-07
FY02-03
Update FY03-07
FY03
FY 04-09
Section III.
APGM
(-- Dec 2000)
Section I.
Army Strategic Planning
Guidance
5/24/2016(-- Jun 2000)
Section II.
Army Plan
Guidance
(-- Oct 2000)
The
Army
Plan
FY03-17
Update
16
The Army Plan
Summary
• Provides operationally mission-oriented
planning guidance
• Incorporates Transformation Strategy
• Integrates SECRETARIAT, ARSTAF
and MACOM inputs
• Links Planning Capabilities to
Programming MDEPs
ADCSOPS support is essential
for TAP success
5/24/2016
Soldiers on point ...
17