Document 7475853

Download Report

Transcript Document 7475853

J2EE - ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AND INTEROPERABILITY WITH NON-J2EE CLIENTS

presented by

Sudha Balla, Betsy Cherian and Lance Fiondella

Semester Project

CSE333 – Distributed Component Systems (FALL 2002)

Instructor

Prof. Steven A. Demurjian

Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Connecticut

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

J2EE--1

Organization of presentation 6.

7.

8.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Introduction and Motivation(Lance) Server-side component architectures(Sudha) J2EE Platform overview(Lance) J2EE Standardized Services(Betsy) EJB/CORBA(Sudha) J2EE Patterns(Betsy) The Department of Motor Vehicles Prototype(Sudha) Conclusion(Sudha) J2EE--2

Introduction - Assessment      Java has been around for over 7 years now.

Server-side component architectures Microsoft’s .NET product Sun Microsystems’ Java2 Platform Enterprise Edition (J2EE) standard Object Management Group’s CORBA standard J2EE--3

Introduction - Benefits    Enterprise JavaBeans includes both Java/RMI and RMI – IIOP as middleware options. Sun and OMG support EJB/CORBA interoperability and have produced standards for the same. The EJB/CORBA mapping specification and RMI IIOP relieve EJB from being restricted to the Java platform, enabling EJB components to be exposed as CORBA objects making them well suited for cross language interoperability.

J2EE--4

J2EE--5

Motivation – SE to EE  Large organizations

utilize

J2EE.

J2EE--6

Motivation - … J2EE--7

Motivation – Academic perspective    Maintain an objective research perspective on the state of development of Java2 Enterprise Edition and Java technologies in general. Determine the role Java plays as an educational language, problem-solving skill for the workplace, and research tool for academia.

Focus on the classical facilities

into the true maturation of Java.

provides insight J2EE--8

     Server-side Component Architectures ( Overview ) Issues surrounding server-side development The need for standardized architecture Popular server-side architecture standards Similarities and differences between J2EE and other competing technologies Enterprise Application Development and these technologies J2EE--9

   Server-side Component Architectures ( Software Components ) What are software components?

What is a component architecture?

Divide-and-conquer approach and its advantages  Saves development and deployment time  Services could be simply outsourced   Users save time by buying instead of building Deployment is strengthened as the common products are developed by domain experts J2EE--10

     Server-side Component Architectures ( Server-side Components ) What is a server-side deployment?

Logical layers in the deployment    Presentation Layer Business logic Layer Data Layer Layers are pure abstractions and may or may not correspond to physical distribution a N-tier architecture deployment is one where there is a physical separation between each of the layers Each of the layers could further be decomposed to allow various parts of the system to scale independently J2EE--11

Server-side Component Architectures ( Three-tier Web-based Application Architecture ) WEB SERVER Presentation layer I n s e c u r e Firewall + tier boundary APPLICATION SERVER WITH COMPONENT CONTAINER Business logic Layer Database tier boundary Data layer z o n e S e c u r e J2EE--12

Server-side Component Architectures ( N-Tier Architectures )

PRO:

 Deployment costs are low    Database switching costs are low Low costs in business logic migration Securing deployments using firewalls is possible    Errors are localized

CON:

  Resource pooling is possible Performance slowdown is localized Communication performance suffers Maintenance costs are high J2EE--13

Server-side Component Architectures (Demands of a multi-tier deployment)        Handle lifecycle of the components Perform resource pooling Broker method requests Handle the logic to load-balance communications between each tier Deal with ramifications of two or more clients concurrently accessing the same component Reroute client requests to other machines in case of failure Provide secure environment and deal with unauthorized accesses APPLICATION SERVERS WERE BORN AS A SOLUTION TO THESE ISSUES J2EE--14

Server-side Component Architectures (Role of Application Servers)    provide the middleware services allow enterprises buy the services aid in rapid the application development

Anomalies and problems:

 Vendor specific middleware services  Once an application sever is chosen the code is locked to that particular vendor’s solution   Reduces portability Hampers commerce of components J2EE--15

Server-side Component Architectures (Need for a standard)      The standard would describe a well-formed interface between the application server and the components themselves Components could be managed in a portable way Components could be switched between various application servers Component vendors could be relieved of issues about external overhead such as resource pooling, networking, security etc.

