Post LHC: How is Europe getting prepared?

Download Report

Transcript Post LHC: How is Europe getting prepared?

Post LHC: How is Europe getting prepared?
R. Aleksan
CPPM/IN2P3
Larry Sulak Festschrift
October 21, 2005
The CPPM and its surroundings is an
inspiring place to think about major issues in HEP









What are the fundamental interactions and can they be unified?
What are the elementary constituents of matter?
How is the matter antimatter asymmetry generated?
How does the elementary constituents acquire their mass?
What is the nature of the dark universe?
Is gravity understood and are there extra dimensions?
What is the nature and properties of the neutrino?
What is the origin of the HE/UHE cosmic rays?
…
How are we going to address these questions?
I believe several answers/hints will come from the LHC
The LHC is a reality…
The LHC results will determine the future course of
High Energy Physics
…its detectors too
In our last report ECFA/01/213 on “the Future of Accelerator-based Particle Physics in Europe”,
ECFA has identified the main research directions.
It recommended:
 the allocation of all necessary resources to fully exploit the unique and
pioneering LHC facility
 the construction in as timely a fashion as possible of a high-luminosity e+eLinear Accelerator with an energy range exceeding 400 GeV
and for the long term:
 a coordinated collaborative R&D effort toward a neutrino factory based on
a high-intensity muon storage ring, including as a first step the construction of
a neutrino beam emanating from high-intensity proton beams
 a coordinated collaborative R&D effort toward the development of a multiTeV e+e- Linear Accelerator, a very large hadron collider and a muon collider
It also stressed the urgent need of
“an improved educational programme in the field of accelerator physics
and increased support for accelerator R&D activity in European universities,
national facilities and CERN”
The ongoing worldwide scientific programs (including the LHC)
should provide the inputs leading to major decisions
around 2010
We should have as many technological options as possible available
Launch of European wide range and large scale structured
accelerator R&D programs
 To reinforce already started activities as appropriate
 To initiate new ones
 To explore what could be the future R&D direction
Accelerator R&D projects
ESGARD Strategy:
 Develop a general multipurpose program
 From which specific projects would emerge
3 Networks
http://care.lal.in2p3.fr
First step
4 Joint Research Activities
Cavity prod., cost reduc.,
Tuner, Couplers, LLRF,
Beam diagnostics, …
Conductor Dev., Thermal
Stud., Quench Prot., Insul…
Laser systems,
Photocathodes,
e-gun, plasma accel.
NC & SC RF struct.,
Choppers, Beam dynam.
4 Joint Research Activities
Main themes of the 3 Networking Activities
Electron
Linear accel.
and coll.
HI/HE
proton
accelerators
exist. (in cons.)
Projects
TTF/
ILC
LHC, HERA
CNGS
SLHC/VLHC SuperBeam b-Beam
SRF
X
Photo Injector
X
CTF/
CLIC
X
X
X
ISIS,PSI
m-beam
X
High Intensity
proton Injector
High Field
magnets
Neutrino Beams
X
X
X
X
22 institutes from 9 countries having signed the EU contract
…and many (58) associates
X
X
Networking activities
Coll. Type
TeV
MultiTev
programs
CARE R&D
EUROTEV
CARE
R&D
TTF
ILC-GDE
CTF3
CLIC
Projects
BENE
Toward PeV
FEL
EUROLEAP
CARE
R&D
X-FEL
…
b-beams
nFact
Coll. Type
superbeams
programs
CARE R&D CARE R&D CARE R&D
EURISOL Scoping Study
Projects
Linac4, SPL
SPL
SPL, MICE
Coll. Type
SLHC
VLHC
programs
CARE R&D
CARE R&D
Projects
Linac4
SPL or RCS
Generic Design Study for ILC and CLIC
BDS: Beam Delivery System
DR: Damping Rings
PPS: Polarized Positron Source
DIAG: Diagnostics
ILPS: Integrated Luminosity Performance Studies
METSTB: Metrology and Stabilization
GANMVL: GAN Multipurpose Virtual Laboratory
23 participants from 6 countries
Connection
To
CARE
A 3-year program, with:
Coordinating lab: DESY
Admin. Coord.: E. Elsen
Scientific co-chairs of SC
G. Guignard & N. Walker
Contributing
to the
ILC-GDE
Objectives
 To build a laser-plasma accelerator
 To accelerate electrons to the GeV energy range in a
plasma wave.
 To test the issues related to the control of the properties
