Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Conceptual Basis Eight direction pour point model (D8) Flow accumulation Pit removal and DEM reconditioning Stream delineation Catchment.
Download ReportTranscript Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Conceptual Basis Eight direction pour point model (D8) Flow accumulation Pit removal and DEM reconditioning Stream delineation Catchment.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Conceptual Basis Eight direction pour point model (D8) Flow accumulation Pit removal and DEM reconditioning Stream delineation Catchment and watershed delineation Geomorphology, topographic texture and drainage density Generalized and objective stream network delineation Reading – Arc Hydro Chapter 4 Conceptual Basis Based on an information model for the topographic representation of downslope flow derived from a DEM Enriches the information content of digital elevation data. Sink removal Flow field derivation Calculating of flow based derivative surfaces Duality between Terrain and Drainage Network • Flowing water erodes landscape and carries away sediment sculpting the topography • Topography defines drainage direction on the landscape and resultant runoff and streamflow accumulation processes Topography defines watersheds which are fundamentally the most basic hydrologic landscape elements. Watershed divide Drainage direction ArcHydro Page 57 Outlet 1:24,000 scale map of a study area in West Austin DEM Elevations 720 720 Contours 740 720 700 680 740 720 700 680 Hydrologic Slope - Direction of Steepest Descent 30 30 80 74 63 80 74 63 69 67 56 69 67 56 60 52 48 60 52 48 67 48 0.45 Slope: 30 2 ArcHydro Page 70 67 52 0.50 30 Eight Direction Pour Point Model 32 64 16 8 128 1 4 2 ESRI Direction encoding ArcHydro Page 69 32 64 128 Flow Direction Grid 16 8 ArcHydro Page 71 1 4 2 2 2 4 4 8 1 2 4 8 4 4 1 2 4 8 2 4 4 4 4 1 2 1 4 16 Flow Direction Grid 32 64 128 16 8 1 4 2 Grid Network ArcHydro Page 71 Flow Accumulation Grid. Area draining in to a grid cell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 4 1 19 1 0 0 0 2 2 10 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 1 14 1 19 0 1 Link to Grid calculator ArcHydro Page 72 Flow Accumulation > 10 Cell Threshold Stream Network for 10 cell Threshold Drainage Area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 1 0 0 4 1 19 1 0 0 0 2 2 10 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 1 14 1 19 0 1 TauDEM contributing area convention. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 2 1 1 15 1 5 2 20 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 11 1 5 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 15 2 25 The area draining each grid cell includes the grid cell itself. 2 Streams with 200 cell Threshold (>18 hectares or 13.5 acres drainage area) Watershed Draining to Outlet Watershed and Drainage Paths Delineated from 30m DEM Automated method is more consistent than hand delineation The Pit Removal Problem • DEM creation results in artificial pits in the landscape • A pit is a set of one or more cells which has no downstream cells around it • Unless these pits are removed they become sinks and isolate portions of the watershed • Pit removal is first thing done with a DEM Pit Filling Increase elevation to the pour point elevation until the pit drains to a neighbor Parallel Approach • Improved runtime efficiency • Capability to run larger problems • Row oriented slices • Each process includes one buffer row on either side • Each process does not change buffer row Pit Removal: Planchon Fill Algorithm Initialization 1st Pass 2nd Pass Planchon, O., and F. Darboux (2001), A fast, simple and versatile algorithm to fill the depressions of digital elevation models, Catena(46), 159-176. Parallel Scheme Communicate Initialize( D,P) Do for all i in P if D(i) > n P(i) ← D(i) Else P(i) ← n endfor Send( topRow, rank-1 ) Send( bottomRow, rank+1 ) Recv( rowBelow, rank+1 ) Recv( rowAbove, rank-1 ) Until P is not modified D denotes the original elevation. P denotes the pit filled elevation. n denotes lowest neighboring elevation i denotes the cell being evaluated Parallel pit fill timing for large DEM 2500 NedB (14849 x 27174) 1500 1000 500 Read 0 Seconds 2000 ArcGIS 2087 sec 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Processors Dual Quad Core Xeon Proc E5405, 2.00GHz 8 Carving Lower elevation of neighbor along a predefined drainage path until the pit drains to the outlet point Filling Carving Minimizing Alterations “Burning In” the Streams Take a mapped stream network and a DEM Make a grid of the streams Raise the off-stream DEM cells by an arbitrary elevation increment Produces "burned in" DEM streams = mapped streams + = AGREE Elevation Grid Modification Methodology – DEM Reconditioning PLAN GRID CELL