Advances of Women in Sports Sara Anne Smith
Download
Report
Transcript Advances of Women in Sports Sara Anne Smith
Advances of Women in Sports
Sara Anne Smith
Overview
Brief History of Women in Sports
Psychological aspects
Title IX
Personal Experience
Questions
History of Women in Sports
776 B.C. – first Olympics: no women
allowed
1896- first modern Olympics in Athens
women not allowed, but compete anyway
1900- women in Olympics: tennis, golf, &
croquet
1967- Katherine Switzer registers for
Boston Marathon
1960/1972 – the IOC recognizes more
women’s sports including rowing
1970 – Billie Jean King made great strides
for women in tennis
“I am Strong. I am invincible. I am Women.”
-Helen Reddy
1972 – Title IX of the Education Amendments
1973 – 1.3 million girls participating in high
school sports vs. 294,000 in 1970
1996 – 2.4 million girls play high school
sports
1999 – Happy 27th Birthday Title IX
2000 – 16 new women’s events in the
Sydney Olympics & Equality
Present – more athletic women in media/
seen as role models
Myths/Reality
-Coakley
Damage to reproductive
organs
More fragile bone structure
Less attractive than other
girls
Less time to focus on
academics
No damage to reproductive
organs
Exercise is crucial to
prevention of osteoporosis
and prevention of breast
cancer
Stronger self-images and
lower levels of depression
Less likely to have unwanted
pregnancy
More likely to graduate from
high school and get better
grades
Psychology of Women in Sports
Gender role orientation
– Role Conflict – inner conflict about taking on
a “male” role
– Psychological androgyny – mixture of the
best of both gender roles and expectations
Homosexuality
– No relationship to sport and does not affect
athletic performance
Eating Disorders
– Overall may provide protection
– Prevalence is sport specific
Fear of Success
– explains female fear of succeeding (Horner)
A Hero For Daisy
Chris Ernst – 2 time Olympian rower
Yale Crew – unequal facilities
1976 – Title IX wasn’t being fully enforced
Title IX
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of
1972:
– “No person in the U.S. shall, on the basis of sex be
excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, or
be subjected to discrimination under any educational
program or activity receiving federal aid.”
Flatter me, and I may not believe you
Criticize me, and I may not like you
Ignore me, and I may not forgive you
Encourage me, and I may not forget you
-William Arthur Ward
Why was it needed?
“Athletic competition builds character in our boys.
We do not need that kind of character in our girls.”
-Connecticut judge, 1971
Today more than 150,000 women
participate in intercollegiate
athletics – fourfold increase since
1971
Women won a record 19 Olympic
medals in the 1996 Summer
Olympic Games
1994 – Increase in doctoral
degrees, law degrees, and medical
degrees earned by women,
compared to 1972
Compliance
1979 final Title IX regulations were
published
Three-part test
1.
2.
3.
Substantially proportionate
History and continuing practice
Accommodation of interest and abilities
Civil Rights Restoration Act
Conflicting Views
1990’s college sports became a big business
Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools
(1992)
– Right for plaintiffs to sue for punitive damages in
Title IX cases
Norma Cantu (1996)
– Resulted in substantial proportionality becoming a
“safe harbor”
The Three-Part Test
Colleges using the first
prong of the test in order
to avoid being sued
– Resulting in unfair cuts for
men’s teams
Kelley v. Board of Trustees
of the University of Illinois
Seven Federal Appellate
Courts have upheld the
three-part test
Discrimination Against Men?
Should not limit men’s
athletic opportunities as a
way of achieving parity for
women
Replace the three-part test
with something more flexible
Who is the real culprit?
No Change Needed
Since the enactment of Title IX, for every
dollar spent on women, two dollars were
spent on men (Fulks, 1994)
In the 1970’s sports participation for women
increased from 8% to 30% at the
intercollegiate level
– There are approximately 2.7 million girls
participating in high school sports; and a little over
150,000 currently participating in collegiate level
(NCAA)
Institutions are responsible for cutting men’s
programs
Recent Events
Bush administration calls for a Commission
on Opportunity in Athletics to review Title IX
this past June
15 member commission returns a 70-page
report in February to the Education Secretary
Law should be retooled to ensure that new
sports opportunities for women don’t come at
the expense of men’s teams
– Two major dissenters are Foudy and
de Varona
Possible Solutions
Count slots rather than actual students; walk-ons
should not be counted under proportionality
Greater flexibility in rules concerning nonscholarship athletes, older athletes and roster slots
Additional ways to demonstrate equity
A greater ability for schools to accept private money
Further Suggestions
Educational campaign
Not counting football
Cutting back on football and men’s
basketball
Stay away from the business-model and
start treating college sports like more of an
educational program
“Without Title IX, I’d be nowhere.”
-Cheryl Miller, Olympic athlete
Profound changes have occurred in education and
athletics
Increasing participation in athletics
Increase in athletic scholarships
We still have a long way to go!
Why Crew?
UCF CREW - NO EXPERIENCE NEEDED!!!
1997 – Novice – D Boat
“Rowing is a sport for dreamers. As long as you put in the work,
you can own the dream.” - Jim Dietz
Awesome learning experience
2001 – Captain -Varsity Eight
What Sports Have Done For Me
Teamwork
Dedication – never quit
Time management
Work ethic – the body can achieve what the mind believes
Attitude - I can do anything I put my mind to
“DREAM A LITTLE
SWEAT A LOT”
-CHRIS ERNST