Development of micro-tools for surgical applications LABORATOIRE DE ROBOTIQUE DE PARIS
Download ReportTranscript Development of micro-tools for surgical applications LABORATOIRE DE ROBOTIQUE DE PARIS
UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI GENOVA UNIVERSITE' PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE FACOLTA' DI INGEGNERIA LABORATOIRE DE ROBOTIQUE DE PARIS PHD THESIS EN COTUTELLE XVII CICLE Development of micro-tools for surgical applications 18 November 2005 SUPERVISORS: PROF. ING. Rinaldo MICHELINI PROF. ING. Philippe BIDAUD STUDENT: Francesco CEPOLINA University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Index robotic surgery MEMS technologies modules design system integration University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Robotic surgery Robotic in-body equipment Active catheters Endoscopes Autonomous worms Navigating pills Remote-surgery environments Orthopaedic surgery Eye surgery Laparo/thorax-tomic surgery Surgical end-effectors University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Active catheters Tohoku University www.olympus.com University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Esashi catheter Olympus catheters Endoscopes 1 of 4 Hirose + Yoneda Robotics lab State of art Ikuta laboratory University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Endoscope tip Hirose and Ikuta endoscopes Endoscopes 2 of 4 ARTS lab University of Genoa Paris PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR LRP intestinal endoscope Pisa arthroscope 6 Endoscopes 3 of 4 Dr. Gründler Swiss endoscope Pennsylvania State University Stanford Research University of Genoa Institute PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR EPAM endoscopes Endoscopes 4 of 4 Imperial College of London Neuro-endoscopic operating instruments Grenoble University University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Laparotomic endoscope Autonomous worms 1 of 3 Katholieke Uneversiteit Leuven University of Genoa Leuven intestinal worm PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR ARTS lab Pisa intestinal worm Autonomous worms 2 of 3 Katholieke Uneversiteit Leuven Leuven intestinal worm arms Korea worm University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Korea Institute of Science and Technology Autonomous worms 3 of 3 Korea Institute of Science and Technology Korea impulsive worm Korea centipede worm University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Navigating pills www.rfnorika.com University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR The Norika 3 pill Robotic surgery Robotic in-body equipment Active catheters Endoscopes Autonomous worms Navigating pills Remote-surgery environments Orthopaedic surgery Eye surgery Laparo/thorax-tomic surgery Surgical end-effectors University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Robotic surgical systems University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Orthopaedic surgery Israel Institute of Technology Eye surgery NASA Jet Propulsion Lab University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Laparo/thorax-tomic surgery http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/ University of Genoa ® PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR The da Vinci surgery system Surgical end-effectors 1 of 4 http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/ The ZEUS® surgery tools University of Genoa ® PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR da Vinci surgery tools Surgical end-effectors 2 of 4 da Vinci® snake wrist http://www.intuitivesurgical.com Technical University of Lódz University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Poland surgery gripper Surgical end-effectors 3 of 4 Michigan State University College of Engineering Michigan surgery gripper German Aerospace Center, DLR University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR German surgery gripper Surgical end-effectors 4 of 4 Warsaw University of Technology Poland sewing effector Daimler Benz University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR German forceps Minimally invasive surgery: clamps 2DoF 4DoF 4DoF 5DoF 5DoF 5DoF F. Cepolina, R.C. Michelini, “"Robots in medicine: A survey of in-body nursing aids. Introductory overview and concept design hints." University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Index robotic surgery MEMS technologies modules design system integration University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR MEMS technologies 1/4 PIEZOELECTRIC EFFECT ELECTROSTATIC FORCE Multilayer piezoelectric actuators Comb drive Ultrasonic motor Rotating comb drive Inchworm piezoeletric motor Wooble motor University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR MEMS technologies 2/4 MAGNETO AND ELECTROSTRICTIVE FORCE SHAPE MEMORY ALLOYS Actuators SMA Electrostrictive actuators Elastomeric dielectric actuators Magnetostrictive actuators ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD 1/2 Coreless DC motors MAGNETO- AND ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL EFFECT University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR MEMS technologies 3/4 ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD 2/2 Micro stepper motor Brushless DC motor Micro linear motor Solenoids Stepper motor Voice coil motor University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR MEMS technologies 4/4 FLUID ACTUATION Bourdon pipe Artificial muscles THERMAL EXPANSION University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Index state of art MEMS technologies modules design system integration University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Modules design embodiment design commercial components detail design Target 1 control Improvement of arm dexterity University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Design process University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Technical problems Limited module size: 10 mm max (fixed by the trocar) L 30 mm max (fixed by thorax) Limited actuators power block not active joints, use light material Size limited n° of modules, limited payload Machining Limited space available use miniature screws, gluing, welding How to link modules together: mechanic, power, signal Operating theatre High precision and accuracy is required arm stiffness, error compensation Safety force feedback, fast module retrieval, module reliability, modules compliance Control Redundant robot control distributed logic, singularities avoidance, coordination with 2nd hand, sensor fusion, communication protocol University of Genoa Actuation ? Material ? Transmission ? Sensors ? PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Surgical articulated arm Vladimir Filaretov Instrument design University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR In collaboration with: Prof. Vladimir Filaretov of Far Eastern State Technical University (Vladivostok) Arm with clutches TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Clutches are delicate • Precision machining is needed University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Self powered forearm TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Motors limit the arms power • Low dexterity University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Universal joint forearm TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Precision machining is needed University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Flexible joints forearm TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Disposition of the wires along the arm University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR The forearms family University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Modules design embodiment design commercial components detail design control University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Torque needed for sewing Smoovy motor I model DC2S3.125.R.3 size D 3.4=mm, L=13,29 mm+1,7 mm motor speed 15000 rpm gear ratio 125 gear speed 120 rpm gear torque 2,6 2,2to3,0 mNm Smoovy motor II model DC2S4.025.R.3 size D 4.8=mm, L=16,3 mm+4,66 mm 250 rps 2 rps motor speed 32500 rpm 541,666667 rps gear ratio 25 gear speed 1300 rpm 21,6666667 rps gear torque 0,9 0,6to1,2 mNm Faulhaber motor model 0206 B size D 1,9=mm, L=10,03 mm+1,55 mm motor speed 35000 rpm gear ratio 47 gear speed 744,6808511 rpm gear torque 0,225 0,15to0,3 mNm Actuation 583,333333 rps Material 12,4113475 rps Transmission Sensors Our torque needs Sewing force arm Sewing torque 0,3 N 4 mm 1,2 mNm D13, A125° D1 0 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 4 Motor selection 1/2 Commercial miniature electric motors COMMENTS Penn States sells miniature (1.8 mm diam, 4 mm long) piezoelectric motors too expensive (3300 Euro/each) Actuation Material Transmission Sensors University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Motor selection 2/2 alluminium 2,71 g/cm3 acetal 1,30 g/cm3 module b0 motor torque 0,357 1,072 1,787 3,217 b1 dynamic weight 0,523 mNm b2 dynamic weight 1,568 mNm b3 dynamic weight 2,614 mNm 4,705 ANSWER aluminium module b can carry about 1 module b acetal module b can carry about 2 modules b b0 b1 4,805 mNm e1 dynamic weight e2 dynamic weight e3 dynamic weight 1,087 mNm 3,261 mNm 5,434 mNm 9,782 e1 e2 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 0,896 mNm b1 dynamic weight b2 dynamic weight b3 dynamic weight 0,203 mNm 0,61 mNm 1,017 mNm 1,83 ANSWER aluminium module b can carry about 1 module b acetal module b can carry about 2 modules b b0 ANSWER aluminium module e can carry about 2 modules e acetal module e can carry about 2 modules e e0 0,124 0,372 0,62 1,116 b2 module e0 motor torque 0,831 2,494 4,157 7,482 module b0 motor torque 1,493 mNm b1 b2 module e0 motor torque 0,373 1,119 1,865 3,356 2,883 mNm e1 dynamic weight e2 dynamic weight e3 dynamic weight 0,522 mNm 1,565 mNm 2,609 mNm 4,695 Actuation