Necessary elements of enterprise-class deployments are externalized to application server vendors, providing common services to all component developers J2EE--16

   Server-side Component Architectures (Standards) OMG’s CORBA Standard Sun Microsystem’s J2EE Standard Microsoft’s .NET Architecture J2EE--17

Server-side Component Architectures (Standards – J2EE vs .NET) Java Client Application Business System Web Client Container Servlets and JSPs EJBs Connectors Legacy Systems or Databases or Other Business Systems

The J2EE Server-side Architecture

J2EE--18

Server-side Component Architectures (Standards – J2EE vs .NET) Business System Rich Client Application Container ASP.NET

.Net Managed Components Host Integration Server 2000 Web Client Legacy Systems or Databases or Other Business Systems

The .NET Server-side Architecture

J2EE--19

Server-side Component Architectures (Standards – J2EE vs .NET) J2EE was found advantageous over .NET:  a proven platform while .NET is a rewrite of technologies and introduces risk as with any first-generation technology Microsoft’s previous  lets enterprises take advantage of existing hardware they may have  gives platform neutrality, including Windows and good portability  has a better legacy integration through the Java Connector Architecture (JCA)  lets the use of any operating system enterprises prefer, such as Windows, UNIX, or mainframe J2EE--20

J2EE Platform Overview - Environment J2EE--21

J2EE Platform Overview Components and Containers J2EE--22

J2EE--23

J2EE Platform Overview – Java Servlet Technology(1)    Mechanism for generating dynamic web content.

They may be thought of as Java

applets for servers

.

platform independent, pleasant user interfaces, better performance due to persistent well-defined API for flexibility. J2EE--24

     J2EE Platform Overview – Java Servlet Technology(2) Web browser  Web server  HTTP request  web server gives request to servlet container  gives request to specific servlet Servlet receives request object. Servlet processes. (may return a response object) During process, servlet may use a context object to

save information

usable by other servlets, and read a session object to

determine a client state

.

J2EE--25

J2EE Platform Overview – JavaServer Pages(1)     Utilize Java Servlet technology to simplify well organized dynamic web content.

JSP pages define

the static HTML template, and embeds invocations to Java code. Useful and routine operations like embedding dynamic distributed database queries and generation of their associated reports.

Hides the complexity of programming in Java from the page designer J2EE--26

Enterprise JavaBean Components(1)    A

server-side technology

for developing and deploying components containing the business logic of an enterprise application.

Allows encapsulation of legacy technologies. EJB is a client-neutral standard. J2EE--27

   Enterprise JavaBean Components – Entity Beans Represent

persistent

objects like database entries.

EJB specification indicates that a bean and its references survive a crash of its container. (achieved by storing the state in the database or through serialization) Container provides a class in order to provide meta-data to the client.

J2EE--28

  Enterprise JavaBean Components Message-Driven Beans A basis for constructing loosely coupled applications capable of communicating indirectly

using the queuing and subscription models supported by JMS

.

More flexible and realistic for heavily congested networks.

J2EE--29

   Enterprise JavaBean Components Session Beans Limited lifetime as the name suggests If

stateless

won’t preserve state between calls Saving and restoring state are properties of

stateful

session beans J2EE--30

J2EE Technology Suite J2EE--31

J2EE Standardized Services  The containers supporting the J2EE components provide three types of services :  Communication  RMI-IIOP    Java IDL JMS Java Mail   Enterprise  JDBC    JTA JNDI JCA Internet  HTTP  TCP/IP  SSL  XML J2EE--32

Communication Services    JavaIDL, RMI-IIOP  Allows objects written in Java to to invoke CORBA objects using IIOP. Provides interoperability with CORBA objects.

