Transcript Introduction to Linguistics II Ling 2-121C, group b Lecture 9 Eleni Miltsakaki

Introduction to Linguistics II
Ling 2-121C, group b
Lecture 9
Eleni Miltsakaki
AUTH
Spring 2006
1
Pragmatics
• What we say is not always what we mean
• Situational context affects linguistic
meaning
• Pragmatics studies the interaction of
context with meaning
2
Conversational implicature
• Meaning implied (implicated) by virtue of
the fact that the speaker and hearer are
cooperatively contributing to the
conversation.
• Such conversations, according to Grice,
are governed by the Cooperative Principle
3
Indirect communucation
• Can you think of examples of indirect
communication? (I.e., say one thing but
mean another?)
4
• The door is over there (request, leave)
• I want 10 gallons of regular (request, give me)
• I’m sure the cat likes having its tail pulled
(imperative, stop doing that)
• You’re the boss (agree)
• I should never have done that (apologize)
• Did you bring any tennis balls? (inform that the
speaker hasn’t brought any)
5
Grice’s cooperative principle
• Make your contribution such as is required, at
the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted
purpose or direction of the talk exchange in
which you are engaged
• Conversational maxims
–
–
–
–
Maxim of quality
Maxim of quantity
Maxim of relevance
Maxim of manner
6
Maxim of quantity
• Make your contribution as informative as is
required
• Do not make your contribution more
informative than is required
7
Maxim of quality
• Try to make your contribution one that is
true:
– Do not say what you believe to be false
– Do not say that for which you lack adequate
evidence
8
Maxim of relevance
• Make your contributions relevant
(in a room with an open window)
• It’s cold here!
9
Maxim of manner
• Be perspicuous
– Avoid obscurity
– Avoid ambiguity
– Be brief
– Be orderly
10
• Conversational conventions combine with
sentence meaning and context to derive
discourse meaning
• Same as sentence grammar (words
combine to derive sentence meaning)
11
Humor
• Humor often is based on violations of
maxims
• Can you think of any?
12
• He: Your nagging goes right in one ear and
out the other.
• She: That’s because there is nothing in
between to stop it.
13
• a. Quality
• "Why did the Vice-President fly to Panama?" "Because
the fighting is over."
• b. Quantity
• "Excuse me, do you know what time it is?"
• "Yes."
• c. Relation
• "How many surrealists does it take to screw in a light
bulb?" "Fish!"
• d. Manner
• "Do you believe in clubs for young people?"
• "Only when kindness fails."
14
Speech acts
• Performative verbs
– We can use language to do things
– You warn when you say: I warn you that there
is a thief in the closet
– You give a promise when you say: I promise
I’ll love you for ever
15
Some performative sentences
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
I bet you five dollars the Yankees win
I challenge you to a match
I dare you to stop over this line
I fine you $100 for possession of oregano
I move that we adjourn
I nominate Batman for mayor of Gotham city
I promise to improve
I resign!
I pronounce you husband and wife
16
Test
• To check if you have a performative verb
trying add I hereby … before it.
• I hereby apologize to you –act of
apologizing
• # I hereby know you
17
• Every utterance is a speech act, even
when there is no performative verb
• It is raining – I state that it’s raining
• Is it raining? – I ask if it’s raining
• Leave!
-- I order you to leave
18
The role of context
• Band practice, my house, 6-8
– Could be a reminder
– Could be a warning
• The underlying purpose of an utterance is
called illocutionary force
19
Illocutionary acts
• Performed by performative sentences
• Central to linguistic communication
• One performs them successfully simply by
getting one’s illocutionary intentions
recognized
20
Perlocutionary acts
• Inspiring, impressing, embarrassing,
intimidating, persuading, misleading,
irritating
21
Perlocutionary acts
• Not performed by uttering an explicit
performative sentence
• Involve effects of the utterance and illocutionary
acts on feelings, thoughts, actions of the hearer
• S tells + H believes … =S persuades H that…
22
Speech acts recap
• Utterance acts (shouting, whispering,
murmuring)
• Illocutionary acts (promising,
reporting,asking)
• Perlocutionary acts (intimidating,
persuading, deceiving)
• Propositional acts (referring, predicating)
23
Presupposition
• Speakers make implicit assumptions about
the world
• Presuppositions of an utterance are facts
whose truth is required for the utterance to
be appropriate
24
Find the presuppositions
• Have you stopped hugging your
sheepdog?
• Who bought the badminton set?
• John doesn’t write poems anymore.
• The present King of France is bald.
• Would you like another beer?
25
• When presuppositions are inconsistent
with the actual state in the world, the
utterance is felt to be strange
26
Failing presuppositions!
•
From Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
1. “Take some more tea,” the March Hare said to
Alice, very earnestly.
2. “I’ve had nothing yet,” Alice replied in an
offended tone, “so I can’t take more.”
3. “You mean you can’t take less,” said the Hatter:
“It’s very easy to take more than nothing.”
27
Accommodation
• Presuppositions can be used to communicate
information indirectly
• My brother is rich
– The hearer accommodates the presupposition that I
have brother
• Much of the information communicated in
discourse is of this type
28
• Presuppositions are indispensable
• Compare:
– John doesn’t write any more
– A person we both know and agree that his
name is John, and who knows how to write,
and who is able to write poetry, wrote poetry in
some past time, and know he does not write
poetry
29
Legal language
• The use of language in a courtroom is
restricted so that presuppositions cannot
influence the court or jury.
• “Have you stopped beating your wife?”
– Is not a permissible question in court
30
Pragmatic inference
• Sometimes some sentences invite an
inference on the part of the hearer which
doesn’t follow from semantics
– 1a If you mow the lawn, I will give you five
dollars
– 1b If you don’t mow the lawn, I will not give
you five dollars
31
Deixis
• Some words can only be interpreted in context
• These words are called deictic (or indexical
expressions):
– My mine you your yours we ours us (personal deixis)
– This that these those (demonstratives)
– Now, this/that X, X time ago, tomorrow, last X, next X
(time deixis)
– Here, there, this/that X, (place deixis)
– Before/behind, left/right front/back (directional deixis)
32
Types of deixis
• You, you, but not you, are dismissed
(gestural deixis)
• What did you say? (symbolic)
• You can never tell what sex they are
nowadays (non-deictic)
33
Discourse deixis
• …
• That was the funniest story I’ve ever heard
34
• Deixis is common in language and marks
one boundary between semantics and
pragmatics
• I, behind me, an hour from now: have
meaning to the extent that they have
reference, to determine their reference you
need context
35
• The facts of deixis should act as a constant
reminder to theoretical linguists of the simple but
immensely important fact that natural languages
are primarily designed, so to speak, for use in
face-to-face interaction, and thus there are limits
to the extent to which they can be analysed
without taking this into account (Lyons, 1977)
36
Summary points in pragmatics
• The cooperative principle
– Four maxims of conversation
•
•
•
•
Speech acts
Presuppositions
Deixis
Pronouns and other pro-forms
37