Material ANSWER aluminium module e can carry about 2 modules e acetal module e can carry about 2 modules e e0 e1 e2 Transmission Sensors COMMENT Penn States piezo electric motors (1.8 mm diam, 4 mm long) are too expensive (3300 Euro/each) Material selection MATERIALS COMPARISON (FROM FARNELL) It is performed a comparison between the engineering materials available from Franell units ABS Acetal copolymer (Ertacetal C) Acetal homopolymer (Derlin) Nylon (EETALON 66 SAMU) Nylon (EETALON 66 SA) Nylon (EETALON 66 GF-30) PEEK PTFE PVC Polycarbonate (AXXIS) Polyethylene (PET-P) Polyethylene (UHMWPE) Polypropylene Torlon 4203 PAI density tens mod tens strength flex mod flex strength compr stength melt point Hardness elong yield g/cc MPa MPa MPa MPa MPa Degrees Rockwell % 1,05 2495 41 2400 77,4 64 58 R103 2,6 1,41 2795 62 2585 90 61 165 R120 60 1,42 3105 70 2620 98 73 175 R120 30 1,16 3645 82,5 3103 120 17 260 R118 75 1,145 2238,5 72,5 1927 91,5 17 260 R116 190 1,35 10000 190 ? 270 17 255 M100 3 1,4 5700 110 4100 160 120 180 R130 5 2,25 489 18 600 98 12,5 327 S82 300 1,46 3500 48 2534 125 ? 80 D84 120 1,2 2300 65 2967 100 52 154 M75 50 1,15 3200 85 3400 120 103 260 R130 20 0,93 606 40 517 ? ? 130 D62 350 0,9 1050 42 2000 45 ? 160 D80 600 1,38 4500 120 ? ? 40 357 8 mm F Admissible bending Load (N) ELONGATION mm < 0,01 Transmission Sensors 10 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0,8 F Material Admissible bending load 150 mm Nylon LOAD N 10 ? Actuation University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 0,9 1 1,1 1,2 Density (g/cc) Any material can support about 300g as bending load 1,3 1,4 1,5 Components selection Motors 3300 € 550 € 90° transmission 5€ 8€ Angular sensors 4€ University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 18 € Actuation Material Transmission Sensors Modules design embodiment design commercial components detail design control University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Index Detail design 1 DOF modules 2 DOF modules End effectors Final solution University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 1DOF modules 1/5 TECHNICAL PROBLEM • The face gear is not feasible • Link between the orange gear and the pink part • Low torque OVERALL L GEAR RATIO 17.5mm (motor l 1.5mm) 0.625 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 1DOF modules 2/5 TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Multipole magnet offers low resolution • Multipole magnet is costly • The magnet is difficult to assemble • Low torque University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 1DOF modules 3/5 TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Consider undercutting for gear design • The gear, if magnetic, is difficult to machine • Low torque University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 1DOF modules 4/5 TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Optic wires along the arm • This face gear is not machinable • Low torque University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 1DOF modules 5/5 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 1DOF modules family: PROBLEM • Low torque PROBLEM • Low torque • Too long • Big gear • Face gear not machin. PROBLEM • Low torque PROBLEM • Low torque PROBLEM • Low torque • Face gear not • The magnetic • The gear is not machin. gear is not machin. machin. • Cabling problems • Sensor gives low resolution University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 1DOF modules: rotational 1/3 PROBLEM • Difficult assembly University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR • Crown gear is not machinable • Face gear is not machinable • Low torque 1DOF modules: rotational 2/3 PROBLEM • The magnetic gear is difficult to make University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR • The sensor is costly • Low torque 1DOF modules: rotational 3/3 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 1DOF modules family: PROBLEM • Difficult assembly PROBLEM • The magnetic gear is difficult to make • Crown gear is not • Complex assembly • The sensor is costly • Low torque machinable (too small) University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR PROBLEM • The magnetic gear is difficult to make • The sensor is costly • Low torque Index Detail design 1 DOF modules 2 DOF modules End effector Final solution University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 2DOF modules 1/4 module: length 25.6mm dexterity 124° 360° gear teeth: module 0.25mm gear ratio 8/24 (/24) University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR PROBLEM • The face gears not available • Conic gears not usable • Where to put sensors ? 