JMS  API for asynchronous messaging JavaMail:  Provides an API for electronic mail J2EE--33

Enterprise Services     JDBC  JTA API for DB independent connectivity between J2EE and other datasources  The transaction API for J2EE which guarantees transactional integrity JNDI  Provides a naming environment, & facilitates directory operations JCA  Mandatory with v.1.3 of J2EE. Helps to integrate different EJB containers with different EIS.

J2EE--34

Internet Services   For access to Internet services, J2EE supports the following protocols:  TCP/IP   HTTP SSL XML  J2EE v.1.3. supports XML functionality. J2EE--35

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY (Overview)      how EJB and CORBA complement each other where EJB gets its edge over CORBA where CORBA would be still depended on benefits of EJB / CORBA interoperability interoperability scenarios J2EE--36

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( CORBA Overview) CLIENT CORBA Object Interface CORBA Stub CORBA Object Implementation CORBA Skeleton ORB Network via IIOP

CORBA Architecture

ORB J2EE--37

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( CORBA Services)      COS Naming CORBA Event Service Object Transaction Service (OTS) Concurrency Control Service Security Service J2EE--38

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( CORBA ) Advantages:   not controlled by one organization language-independent Disadvantages:  Slow-moving  Steep learning curve J2EE--39

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( OMG’s CCM Specification )      adds component features to CORBA objects similar to EJBs intention that CORBA components and EJBs can reside together a CORBA component could appear as if it were an EJB an EJB could appear as if it were a CORBA component J2EE--40

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( Why is CORBA important for EJBs?

)    Legacy Integration Advanced middleware services EJBs exposed to CORBA clients (the highlight of this interoperability section) J2EE--41

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( RMI and IIOP)     Remote Method Invocation(RMI) is a communications package for performing distributed computing in Java default protocol layer for communication used by RMI is Java Remote Method Protocol(JRMP) CORBA uses Internet Inter-ORB Protocol(IIOP) as its default protocol layer for communications RMI and CORBA are very similar technologies J2EE--42

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( RMI and CORBA)

Problems:

 RMI - built specifically for Java and CORBA – built to allow language interoperability  two technologies are highly incompatible   major portion of a program coded for the RMI API needs to be rewritten if there is a need to switch to CORBA and vice versa prohibits code reuse

Ideal Scenarios:

 Combine client-side Java RMI with server-side CORBA  Combine client-side CORBA with server-side Java RMI

Need: bridge between RMI and CORBA Solution: RMI over IIOP

J2EE--43

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( RMI and CORBA – Ideal Scenarios) RMI CLIENT CORBA Object Implementation RMI Remote Object Interface RMI Stub CORBA Skeleton CORBA CLIENT CORBA Object Interface CORBA Stub RMI Object Implementation RMI Skeleton ORB Network via IIOP

Scenario #1

ORB ORB Network via IIOP

Scenario #2

ORB J2EE--44

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( RMI over IIOP)         unification of RMI and CORBA RMI run over IIOP (instead of JRMP) delivers CORBA distributed computing capabilities to the Java2 platform speeds distributed application development completely in Java code reusability of programs coded with the RMI API and the CORBA API lessens the impact of switching between the two technologies IIOP eases legacy application and platform integration IIOP makes RMI more robust J2EE--45

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( RMI over IIOP : Combinations) CLIENT SERVER  RMI client with RMI-IIOP Stub  RMI Server with RMI-IIOP skeleton  RMI Stub client with RMI-IIOP  CORBA object implementation  CORBA client  CORBA client  RMI Server with RMI-IIOP skeleton  CORBA object implementation J2EE--46

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( EJB Specification)   EJB components must be able to run over both RMI and RMI-IIOP RMI-IIOP as an on-the-wire protocol for EJB components

