Transcript School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Overview George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May 22, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org [email protected].

School-Wide Positive
Behavior Support:
Overview
George Sugai
OSEP Center on PBIS
Center for Behavioral Education & Research
University of Connecticut
May 22, 2008
www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org
[email protected]
PURPOSE
Provide overview of
rationale, features, &
outcomes of schoolwide approach to
positive behavior
supports
OUTCOME OBJECTIVES
• Rationale for adopting proactive
systems approach to improving school
climate
• Features of School-wide Positive
Behavior Support
• Examples of SWPBS implementation
• Samples of Outcome Data
SWPBS is about….
Improving
classroom &
school climate
Integrating
Decreasing
academic &
reactive
behavior
management
initiatives
Improving
support for
students w/
EBD
Maximizing
academic
achievement
SW-PBS Logic!
Successful individual student
behavior support is linked to
host environments or school
climates that are effective,
efficient, relevant, & durable
(Zins & Ponti, 1990)
2 Worries & Ineffective
Responses to Problem
Behavior
• Get Tough (practices)
• Train-&-Hope (systems)
Worry #1
“Teaching” by Getting Tough
Runyon: “I hate this f____ing
school, & you’re a dumbf_____.”
Teacher: “That is disrespectful
language. I’m sending you to the
office so you’ll learn never to say
those words again….starting
now!”
Immediate & seductive
solution….”Get Tough!”
• Clamp down & increase monitoring
• Re-re-re-review rules
• Extend continuum & consistency of
consequences
• Establish “bottom line”
...Predictable individual response
Reactive responses are
predictable….
When we experience aversive
situation, we select interventions
that produce immediate relief
– Remove student
– Remove ourselves
– Modify physical environment
– Assign responsibility for change to
student &/or others
When behavior doesn’t
improve, we “Get Tougher!”
• Zero tolerance policies
• Increased surveillance
• Increased suspension & expulsion
• In-service training by expert
• Alternative programming
…..Predictable systems response!
Erroneous assumption that
student…
• Is inherently “bad”
• Will learn more appropriate
behavior through increased use
of “aversives”
• Will be better tomorrow…….
But….false sense of
safety/security!
• Fosters environments of control
• Triggers & reinforces antisocial behavior
• Shifts accountability away from school
• Devalues child-adult relationship
• Weakens relationship between academic
& social behavior programming
Science of behavior has
taught us that students….
• Are NOT born with “bad behaviors”
• Do NOT learn when presented
contingent aversive consequences
……..Do learn better ways of
behaving by being taught
directly & receiving positive
feedback
VIOLENCE PREVENTION?
• Positive, predictable school-wide
climate
• Surgeon General’s
Report on Youth
Violence (2001)
• Formal social skills instruction
• Coordinated Social
Emotional &
Learning
(Greenberg et al.,
2003)
• Positive active supervision &
reinforcement
• Center for Study &
Prevention of
Violence (2006)
• Positive adult role models
• White House
Conference on
School Violence
(2006)
• High rates of academic & social
success
• Multi-component, multi-year
school-family-community effort
Worry #2:
“Train & Hope”
WAIT for
New
Problem
Expect, But
HOPE for
Implementation
Hire EXPERT
to Train
Practice
REACT to
Problem
Behavior
Select &
ADD
Practice
Supporting Social Competence &
Academic Achievement
4 PBS
Elements
OUTCOMES
Supporting
Decision
Making
Supporting
Staff Behavior
PRACTICES
Supporting
Student Behavior
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL &
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
~5%
~15%
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
Designing School-Wide Systems
for Student Success
Academic Systems
Behavioral Systems
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•High Intensity
1-5%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
Universal Interventions
•All students
•Preventive, proactive
5-10%
80-90%
1-5%
Intensive, Individual Interventions
•Individual Students
•Assessment-based
•Intense, durable procedures
5-10%
Targeted Group Interventions
•Some students (at-risk)
•High efficiency
•Rapid response
80-90%
Universal Interventions
•All settings, all students
•Preventive, proactive
Main Messages
STUDENT
ACHIEVEMENT
Good Teaching
Behavior Management
Increasing District & State Competency and Capacity
Investing in Outcomes, Data, Practices, and Systems
IMPLEMENTATION
W/ FIDELITY
UNIVERSAL
SCREENING
RtI
CONTINUUM OF
EVIDENCE-BASED
INTERVENTIONS
DATA-BASED
DECISION MAKING
STUDENT
& PROBLEM
PERFORMANCE
SOLVING
CONTINUOUS
PROGRESS
MONITORING
CONTINUUM of SWPBS
TERTIARY PREVENTION
• Function-based support
• Wraparound/PCP
Audit
• Special Education
~5%•
1. Identify existing practices
•
~15%
•
•
•
•
•
by tier
2. Specify outcome for each effort
SECONDARY PREVENTION
Check in/out
3. Evaluate
implementation
Targeted social
skills instruction
Peer-based supports
accuracy & outcome
Social skills club
effectiveness
Eliminate/integrate based on
PRIMARY4.