SIZE A A SECTION A-A GRID CELL SIZE ELEVATION RESOLUTION MODIFIED ELEVATION ORIGINAL ELEVATION KNOWN STREAM LOCATION AND STREAM DELINEATED FROM MODIFIED ELEVATION STREAM DELINEATED FROM ORIGINAL ELEVATION Stream Segments 201 172 202 203 206 204 ArcHydro Page 74 209 Each link has a unique identifying number Vectorized Streams Linked Using Grid Code to Cell Equivalents Vector Streams Grid Streams ArcHydro Page 75 DrainageLines are drawn through the centers of cells on the stream links. DrainagePoints are located at the centers of the outlet cells of the catchments ArcHydro Page 75 Catchments • For every stream segment, there is a corresponding catchment • Catchments are a tessellation of the landscape through a set of physical rules Raster Zones and Vector Polygons One to one connection DEM GridCode Catchment GridID 4 3 5 Raster Zones Vector Polygons Catchments, DrainageLines and DrainagePoints of the San Marcos basin ArcHydro Page 75 Adjoint catchment: the remaining upstream area draining to a catchment outlet. ArcHydro Page 77 Catchment, Watershed, Subwatershed. Subwatersheds Catchments Watershed Watershed outlet points may lie within the interior of a catchment, e.g. at a USGS stream-gaging site. ArcHydro Page 76 Summary of Key Processing Steps • • • • • • • • [DEM Reconditioning] Pit Removal (Fill Sinks) Flow Direction Flow Accumulation Stream Definition Stream Segmentation Catchment Grid Delineation Raster to Vector Conversion (Catchment Polygon, Drainage Line, Catchment Outlet Points) Arc Hydro Tools • Distributed free of charge from ESRI Water Resources Applications • Version 1.3 Latest release http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=downloads. dataModels.filteredGateway&dmid=15 • Start with a DEM • Produce a set of DEM-derived raster products • Convert these to vector (point, line, area) features • Add and link Arc Hydro attributes • Compute catchment characteristics Delineation of Channel Networks and Catchments 500 cell theshold 1000 cell theshold 3 AREA 1 12 10 1 Dd = 760 A-0.507 Mawheraiti Gold Creek 0.1 AREA 2 Drainage Density (1/km) How to decide on stream delineation threshold ? 10000 Choconut and Tracy Creeks 100000 1000000 2 Drainage Area Threshold (m ) Drainage density (total channel length divided by drainage area) as a function of drainage area support threshold used to define channels for the three study watersheds. Why is it important? Hydrologic processes are different on hillslopes and in channels. It is important to recognize this and account for this in models. Area defining concentrated contributing area at P Contour width b P Specific catchment area is A/b Flow path originating at divide with dispersed contributing area A Drainage area can be concentrated or dispersed (specific catchment area) representing concentrated or dispersed flow. Examples of differently textured topography Badlands in Death Valley. from Easterbrook, 1993, p 140. Coos Bay, Oregon Coast Range. from W. E. Dietrich Logged Pacific Redwood Forest near Humboldt, California Canyon Creek, Trinity Alps, Northern California. Photo D K Hagans Gently Sloping Convex Landscape From W. E. Dietrich Mancos Shale badlands, Utah. From Howard, 1994. Topographic Texture and Drainage Density Driftwood, PA 0 Driftwood, PA 1 Kilometers Same scale, 20 m contour interval 0 Sunland, CA Sunland, CA 1 Kilometers “landscape dissection into distinct valleys is limited by a threshold of channelization that sets a finite scale to the landscape.” (Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992, Science, vol. 255 p. 826.) Suggestion: One contributing area threshold does not fit all watersheds. Lets look at some geomorphology. • Drainage Density • Horton’s Laws • Slope – Area scaling • Stream Drops Drainage Density • Dd = L/A • Hillslope length 1/2Dd B B Hillslope length = B L A = 2B L Dd = L/A = 1/2B B= 1/2Dd Drainage Density for Different Support Area Thresholds EPA Reach Files 100 grid cell threshold 1000 grid cell threshold D d k m ^ 1 0.8 2.0 3.0 Drainage Density Versus Contributing Area Threshold D d=0. 0. 0. 05 10 0. 1. 50 0 Suppo Hortons Laws: Strahler system for stream ordering 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Bifurcation Ratio = N1 umberofStams5 10 50 Rb 12345 Order M e a n S t r m A e a 10^6 5*10^6 5*10^7 Area Ratio Ra = 4. 6 12345 Order M e90 anStrmLengh 20 40 Length Ratio Rl = 12345 Order MeanStrmlope 0.5 0.1 Slope Ratio Rs = 1. 1. 2. 0 2. 5 3. 0 3. 5 4. 0 5 0 Order MeanStrmD5o0p 10 50 Constant Stream Drops Law Rd = 0. 1. 1. 2. 0 2. 5 3. 0 3. 5 4. 