Cosmic Microwave Background  Cosmological Overview/Definitions  Temperature  Polarization

Download Report

Transcript Cosmic Microwave Background  Cosmological Overview/Definitions  Temperature  Polarization

Cosmic Microwave Background
 Cosmological Overview/Definitions
 Temperature
 Polarization
 Ramifications
Scott Dodelson
Academic Lecture V
Goal: Explain the Physics and
Ramifications of this Plot
Coherent picture of formation of
structure in the universe
t  10 34 sec
t ~100,000 years
Quantum
Mechanical
Fluctuations
during Inflation
Perturbation
Growth: Pressure
vs. Gravity
V ( )
m, r , b , f
Photons freestream:
Inhomogeneities
turn into
anisotropies
zreion , de , w
Matter
perturbations
grow into nonlinear structures
observed today
Review of Notation
 Scale Factor a(t)
 Conformal time/comoving horizon
dt/a(t)
 Gravitational Potential 
 Photon distribution 
 Will use Fourier transforms
x d3k keikx /(2)3
k is comoving wavenumber
 Wavelength k-1
Photon Distribution
 Distribution  depends on position x (or wavenumber
k), direction n and time t (or η).
 Moments
Monopole: 
Dipole:

Quadrupole: 
 You might think we care only about at our position
because we can’t measure it anywhere else, but …
We see photons today from last
scattering surface at z=1100
 accounts for
D* redshifting
is distanceout
to last
of
scattering
potential
surface
well
Can rewrite  as integral
over Hubble radius (aH)-1
Perturbations
outside the
horizon
Perturbations can be
decomposed into Fourier modes
+
=
Combine Fourier Modes to Produce
Structure in our Universe
+
=
+
=
In this simple example, all modes
have same wavelength/frequency
More generally, at each wavelength/frequency,
need to average over many modes to get spectrum
Inflation produces
perturbations
 Quantum mechanical fluctuations in
gravitational potential
<(k) k’>3 3k-k’Pk
 Inflation stretches wavelength beyond
horizon: k,tbecomes constant
 Infinite number of independent
perturbations w/ independent amplitudes
Evolution of Fluctuations
To see how perturbations evolve, need to solve an
infinite hierarchy of coupled differential equations
Perturbations in metric induce photon, dark matter
perturbations
Evolution upon re-entry
 Pressure of radiation acts against
clumping
 If a region gets overdense, pressure
acts to reduce the density: restoring
force
 Similar to height of guitar string
(pressure replaced by tension)
Before recombination, electrons and
photons are tightly coupled: equations
reduce to
Temperature perturbation
Very similar to …
Displacement of a string
What spectrum is produced
by a stringed instrument
C string on a ukulele
Compare the ukulele
spectrum to CMB spectrum
CMB is different because …
 Fourier Transform of spatial, not temporal,
signal
 Time scale much longer (400,000 yrs vs.
1/260 sec)
No finite length: all k allowed!
Largest Wavelength/
Smallest Frequency
Smallest Wavelength/
Largest Frequency
Why peaks and troughs?
 Vibrating String:
Characteristic
frequencies because
ends are tied down
 Temperature in the
Universe: Small scale
modes enter the
horizon earlier than
large scale modes
The spectrum at last scattering is:
Θ0 + Ψ ~ cos[k rs(η*) ]
Peaks at k = nπ/rs(η*)
One more effect: Damping on
small scales
But
So
On scales smaller than D (or
k>kD) perturbations are damped
Cl simply related to [0+]RMS(k=l/D*)
Fourier transform
of temperature at
Last Scattering
Surface
Anisotropy
spectrum
today
Remember that at any
wavelength, we are
averaging over many
modes with different
direction.
Puzzle: Why are all modes in
phase?
The perturbation corresponding to each mode
can either have zero initial velocity or zero initial
amplitude
We implicitly assumed that every mode started
with zero velocity.
Interference could destroy peak
structure
There are many,
many modes with
similar values of k.
All have different
initial amplitude.
But all are in
phase.
First Peak
An infinite number of ukuleles
are synchronized
Similarly, all
modes
corresponding
to first trough
are in phase:
they all have
zero
amplitude at
recombination
Without synchronization:
First “Peak”
First “Trough”
All modes remain constant until
they re-enter horizon.

Inflation synchronizes all modes
How do inhomogeneities at last
scattering show up as anisotropies today?
Perturbation w/ wavelength k-1 shows up as anisotropy
on angular scale ~k-1/D* ~l-1
When we
see this, we
conclude
that modes
were set in
phase
during
inflation!
NASA/WMAP
Bennett et al. 2003
Compton Scattering produces
polarized radiation field
Polarization field decomposes into 2-modes:
B-mode smoking gun signature of tensor perturbations,
dramatic proof of inflation... We will focus on E.
Three Step argument for <TE>
 E-Polarization proportional to
quadrupole
 Quadrupole proportional to dipole
 Dipole out of phase with monopole
Isotropic
radiation
field
produces no
polarization
after
Compton
scattering
Modern Cosmology
Adapted from Hu & White 1997
Radiation with
a dipole
produces no
polarization
A quadrupole
is needed
(ve 
Quadrupole proportional to
dipole
ve
ve
x
MFP )
(ve 
x
MFP )
Dipole is out of phase with monopole

  v  0  1   0
t

Roughly,
0 (k ,* )  A cos[krs (* )]
1 (k ,* )  B sin[krs (* )]
The product of monopole and dipole is initially positive (but
small, since dipole vanishes as k goes to zero); and then
switches signs several times.
DASI initially detected TE
signal
Kovac et al. 2002
WMAP has indisputable evidence that
monopole and dipole are out of phase
NASA/
WMAP
This is most remarkable for scales around l~100, which
were not in causal contact at recombination.
Different Geometries Possible
Inflation predicts a flat universe
We now have a solid argument
that the total density is flat
Object
with
known
physical
size
Parameter I: Curvature
 Same wavelength
subtends smaller
angle in an open
universe
 Peaks appear on
smaller scales in
open universe
Hot/cold spots of known physical
size has been observed
Angular size demonstrates
flatness
Parameters II
 Reionization lowers the
signal on small scales
 A tilted primordial
spectrum (n<1)
increasingly reduces
signal on small scales
 Tensors reduce the
scalar normalization,
and thus the small
scale signal
n is degenerate w/ reionization, but polarization pins
down the latter: we now know n to within a few percent.
Parameters III
 Baryons accentuate
odd/even peak
disparity
 Less matter implies
changing potentials,
greater driving force,
higher peak amplitudes
 Cosmological constant
changes the distance to
LSS
E.g.: Baryon density
x  x  F
2
Here, F is forcing term due to
gravity.
  kcs 
k
3(1  3b / 4  )
As baryon density goes up, frequency goes down. Greater
odd/even peak disparity.
Bottom line
h often used
instead of 
 m h  b h
  1 
h2
2
2
CMB data says matter
density is only 30% of
critical: Need Dark Energy
and Dark Matter
Conclusions
 Strong evidence for inflation from CMB
anisotropy/polarization spectra
 Baryon and matter densities tightly
constrained, consistent with other
determinations. Dark energy & dark matter
needed
 Connection between particle physics &
cosmology (inflation, dark matter, dark
energy) more solid than ever. We need new
tools …
Available at
www.amazon.com