PREVENTION
• Teach & encourage positive
outcomes
SW expectations
• Proactive SW discipline
5. Establish decision rules (RtI)
• Effective instruction
• Parent engagement
•
~80% of Students
Development “Map”
• 2+ years of primary intervention team training
• Annual “booster” events
• On-going development specialized secondary
& tertiary intervention capacity
• Coaching/facilitator support @ school &
district levels
• Regular self-assessment & evaluation data
• Local school/district/state leadership teams
• State/region/Center TA coordination
Role of “Coaching”
• Liaison between school teams &
PBS leadership team
• Local facilitation of process
• Local resource for data-based
decision making
PBS Systems Implementation Logic
Funding
Visibility
Political
Support
Leadership Team
Active & Integrated Coordination
Training
Coaching
Evaluation
Local School Teams/Demonstrations
GENERAL
IMPLEMENTATION
PROCESS:
“Getting Started”
Team
Agreements
Data-based
Action Plan
Evaluation
Implementation
Team-led Process
Family
Priority &
Status
Specialized Support
Non-Teaching
Behavioral
Capacity
Representation
Administrator
Team
Data-based
Decision
Making
Student
Community
Administrator
Communications
Teaching
Start with
Team that
“Works.”
Working Smarter
Initiative,
Project,
Committee
Attendance
Committee
Character
Education
Safety
Committee
School Spirit
Committee
Discipline
Committee
DARE
Committee
EBS Work
Group
Purpose
Outcome
Target
Group
Staff
Involved
SIP/SID/e
tc
Sample Teaming Matrix
Initiative,
Committee
Purpose
Outcome
Target
Group
Staff
Involved
SIP/SID
Attendance
Committee
Increase
attendance
Increase % of
students attending
daily
All students
Eric, Ellen,
Marlee
Goal #2
Character
Education
Improve
character
Improve character
All students
Marlee, J.S.,
Ellen
Goal #3
Safety
Committee
Improve safety
Predictable response
to threat/crisis
Dangerous
students
Has not met
Goal #3
School Spirit
Committee
Enhance school
spirit
Improve morale
All students
Has not met
Discipline
Committee
Improve behavior
Decrease office
referrals
Bullies,
antisocial
students,
repeat
offenders
Ellen, Eric,
Marlee, Otis
DARE
Committee
Prevent drug use
High/at-risk
drug users
Don
EBS Work Group
Implement 3-tier
model
All students
Eric, Ellen,
Marlee, Otis,
Emma
Decrease office
referrals, increase
attendance, enhance
academic
engagement, improve
grades
Goal #3
Goal #2
Goal #3
Top 3 SchoolWide
Initiatives
Coaching &
Facilitation
3-4 Year
Commitment
Agreements &
Supports
Dedicated
Resources
& Time
3-Tiered
Prevention
Logic
Administrative
Participation
Self-Assessment
Efficient
Systems of Data
Management
Team-based
Decision
Making
SWIS
Data-based
Action Plan
EvidenceBased
Practices
Existing
Discipline
Data
Multiple
Systems
Office Re fe rrals pe r Day pe r M onth
A v e R efer r als per D ay
Last Year and This Year
20
15
10
5
0
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
School Months
Apr
May
Jun
N um ber of O ffic e R efer r als
Referrals by Location
50
40
30
20
10
0
B ath R B us A
B us
C af
C lass C omm
Gym
H all
School Locations
Libr
P lay G S pec
Other
N um ber of R efer r als
Referrals by Problem
