Community Acquired Pneumonia Prof. Adel Khattab , MD, FCCP

Download Report

Transcript Community Acquired Pneumonia Prof. Adel Khattab , MD, FCCP

Community Acquired Pneumonia

Prof. Adel Khattab , MD, FCCP

Prof. & Head Of Pulmonary Medicine Dept. Ain Shams University Advisor of the MOH for Chest Diseases & Aviian Flu

ETIOLOGY OF CAP

Conventional diagnostic testing for CAP is imperfect e.g role of sputum isolates in diagnosing aetiology of LRTI is controversial (colonization)

No sufficiently rapid and accurate battery of diagnostic tests for CAP are available presently

Etiology remains unknown in up to 50% of cases

However, local knowledge of likely pathogen is imperative

Carroll KC. J Clin Micro 2002;40:3115-3120 Bartlett et al. NEJM 1995;333:1618-1624 Niederman et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1730-1754

Etiology of Community Acquired Pneumonia

Legionella 3% Chlamydia Mycoplasma 13% 3% H. influenzae 7% Other bacteria 7% S. pneumoniae 48% Viral 19% W S Lim,J T Macfarlane, et al. Thorax 2001;56:296-301

Aspiration Pneumonia

The bacteriology of aspiration pneumonia arising in the community setting has been confusing, and the exact role of anaerobes is uncertain.

Thus, the level of involvement of enteric Gram-negative pathogens in aspiration related illnesses is quite high and must be considered when selecting therapy.

The Disease Process

    Definition: Signs/symptoms of acute infection plus acute infiltrate or auscultatory findings Signs and symptoms: chill and/or fever, pleuritic chest pain, productive cough, tachypnea, tachycardia, rales and/or consolidation Clinical sequelae: bacteremia, metastatic foci of infection, death No association between signs/symptoms and bacterial etiology Bartlett JG, et al

. Clin Infect Dis.

2000;31:347-82. Donowitz GR, Mandell GL.

Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases

1995:619-37. Fang GD, et al

. Medicine (Baltimore).

1990;69:307-16.

IDSA / ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of CAP in Adults 2007

Advantages of Guidelines

        Synthesize large amounts of information Define the strength of existing data (evidence grading) Discuss and define relevant management issues, providing an orderly approach Help guide accurate initial empiric therapy Provide a standard against which care can be evaluated Focus on cost-effective management Identify defects in knowledge base to direct future research Tool to improve patient outcomes 29

Concerns About Guidelines

 Management without thought  Deviations may be basis for discipline  If experts cannot all agree, how can we have accurate guidelines?

 What do we do if the existing knowledge base is of poor quality?

 How strong should new data be before changing and updating guidelines?

30

Inpatient Community-Acquired Pneumonia Guideline Adherence Improves Mortality

1.00

Guideline-Concordant Antibiotics (n=323) 0.95

0.90

Nonguideline-Concordant Antibiotics (n=97) 0.85

0.80

0.75

0 10 20 Days from Presentation 30

Mortensen EM, et al.

Am J Med

. 2004;117:726-731.

Implementation of Guideline Recommendations

 Locally adapted guidelines should be implemented to improve process of care variables and relevant clinical outcomes. (Strong recommendation; level I evidence.)

Management of CAP:

Site-of-Care Decisions Hospitalization ?

ICU admission?

Assess the ability to safely and reliably take oral medication & the availability of outpatient support resources

Recommended diagnostic tests for etiology

 Pretreatment Gram stain and culture of expectorated sputum should be performed only if a good-quality specimen can be obtained and quality performance measures for collection, transport, and processing of samples can be met. (Moderate recommendation; level II evidence.)

Recommended diagnostic tests for etiology (cont.)

 Patients with severe CAP, as defined above, should at least have blood samples drawn for culture, urinary antigen tests for

Legionella pneumophila

and

Streptococcus pneumoniae

performed, and expectorated sputum samples collected for culture.  For intubated patients, an endotracheal aspirate sample should be obtained. (Moderate recommendation; level II evidence.)

Serum Markers To Predict CAP Outcomes

The two serum markers that have been most widely studied for this purpose are CRP and PCT . In general, both measures have been used to correlate with outcomes, but more data have recently been collected with PCT , and the most exciting finding has been that serial measures correlate not only with outcomes, but may also be useful for guiding the duration of therapy.