of the electron beam
 Expected result: accelerated e-beam with
 energy in the energy in the GeV range,
 energy spread of the order of 1%,
 pulse duration of the order of 100 fs,
 charge in the range 10 to 100 pC
11 institutes from 4 countries
EURISOL with b-beams
21 participants from 15 countries
4-year program. Coordinating lab: LNL
Scientific & Admin. Coord.: G. Fortuna
Connection
To
CARE
Leader: M. benedikt (CERN)
Neutrino beams using b-beams
~ 300 MeV n e and ne
ne with He 6
n e with Ne18
Megaton detector
A possible site could be at Frejus tunnel
… being investigated as well as other sites
Such a detector is needed for
Proton decays and n from SN…
Summary of Accelerator R&D projects
Project
Type
Beam
Type
Start
date
Duration
Years
Total
Cost
EU
contribution
CARE
I3
All
1/1/04
5
55 M€
15.2 M€
EUROTEV
DS
e+,e- (LC)
1/1/05
3
29 M€
9 M€
EURISOL
DS
Ion, p
(n b-beam)
1/1/05
4
33 M€
(3.3 M€)
9.16 M€
(1 M€)
>117 M€
33.2 M€
4.1 M€
2 M€
Total
EUROLEAP NEST
e Plasma
acceleration
???
3
These projects are well structured, with clear objectives, deliverables and
milestones. Together with the big lab activities, they represent the backbone for
the HEP European accelerator R&D effort in order to play a leadership role
 In the improvement of present accelerators
 In the development of new accelerators
Detector R&D for ILC/CLIC
22 participants
+ ~20 associated partners
Network
Coordination: DESY
Duration: 4 years
EUDET
Transnational Access
Joint research
activities
Management
Access to
DESY test beam
Test beam
infrastructures
Detector R&D
Network
Access Detector
R&D Infrastr.
Tracking
detectors
Calorimeter
Contract signature for a program start in 2006
HE/UHE cosmic accelerators
… a new source class: “Dark Accelerators”
TeV-Gamma-Ray
X-Ray
Radio
• extended
• hard spectra
• steady emission
Three sources known
Multi messenger study needed
to understand physics of sources
and cosmic accelerators
(from T. Lohse, EPS2005)
Protons (Auger…)
g-rays (Hess, Magic, Veritas, Glast…)
Neutrinos (Megaton, IceCube,
KM3net…)
Gravitational waves (LISA…)
Other HEP non-accelerator R&D projects
Project
Type
Topics
Start
date
Duration
Years
Total
Cost
EU
contribution
EUDET
I3
Detectors for
e+,e- (LC)
1/1/06
?
3
23.2 M€
7 M€
ILIAS
I3
Astroparticle
multipurpose
1/4/04
4
10 M€
7.5 M€
DS
Astroparticle
n telescope
1/1/06
?
4
24.2 M€
9 M€
>57 M€
23.5 M€
http://ilias.in
2p3.fr/
KM3net
http://www.k
m3net.org/
Total
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2011
2012
?
?
?
?
CARE
Multipurpose (e,p,n)
EUROTEV
DS: ILC+CLIC
EURISOL
DS: Neutrino b-beam
DS nFact
Scoping
study
?
?
?
?
? DS nFact ?
e in plasma?
EUROLEAP
Detector R&D
EUDET
ILIAS
Megaton
KM3NET
ILC detectors
Multipurpose Astropart
Prestudy
? cavity study ?
Undersea n telescope
Major Strategic decisions
Accelerator R&D
European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructure (ESFRI)
http://www.cordis.lu/esfri/home.html
Launch of a European Roadmap for Research Infrastructures
• Creating Europe’s first ever Roadmap of large scale research facilities/research
infrastructures.
• The ESFRI Roadmap will be instrumental in helping to identify those projects
that are crucial for the scientific community in Europe.
The first roadmap is to be published by early Autumn 2006.
CERN Council Strategy Group
http://cern.ch/council-strategygroup
The Strategy Group shall produce a Draft Strategy Document (DSD) addressing the
main lines of Particle Physics in Europe, accelerator-based and non-accelerator based,
including R&D for novel accelerator and detector technologies.
The DSD shall be submitted to the CERN Council for unanimous approval.
CERN COUNCIL
Strategy Group
Open Symposium
(January/February)
Briefing Book
March 31, 2006
Preparatory Group
DRAFT STRATEGY DOCUMENT
Zeuthen May 2-5, 2006
STRATEGY DOCUMENT
Lisbon, July 2006
ESFRI
HEP COMMUNITY and
FUNDING AGENCIES
Conclusions
Post lHC: Many possibilities, LHC will tell what is best
We are doing all efforts to keep all options open
On a more personal note
Thanks Larry for having spent with us 2 wonderful years
We have benefited a lot from your expertise and your advise
I certainly hope we will find ways to continue …
…there is and will be still a lot to do