Re fe rr als
pe r Prob Be havior
Behavior
50
40
30
20
10
0
L a n g Ac h o l Ars o n Bo m bCo m b sDe f i a nDi s ru p tDre s sAg g / f g tT h e f tHa ra s sPro p D Sk i p T a rd y T o b a c Va n d W e a p
Types of Problem Behavior
Referrals per Location
N um ber of O ffic e R efer r als
Referrals by Location
50
40
30
20
10
0
B ath R B us A
B us
C af
C lass C omm
Gym
H all
School Locations
Libr
P lay G S pec
Other
N um ber of R efer r als per S tudent
Referrals per Student
20
10
0
Students
Referrals by Time of Day
N um ber of R efer r als
Re fe rrals by Tim e of Day
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
7 : 0 0 7 : 3 0 8 : 0 0 8 : 3 0 9 : 0 0 9 : 3 0 1 0 : 0 01 0 : 3 01 1 : 0 01 1 : 3 01 2 : 0 01 2 : 3 0 1 : 0 0 1 : 3 0 2 : 0 0 2 : 3 0 3 : 0 0 3 : 3 0
Time of Day
SWPBS
Subsystems
Classroom
Non-classroom
Student
Family
School-wide
1. Common purpose & approach to discipline
2. Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors
3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior
4. Continuum of procedures for encouraging
expected behavior
5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging
inappropriate behavior
6. Procedures for on-going monitoring &
evaluation
Non-classroom
• Positive expectations & routines
taught & encouraged
• Active supervision by all staff
– Scan, move, interact
• Precorrections & reminders
• Positive reinforcement
Classroom
• Classroom-wide positive expectations taught
& encouraged
• Teaching classroom routines & cues taught &
encouraged
• Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adultstudent interaction
• Active supervision
• Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior
errors
• Frequent precorrections for chronic errors
• Effective academic instruction & curriculum
Individual Student
• Behavioral competence at school & district
levels
• Function-based behavior support planning
• Team- & data-based decision making
• Comprehensive person-centered planning &
wraparound processes
• Targeted social skills & self-management
instruction
• Individualized instructional & curricular
accommodations
Family
• Continuum of positive behavior support
for all families
• Frequent, regular positive contacts,
communications, & acknowledgements
• Formal & active participation &
involvement as equal partner
• Access to system of integrated school &
community resources
Few positive SW expectations defined,
taught, & encouraged
Teaching Academics &
Behaviors
ADJUST for
Efficiency
MONITOR &
ACKNOWLEDGE
Continuously
DEFINE
Simply
MODEL
PRACTICE
In Setting
SETTING
TEACHING
MATRIX
Expectations
All
Settings
Hallways
Playgrounds
Cafeteria
Library/
Computer
Lab
Study,
read,
compute.
Sit in one
spot.
Watch for
your stop.
Assembly
Bus
Respect
Ourselves
Be on task.
Give your
best effort.
Be
prepared.
Walk.
Have a plan.
Eat all your
food.
Select
healthy
foods.
Respect
Others
Be kind.
Hands/feet
to self.
Help/share
with
others.
Use normal
voice
volume.
Walk to
right.
Play safe.
Include
others.
Share
equipment.
Practice
good table
manners
Whisper.
Return
books.
Listen/watch.
Use
appropriate
applause.
Use a quiet
voice.
Stay in your
seat.