Advantages to J2EE:

 greatly assist the integration of the J2EE environment into existing corporate infrastructures, most of which are quite CORBA intensive   EJBs could be exposed as CORBA components that could be accessed by non-Java Clients relieves EJBs off the constraint that they could be only Java based J2EE--47

EJB – CORBA INTEROPERABILITY ( Scenarios) RMI-IIOP CLIENT EJB Remote Object Interface RMI – IIOP Stub EJB Object Implementation RMI-IIOP Skeleton CORBA CLIENT EJB Remote Object Interface CORBA Stub EJB Object Implementation RMI-IIOP Skeleton ORB Network via IIOP

Scenario #1

ORB ORB Network via IIOP

Scenario #2

ORB J2EE--48

Patterns - Definition     Definition 

“.. are a collection of J2EE based solutions to common problems... They extract the core issues of each problem, offering solutions that represent an applicable distillation of theory and practice”.

“ a recurring solution to a problem in a context”

Repository of patterns is called the Design Pattern Catalog Documented according to a

template

Organized in tiers J2EE--49

Patterns - Tiers    Presentation Tier  Contains the patterns related to Servlets and JSP technology.

Business Tier  Contains the patterns related to the enterprise beans technology Integration Tier  Contains the patterns related to JMS and JDBC J2EE--50

J2EE Pattern Relationships J2EE--51

Pattern Name Decorating Filter Front Controller View Helper Composite View Service to Worker Dispatcher View Presentation Tier Brief Synopsis Facilitates pre and post-processing of a request Provides a centralized controller for managing the handling of a request Encapsulates logic that is not related to presentation formatting into Helper components Creates an aggregate View from atomic sub-components Combines a Dispatcher component in coordination with the FrontController and View Helper Patterns.

Combines a Dispatcher component in coordination with the FrontController and View Helper Patterns, deferring many activities to View processing.

J2EE--52

Business Tier Business Delegate Decouples presentation and service tiers, and provides a façade and proxy interface to the services.

Value Object Session Facade Aggregate Entity Value Object Assembler Value List Handler Service Locater Exchanges data between tiers.

Hides business object complexity, centralizes workflow handling.

Represents a best practice for designing coarse-grained entity beans.

Builds composite value object from multiple data sources.

Manages query execution, results caching and result processing. Hides complexity of business service lookup and creation, locates business service factories. J2EE--53

Integration Tier Data Access Object Service Activator Abstracts data sources, provides transparent access to data.

Facilitates asynchronous processing for EJB components.

J2EE--54

Use of Patterns in DMV App  The following patterns were used in the DMV Application:  Front Controller      View Helper Session Façade Transfer Object Transfer Object Assembler Data Access Object J2EE--55

     Application Prototype (Overview) JBuilder7 Enterprise JDataStore BES 5 MS VC++ 5.0 (for non-Java Client) MVC architecture

CONTROLLER (SERVLET & HANDLER) VIEW (JSPs & HELPER) MODEL (EJBs & Domain classes)

J2EE--56

Application Prototype Use Case Diagram J2EE--57

Application Prototype Deployment Diagram J2EE--58

Application Prototype EJBs in the DMV Application J2EE--59

Application Prototype Class Diagram J2EE--60

Application Prototype Application Flow and Patterns(1)

This flow is followed by the Login, Registration and License Modules

J2EE--61

Application Prototype Application Flow and Patterns(2)

This flow is followed by the Report Module

J2EE--62

Application Prototype EJB exposed to non-Java Clients

Non-Java Client (C++ Application) TrafficViolation Application Looks up the SB as a CORBA component TrafficViolationSB (Session Bean) DMV Application Finds the License and increments its points LicenseEB (Entity Bean) Updates the database DMV Database

J2EE--63

Application Prototype EJB exposed to non-Java Clients J2EE--64

Application Prototype Screen shots(1) J2EE--65

Application Prototype Screen shots(2) J2EE--66