Reasons to Perform Diagnostic Testing

    Confirm the presence of community-acquired pneumonia: chest radiograph, serum markers Establish an etiologic diagnosis  Proper therapy: look for unusual or resistant pathogens  Epidemiologic purposes: eg,

Legionella

spp and environmental source, design of future empiric treatment  Focused and tailored therapy: proper duration, de-escalate, escalate Determine severity and prognosis: bacteremia, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein Define duration of therapy: procalcitonin 66

Reasons NOT to Perform Diagnostic Testing

 Expensive  Time consuming  May delay therapy  Low yield of true positives: role of prior antibiotics  False positive may add to overuse of antibiotics  False negatives may lead to undertreatment  Mixed infection (atypicals) may not be detected, yet needs therapy  No effect on outcome 67

Therapy

General & supportive

Therapy

Antibiotic

• Fluid / diet • Antipyretics • Cough syrup • O 2 therapy • TTT of complications & Coexisting illness

CAP:

When to start empiric therapy?

As soon as possible in ED

CAP: delay-to-AB> 4h after arrival

 Increased mortality  Increased LOS

IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Recommended empirical antibiotics for CAP:

Outpatient

1 Previously healthy and no risk factors for drug resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP) infection:

a)

Macrolides

(Azithromycin, clarithromycin or erythromycin)

(strong recommendation; level I evidence)

b)

Doxycycline

(weak recommendation; level III evidence)

IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Recommended empirical antibiotics for CAP:

Outpatient

2. Presence of comorbidities

such as heart, lung, or renal disease, diabetes, alcoholism, malignancies, Asplenia, immunosuppressing conditions or drugs; Antibiotic Use in last 90 days, or other risks of DRSP infection a) Respiratory fluoroquinolone (moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, or levofloxacin [750 mg]) (strong recommendation; level I evidence) b) B-lactam plus a macrolide (strong recommendation; level I evidence)

IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Recommended empirical antibiotics for CAP:

Outpatient

Presence of comorbidities a) B-lactam plus a macrolide

High-dose amoxicillin [e.g. 1 g 3 times daily] or Amoxicillin-clavulanate [2 g 2 times daily]

Alternatives

: Ceftriaxone, Cefpodoxime & Cefuroxime, Doxycycline alternative to macrolide

IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Recommended empirical antibiotics for CAP:

Inpatient, Non-ICU ttt

a) Respiratory fluoroquinolone

(strong recommendation; level I evidence)

b) b-lactam plus a macrolide Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, Ampicillin, or Ertapenem

(strong recommendation; level I evidence) Doxycycline as an alternative to the macrolide.

(weak recommendation; level III evidence)

IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Recommended empirical antibiotics for CAP:

Inpatient, ICU ttt

A) b-lactam plus either azithromycin

(level II evidence)

or a respiratory fluoroquinolone

(strong recommendation; level I evidence)

(cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or ampicillin-sulbactam) IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Recommended empirical antibiotics for CAP:

Inpatient, ICU ttt

If Pseudomonas is a consideration Antipseudomonal b-lactam

(piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, imipenem, or meropenem)

+ either ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin

(750 mg dose)

Or The above b-lactam + aminoglycoside & azithromycin Or The above b-lactam + aminoglycoside & an antipneumococcal fluoroquinolone IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Recommended empirical antibiotics for CAP:

Inpatient, ICU ttt

Community Acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA)

If CA-MRSA is a consideration

add vancomycin or linezolid

IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Switch from intravenous to oral therapy.

 Patients should be switched from intravenous to oral therapy when they are hemodynamically stable and improving clinically, are able to ingest medications, and have a normally functioning gastrointestinal tract.

(Strong recommendation; level II evidence.)

Approaches to Switching from IV to oral therapy 1. Step – down therapy:  Conversion from one antibiotic given IV to another given orally.

2. Transitional – therapy:  Conversion from same antibiotic given IV to oral but not at the same dosage or strength.

3. Sequential – therapy:  Conversion from same antibiotic IV to oral at the same dosage and strength.

CAP: Duration of Therapy

“A minimum of 5 days… Afebrile for 48-72 h (level I evidence), … No more than1 CAP associated sign of Clinical instability “

IDSA /ATS Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007; 44:S27–72

Duration of antibiotic therapy

 A longer duration of therapy may be needed if initial therapy was not active against the identified pathogen or if it was complicated by extra-pulmonary infection, such as meningitis or endocarditis. (Weak recommendation; level III evidence.)

Considerations for patients worsening or failing to improve by day three

• Predisposing condition requiring >3 days for improvement (continue present Rx) e.g. elderly patient • Incorrect diagnosis or complicating condition • Common: Pulmonary embolism or infarction, carcinoma, pulmonary edema, bronchiectasis, etc.

• Uncommon: Pulmonary eosinophilia, alveolar hemorrhage, foreign body • Unexpected pathogens: eg, mycobacteria, MRSA etc.

THANK YOU