Implementing Tier Two in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network.
Download
Report
Transcript Implementing Tier Two in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network.
Implementing Tier
Two in High Schools
Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network
This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved.
SCHOOL-WIDE
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
~5%
~15%
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students with
High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students with
At-Risk Behavior
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
~80% of Students
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports:
A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model
Tier 1/Universal
School-Wide Assessment
School-Wide Prevention Systems
Tier 2/
Secondary
ODRs,
Attendance,
Tardies, Grades,
DIBELS, etc.
Check-in/
Check-out (CICO)
Social/Academic
Instructional Groups (SAIG)
Daily Progress
Report (DPR)
(Behavior and
Academic Goals)
Competing Behavior
Pathway, Functional
Assessment Interview,
Scatter Plots, etc.
Group Intervention with
Individualized Feature
(e.g., Check and Connect -CnC
and Mentoring)
Tier 3/
Tertiary
Brief Functional Behavior Assessment/
Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP)
Complex or Multiple-domain FBA/BIP
Illinois PBIS Network, Revised October 2009
Adapted from T. Scott, 2004
SIMEO Tools:
HSC-T, RD-T, EI-T
Wraparound
3-Tiered System of Support
Necessary Conversations (Teams)
Universal
Team
Plans SW &
Class-wide
supports
Universal
Support
Secondary
Systems Team
Problem Solving
Team
Tertiary
Systems Team
Uses Process data;
determines overall
intervention
effectiveness
Standing team; uses
FBA/BIP process for
one youth at a time
Uses Process data;
determines overall
intervention
effectiveness
CICO
Brief
SAIG
Group w.
individual
feature
Brief
FBA/BIP
Sept. 1, 2009
FBA/
BIP
Complex
FBA/BIP
WRAP
10 Critical Features for Tier 2
Interventions
1.
Linked directly to school-wide expectations and/or
academic goals
2.
*Continuously available for student participation
3.
*Implemented within 3 school days of determination that the
student should receive the intervention
4.
*Can be modified based on assessment and/or outcome
data
5.
Includes structured prompts for ‘what to do’ in relevant
situations
Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool version 2.0
Anderson, Lewis-Palmer, Todd, Horner, Sugai, & Sampson
10 Critical Features (Cont’d.)
6. Results in student receiving positive feedback from staff
7. Includes a school-home communication exchange system at
least weekly
8. Orientation materials provide information for a student to get
started on the intervention
9. *Orientation materials provide information for staff/ subs./
volunteers who have students using the intervention
10. Opportunities to practice new skills are provided daily
Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool version 2.0
Anderson, Lewis-Palmer, Todd, Horner, Sugai, & Sampson
10 Critical Features: Considerations
*Continuously available for student participation
Each student’s participation should be time-limited. Ex.
After 6 weeks, either exit from intervention or progress
to higher level intervention.
*Implemented within 3 school days of determination
that the student should receive the intervention
Youth can enter intervention at point of identification. No
waiting for the ‘beginning’ of a group. Each session is a
stand-alone behavioral lesson.
*Can be modified based on assessment/outcome data
Limit modifying actual intervention for individual
students unless youth is at ‘individualized’ level of
support
*All staff are informed of the details of the
interventions
Considerations
Universal is the first sign
The language of high schools
Culture of staff
Change the language around buy-in
Lines of communication
Define At-Risk
The moving roadblock
Ask more questions
Universal
How do you know you are having the right
conversation around tier 2 implementation?
The Language of High Schools
U-tube video clip re: language
Staff Culture
The role it plays in Tier 2 implementation
How will you know if staff culture is impacting
implementation?
What questions will you ask?
Change the
language around
Staff Buy-In
Lines of communication
How do we communicate a plan?
Are we telling or are we teaching?
How is our team functioning?
Administration
At-Risk
Determine what at-risk means in your building
Who is the intervention designed to help?
Do we have the “right” students?
The moving road-block
What to consider when the roadblock keeps
moving.
What to do to help remove it.
Ask more questions
Ask more questions before problem solving
Get specific
Take breaks
Stay at the table
Questions
[email protected]