2DOF modules 2/4 part name adim 1,5*part A frame 2*part B frame 2*part A motor fix 4X bearing 12X screw 4 gears 2* sensor + card 2*magnet motor + reduction mass g 1,469907 0,4449396 0,4009896 0,195936 0,263952 0,489456 0,376602 0,15288 2,26 6,0546622 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 2DOF modules 3/4 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 2DOF modules 4/4 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 2DOF modules: PROBLEM • Too long PROBLEM • The face gears are difficult to find and to make. • Conic gears give a solution mechanically not working University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Index Detail design 1 DOF modules 2 DOF modules End effector Final solution University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Clamp 1/2 PROBLEM • Too Long HP L0(6 mm), L1(6,95 mm), b, F1 ACTUATION Smoovy 5mm + Harmonic drive 1:500 OVERALL LENGTH 31,4 + 5,6 mm POWER 58 N (optimistic) F3=F1cosb L3=L5*F3/F1 (L3/F3=L5/F1) L5=L6+L1 L1=6,95 mm L6=L0*tgb (tgb=L6/L0) b b L4 L2 L0 F1 L3 b M=L3*F3 L6 L1 L5 M=L3*F3=(L5*F3/F1)*(F1cosb)=L5*F3*cosb=L5*F1*(cosb)^2= L5=L6+L1=LO*tgb+L1 M=(LO*tgb+L1)*F1*(cosb)^2 University of Genoa L3=M/F3=M/(F1*cosb) PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR b F3 Clamp 2/2 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Clamps family: PROBLEM • too much SMA elongation is needed PROBLEM • assembly PROBLEM • assembly PROBLEM • we need a long module PROBLEM • too long University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR PROBLEM • not much place for the wires PROBLEM • force and elongation not along the axis End effectors family PROBLEM • Integrate into the system position and force sensors PROBLEM • Fix the instrument respect to the organ • Control the blade advance • See exactly were the instrument is cutting • Assembly is complex • Rotation of the syringe needle PROBLEM • High clamping force is required • Friction between clamps and needle is low • Final module needs to be short PROBLEM • Throw out the sewing wire from the spiral • To tension the sewing wire • To knot the sewing wire University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Sewing instrument TECHNICAL PROBLEM • Wire tensioning during sewing • Creation of knot University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Index Detail design 1 DOF modules 2 DOF modules End effector Final solution University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Modules selection University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Final solution 1/4 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Final solution 2/4 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Final solution 3/4 University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Final solution 4/4 A University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR B Index state of art MEMS technologies modules design system integration University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR System integration architecture selection workspace simulation evaluation University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Target 2 Selection of a robotic platform able to carry the arm Arm carrier 1: industrial robot Reduce the size of the surgery platform PROBLEM • production cost and weight Patient • the device is cumbersome University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Arm carrier 2: miniature robot Zemiti Nabil Minimise motors outside the patient PhD project Patient PROBLEM • the device can exert limited force • the instrument is delicate University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Arm carrier 3: snail Preferred solution The tendence is to ‘push’ as many DoFs as possible inside the robot Patient University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR PROBLEM • the device can exert limited force • the instrument is delicate Snail architecture Device syntesis Module length Insertion problem Optimal N of DOFs Multiple solutions University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Snail 3D view University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR System integration architecture selection kinematics simulation evaluation University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Target 3 Analysis of the robot workspace and singularities Workspace, singularities and control Forward kinematics Singularity analysis Denavit Hartenberg Graphic method: --- screw theory Robot workspace --- --Maple parametric algorithm Analytic method: Plücker coordinates Velocity transform matrix Backward kinematics Reduction to polynomial method --Pieper’s method --Numerical method --Maple parametric module Database graphical output University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Robot dynamics Creation of C++ simulation environment (on ODE language) --motion strategy Forward kinematics ROBOT ARCHITECTURE GEOMETRY PARAMETERS: L1, L2, L3, L4 JOINT COORDINATES: 1, 2, … 6 JOINT RANGES: 1min<1<1max ….. DENAVIT HARTEMBERG PLUCKER COORDINATES TRANSFORMATION MATRIX VELOCITY TRANSFORM MATRIX - END EFFECTOR POSITION: X, Y, Z - END EFFECTOR ORIENTATION: R - SINGULARITY CHECK: DET(Tc) University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Denavit Hartemberg