Recycle.
Clean up
after self.
Pick up
litter.
Maintain
physical
space.
Use
equipment
properly.
Put litter in
garbage can.
Replace
trays &
utensils.
Clean up
eating
area.
Push in
chairs.
Treat
books
carefully.
Pick up.
Treat chairs
appropriately.
Wipe your
feet.
Sit
appropriately.
Respect
Property
“Cool Tool”
Skill Name
Getting Help
(How to ask for assistance for difficulty tasks)
Teaching Examples
1. When you’re working on a math problem that you can’t figure out, raise your hand
and wait until the teacher can help you.
2. You and a friend are working together on a science experiment but you are missing a
piece of lab equipment, ask the teacher for the missing equipment.
3. You are reading a story but you don’t know the meaning of most of the words, ask the
teacher to read and explain the word.
Kid Activity
1. Ask 2-3 students to give an example of a situation in which they needed help to
complete a task, activity, or direction.
2. Ask students to indicate or show how they could get help.
3. Encourage and support appropriate discussion/responses. Minimize attention for
inappropriate responses.
After the Lesson
(During the Day)
1. Just before giving students difficult or new task, direction, or activity, ask them to tell
you how they could get help if they have difficulty (precorrection).
2. When you see students having difficulty with a task (e.g., off task, complaining), ask
them to indicate that they need help (reminder).
3. Whenever a student gets help the correct way, provide specific praise to the student.
“Traveling Passports”
• Precorrecting new kids in Tigard,
Oregon
• Procedures
– Meet with key adults
– Review expectations
– Go to class
Character Education
• Easy to change moral knowledge.....
...difficult to change moral conduct
• To change moral conduct...
– Adults must model moral behavior
– Students must experience academic success
– Students must be taught social skills for
success
Acknowledging SW
Expectations: Rationale
• To learn, humans require regular &
frequent feedback on their actions
• Humans experience frequent feedback
from others, self, & environment
– Planned/unplanned
– Desirable/undesirable
• W/o formal feedback to encourage
desired behavior, other forms of
feedback shape undesired behaviors
Acknowledge & Recognize
OMMS Business Partner Ticket
6
7
8
Date: ________________
Student Name __________________________________
For Demonstrating: Safety
Ethics
Respect
(Circle the trait you observed)
Comments: ___________________________________________
Authorized Signature: ____________________________________
Business Name: ________________________________________
Grand Junction CO 5/06
Are “Rewards” Dangerous?
“…our research team has conducted a series
of reviews and analysis of (the reward)
literature; our conclusion is that there is no
inherent negative property of reward. Our
analyses indicate that the argument against
the use of rewards is an overgeneralization
based on a narrow set of circumstances.”
– Cameron, 2002
• Cameron & Pierce, 1994, 2002
• Cameron, Banko & Pierce, 2001
Reinforcement Wisdom!
• “Knowing” or saying “know” does
NOT mean “will do”
• Students “do more” when “doing
works”…appropriate & inappropriate!
• Natural consequences are varied,
unpredictable, undependable,…not
always preventive
Team Managed
Staff
Acknowledgements
Effective
Practices
Implementation
Continuous
Monitoring
Administrator
Participation
Staff Training
& Support
Team-based
Decision Making &
Planning
Relevant &
Measurable
Indicators
Efficient
Input, Storage, &
Retrieval
Evaluation
Continuous
Monitoring
Effective
Visual Displays
Regular
Review
T otal O ffic e D is c ipl ine R efer r al
Kennedy Middle School
1500
1200
900
600
300
0
95-96
96-97
97-98
School Years
98-99
FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals
Sustained Impact
3000
Pre
Total ODRs
2500
2000
Post
1500
1000
500
0
94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Academic Years
Next Steps
• Organize data to demonstrate need for
SWPBS
• Secure Principal agreement, participation,
& leadership
• Present rationale/need to staff & secure
agreement to move forward
• Establish leadership team that works
• Complete other readiness requirements