0 5 0 Order Broscoe, A. J., (1959), "Quantitative analysis of longitudinal stream profiles of small watersheds," Office of Naval Research, Project NR 389-042, Technical Report No. 18, Department of Geology, Columbia University, New York. Stream Drop Elevation difference between ends of stream Nodes Links Single Stream Note that a “Strahler stream” comprises a sequence of links (reaches or segments) of the same order Suggestion: Map channel networks from the DEM at the finest resolution consistent with observed channel network geomorphology ‘laws’. • Look for statistically significant break in constant stream drop property as stream delineation threshold is reduced • Break in slope versus contributing area relationship • Physical basis in the form instability theory of Smith and Bretherton (1972), see Tarboton et al. 1992 Statistical Analysis of Stream Drops Elevation Drop for Streams 600 Drop (meters) 500 400 Drop Mean Drop 300 200 100 0 0 1 2 3 Strahler Order 4 5 6 T-Test for Difference in Mean Values Mean X Std X Var X Nx 0 Order 1 72.2 68.8 4740.0 268 72 Mean Y Std Y Var Y Ny Order 2-4 130.3 120.8 14594.5 81 130 T-test checks whether difference in means is large (> 2) when compared to the spread of the data around the mean values S t r a h l e m D r o p ( ) 0 50 10 150 20 250 Constant Support Area Threshold 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 Str a h le r Support Area threshold (30 m grid cells) 50 100 200 300 500 Drainage Density (km-1) 3.3 2.3 1.7 1.4 1.2 -8.8 -5 -1.8 -1.1 -0.72 t statistic for difference between lowest order and higher order drops S 100 grid cell constant support area threshold stream delineation 1 0 1 Kilometers Constant support area threshold 100 grid cell 9 x 10E4 m^2 200 grid cell constant support area based stream delineation 1 0 1 Kilometers constant support area threshold 200 grid cell 18 x 10E4 m^2 Local Curvature Computation (Peuker and Douglas, 1975, Comput. Graphics Image Proc. 4:375) 43 48 48 51 51 56 41 47 47 54 54 58 Contributing area of upwards curved grid cells only 50mcont.shp Topsrc 0 1-5 5-20 20-50 50-30000 No Data 1 0 1 2 Kilometers S t r a h l e m D r o p ( ) 0 50 10 150 20 250 Upward Curved Contributing Area Threshold 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 Str a h le r Upward curved support area threshold (30 m grid cells) 10 15 20 30 Drainage Density (km-1) 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.4 -4.1 -2.2 -1.3 -1.2 t statistic for difference between lowest order and higher order drops S Curvature based stream delineation 1 0 1 Kilometers Curvature based Stream delineation Channel network delineation, other options 4 2 3 5 6 1 7 8 Contributing Area Grid Order 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 12 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 16 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 6 25 2 1 2 2 3 1 Grid network pruned to order 4 stream delineation 1 0 1 Kilometers Grid network pruned to 4th order Slope area threshold (Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992). Channels mapped using a S2 > 200 m. a is specific catchment area and S is slope. downslope Proportion flowing to neighboring grid cell 3 is 2/(1+2) flowing to neighboring grid cell 4 is 1/(1+2) TauDEM - Channel Network and Watershed Delineation Software • Pit removal (standard flooding approach) 3 4 5 6 2 1 2 1 8 7 Flow direction measured as counter-clockwise angle from east. • Flow directions and slope – D8 (standard) – D (Tarboton, 1997, WRR 33(2):309) – Flat routing (Garbrecht and Martz, 1997, JOH 193:204) • Drainage area (D8 and D) • Network and watershed delineation – Support area threshold/channel maintenance coefficient (Standard) – Combined area-slope threshold (Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992, Science, 255:826) – Local curvature based (using Peuker and Douglas, 1975, Comput. Graphics Image Proc. 4:375) • Threshold/drainage density selection by stream drop analysis (Tarboton et al., 1991, Hyd. Proc. 5(1):81) • Other Functions: Downslope Influence, Upslope Dependence, Wetness index, distance to streams, Transport limited accumulation Available from http://www.engineering.usu.edu/dtarb/ Summary Concepts • The eight direction pour point model approximates the surface flow using eight discrete grid directions • The elevation surface represented by a grid digital elevation model is used to derive surfaces representing other hydrologic variables of interest such as – – – – Slope Flow direction Drainage area Catchments, watersheds and channel networks Summary Concepts (2) • Hydrologic processes are different between hillslopes and channels • Drainage density defines the average spacing between streams and the representative length of hillslopes • The constant drop property provides a basis for selecting channel delineation criteria to preserve the natural drainage density of the topography • Generalized channel delineation criteria can represent spatial variability in the topographic texture and drainage density Are there any questions ? AREA 2 3 AREA 1 12