Transcript Osteoporosis Clinical Process Framework Steven Levenson, MD, CMD 1
Osteoporosis Clinical Process Framework Steven Levenson, MD, CMD 1
Normal and Osteoporotic Bone 2
The Clinical Process Framework Project Now over a decade Started with “Green Bill” Coordinated effort between survey agency, providers, others Resulting clinical process frameworks Based on information in AMDA CPGs and other references and resources A precursor to “Advancing Excellence” process frameworks 3
Care Process Steps Assessment / Problem recognition Diagnosis / Cause identification Management / Treatment Monitoring 4
OSTEOPOROSIS Clinical Process Framework Care process step Expectations Rationale 5
ASSESSMENT / PROBLEM RECOGNITION 6
Osteoporosis: Assessment / Problem Recognition Step 1 Did staff and physician seek and document any history of osteoporosis? Expectations On admission and thereafter as indicated, staff and practitioner seek and document factors associated with, or presenting risk for, osteoporosis 7
Step 1 Rationale History may include Loss of height History of fractures (often with minimal or no trauma) Chronic back pain due to vertebral compression fractures Positive X-Ray finding of thinning of bone [osteopenia] Positive bone density study (DEXA scan) 8
Osteoporosis: Assessment / Problem Recognition Step 2 Did staff identify individuals with (or risk for) osteoporosis and its complications?
Expectations Staff and practitioner Identify individuals with loss of bone mass and complications related to decreased bone mass Identify and document risk factors for developing osteoporosis or for worsening of existing bone loss 9
Step 2 Rationale Risk factors may be Modifiable, for example Inadequate calcium and vitamin D intake Excess alcohol intake Smoking Medications that impair bone metabolism Nonmodifiable, for example Age Female gender Caucasian or Asian race Small body frame 10
Step 2 Rationale Various medications can increase risk of osteoporosis, for example Anticonvulsants, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), heparin, thyroid hormone replacement, glucocorticoids, Vitamin A 11
Osteoporosis In Men: Significant Risk Factors Age (>70 years) Low body weight (body mass index <20 to 25 kg/m2 or lower) Weight loss (>10% compared with usual young or adult weight or weight loss in recent years) Physical inactivity (no regular physical activity; e.g., walking, climbing stairs, housework, gardening 12
Osteoporosis In Men: Significant Risk Factors Use of oral corticosteroids Previous fragility fracture Reference: Qaseem A, Snow V, Shekelle P, Hopkins Are, Forciea MA, Owens DK; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Screening for osteoporosis in men: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 6;148(9):680-4 13
Step 2 Rationale May be benefits to addressing modifiable risk factors Risk factors for complications include Fall history, gait and balance disturbances, medication adverse consequences, Vitamin D deficiency 14
Definitions Osteoporosis (women) BMD that is 2.5 SD or more below the mean for women at age 30 Osteopenia BMD that is 1-2.5 SD below the average, for young, healthy white women. To date, similar criteria for osteoporosis in men 15
Standard Deviations Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation 16
Osteoporotic Fracture Risks Over Time 17
Hip Fracture Risks in Swedish Women Source: www.medicographia.com
18
DEXA Scanner 19
BMD Scoring T score Compares bone density with that of healthy young women Z score Compares bone density with that of other people of age, gender, and race 20
BMD Scanning Also called dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or bone densitometry An enhanced form of x-ray technology used to measure bone loss Current standard for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) 21
BMD Scanning DXA most often done on lower spine and hips CT scan with special software can also be used 22
FRAX Scoring 23
FRAX Computer-based screening tool that predicts the risk of developing osteoporosis Scoring system utilizing BMD results Developed by World Health Organization, WHO Can help identify individuals who should have additional testing and treatment, also depending on prognosis 24
Osteoporosis: Assessment / Problem Recognition Step 3 Did staff and practitioner identify complications of osteoporosis?
Expectations Staff and practitioner collaborate to identify complications Examples: impaired mobility, pain at fracture sites, deformities, deconditioning, neurological complications, psychological issues May include in care plan document 25
DIAGNOSIS / CAUSE IDENTIFICATION Step 4 Did practitioner and staff seek causes of osteoporosis or indicate why causes could not or should not be sought?