formulation 6 DOF arm Redundant arm University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Instrument workspace: Denavit Hartenberg GEOMETRICAL DATA OF THE ARM JOINT COORDINATES RANGES WORKSPACE ANALYSIS 3D VISUALIZATION ARM CONFIGURATION DIRECT KINEMATIC MODEL OF THE ARM ARCHITECTURE DH POSES OF THE END EFFECTOR MAPLE University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR GRAPHICAL OUTPUT POINT CLOUD Instrument singularities: screw theory The mini-arm is a decoupled manipulator. The configuration is singular if one of the following conditions is satisfied: University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Instrument singularities: velocity transform matrix Velocity transform matrix Tc Determinant of Tc Solutions GEOMETRICAL DATA OF THE ARM SINGULARITY ANALYSIS 3D VISUALIZATION JOINT COORDINATES RANGES JOINTS VELOCITY TRANSFORM MATRIX OF THE ARM ARCHITECTURE SINGULAR POSES OF THE END EFFECTOR SCREW THEORY ARM WORKING CRITERIA MAPLE University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR GRAPHICAL OUTPUT POINT CLOUD Instrument singularities: iso-orientation surfaces University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Instrument singularities: overall view University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Instrument singularities: database query 1) Database creation by numerical analysis 2) Singularities workspace database query University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR System integration architecture selection workspace simulation evaluation University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Target 4 Control of the redundant surgical robot Distributed control strategy TASK REQUIREMENT END EFFECTOR POSITION AND FORCE MODEL BASED CONTROL INVERSE KINEMATICS SINGULARITIES AVOIDANCE NON LINEARITIES COMPENSATION PID CONTROL PID CONTROL MODULE 1 MODULE 2 END EFFECTOR POSITION AND FORCE END EFFECTOR POSITION AND FORCE PID CONTROL ……….. MODULE 6 END EFFECTOR POSITION AND FORCE BODY ENVIRONMENT MISSION PERFORMING University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Control of the snail surgery platform The control of the surgery robot is implemented (450 lines of code) using the ODE library University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Path planning strategy University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Sensor fusion University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Arms cooperation From 3 to 4 endoscopic arms are necessary to complete a minimally invasive surgery operation University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR System integration architecture selection workspace simulation evaluation University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Target 5 Evaluation of the prototype performance Proposed arm modules University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Selection of modules prototypes University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Prototypes: single module Damien Sallè Genetic arm optimisation Prototype design, assembly University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Actuation detail University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Torque measurement 79 g University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR 2 DOF module Damien Sallè Genetic arm optimisation Prototype design, assembly University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Gripper I actuation University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Gripper I performance Clamping force 40 N Damien Sallè Genetic arm optimisation Prototype design, assembly University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Gripper II overall view Filippo Morra Gripper design University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Gripper II actuation Jaw and spring Filippo Morra Gripper design University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Vision Sergio Daprati Gripper design University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Arm prototype Damien Sallè University of Genoa Genetic arm optimisation PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design design, assembly Prototype www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Snail joint detail University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Surgery arm prototype performance LRP Lab, Univ. of Paris 6 PMAR Lab, Univ. of Genoa University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR System integration Silvia Frumento back-arm design University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR Conclusion • A concept for an agile modular surgical robot is presented and studied • Several possible modules have been designed, some prototyped and tested with satisfactory results • A strategy for effective operation of the robot is outlined and tested in simulation University of Genoa PMAR – Department of Mechanics and Machines design www.dimec.unige.it/PMAR