26
DIAGNOSIS / CAUSE IDENTIFICATION 27
DIAGNOSIS / CAUSE IDENTIFICATION Expectations Identify individuals who may benefit from additional workup Identify any additional diagnostic workup indicated to help define presence, severity, and/or causes of decreased bone mass Collaborate to document rationale for not screening or attempting to confirm suspected diagnosis of bone mass loss 28
Step 4 Rationale: Common Causes Some medications (e.g., Dilantin, steroids) Hyperthyroidism Hyperparathyroidism Chronic renal failure Malabsorption syndromes Multiple myeloma Vitamin D deficiency 29
Step 4 Rationale: Possible Testing Additional screening or diagnostic testing may not be needed if clinical evidence has already suggested or confirmed condition For example, positive X-Ray showing bone thinning, a high score on a risk assessment tool, or history of vertebral compression fractures 30
Step 4 Rationale: Possible Testing In absence of existing confirmation of diagnosis, presence of more advanced bone loss or significant complications may warrant screening or diagnostic testing In absence of contraindications (e.g., terminal condition or advanced medical illness 31
Step 4 Rationale: Possible Testing Depending on the situation, additional tests may include pDEXA scan for bone density screening Serum calcium and Vitamin D levels TSH (hyperthyroidism) Renal function tests (chronic renal failure) 32
TREATMENT / PROBLEM MANAGEMENT 33
Step 5 Did facility identify and initiate appropriate general and specific interventions?
Expectations Staff and practitioner institute relevant general and cause-specific interventions, or provide clinically pertinent reason for not doing so 34
Step 5 Rationale Some individuals may benefit from risk reduction and cause management Generic and cause-specific Generic: those applicable to all at-risk individuals 35
Generic Interventions Calcium (total 1200-1500 mg/day from all sources) Vitamin D (total 800-1000 IU/day from all sources) supplementation These may reduce additional bone loss but will not significantly improve existing bone loss 36
Generic Interventions Exercise—especially weight bearing activity—may reduce bone loss Fall prevention strategies may help reduce falls and subsequent fall-related complications of decreased bone mass 37
Vitamin D Vitamin D appears to reduce fall risk In addition to effects on bone density Serum Vitamin D levels should be at least 24 ng/ml to reduce fall risk Effect occurs after short duration of use Toxicity is possible although rare Watch for hypercalcemia May bring out hyperparathyroidism 38
Step 6 Did staff and practitioner consider possible individuals for whom additional treatment may be indicated? Expectations Practitioner and staff identify individuals who can benefit from additional treatments 39
Step 6 Rationale Several options for medications to try to reverse bone loss Bisphosphonates Calcitonin Parathyroid hormone Hormone replacement therapy or estrogen receptor modulators Osteoclast inhibitors All medications for osteoporosis treatment should be prescribed and given consistent with manufacturers’ specifications and pertinent warnings related to use Including adverse consequences and drug interactions 40
Step 6 Rationale Some individuals may not be able to tolerate side effects or comply with manufacturer’s specifications for taking these medications Do vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty help to stabilize vertebral compression fractures?
NEJM 2009; 361:557-568 - May be no more beneficial than medical pain management 41
Step 7 Did staff and practitioner address complications and related risk factors? Expectations Staff institute relevant fall prevention strategies Staff and practitioner identify and address symptoms such as pain related to osteoporosis or its complications 42
Step 7 Expectations Staff and practitioner evaluate patient’s current medication regimen and address medications that Are identified or suspected as affecting bone density May predispose to complications from osteoporosis; e.g., increase fall risk and thereby may increase risk of fracture 43
Step 7 Rationale Measures to try to prevent falls and related injury may prevent injury related complications due to osteoporosis No interventions can prevent all falls Sometimes necessary to focus on trying to minimize severity of complications, to extent possible 44
MONITORING 45
Step 8 Did practitioner and staff follow up on individuals with osteoporosis?
Expectations Practitioner and staff monitor progress of the condition and the individual’s response to any interventions Based on criteria that are relevant to the individual resident 46
Step 8 Rationale Sometimes difficult to identify specific long-term benefits of osteoporosis treatment in individuals Examples of monitoring may include— as clinically appropriate—functional capacity, degree of pain, and progression, stabilization, or reduction of bone mass loss 47
Step 9 Did staff and physician consider justification for continuing current approaches? Expectations Staff and practitioner review information that can help identify the rationale for continuing treatment 48
Step 9 Rationale Various circumstances may affect decisions about continuing or modifying treatments Prognosis Responsiveness to treatment Possibility for changing to a less obtrusive or lower-risk intervention Resident satisfaction with the benefits of— or concern about complications related to—treatment 49
Step 9 Rationale Reduced compliance with osteoporosis medications is common Mostly due to adverse consequences 50
Step 10 Did staff and practitioner monitor for, and address, complications of osteoporosis and of treatments for osteoporosis? Expectations Staff and practitioner monitor for, and manage, complications of osteoporosis and of various treatments for osteoporosis 51
Step 10 Rationale Side effects of osteoporosis medications may include Symptoms of Vitamin D or calcium excess Gastrointestinal irritation including erosive esophagitis or gastritis (bisphosphonates) Bone pain Others that are specific for the medication that is given 52
Osteoporosis 53