Orthopaedic Trauma Jeremy Hall St. Michael’s Hospital September 29, 2009 Outline  Compartment Syndrome  Open Fractures  Pelvic Fractures.

Download Report

Transcript Orthopaedic Trauma Jeremy Hall St. Michael’s Hospital September 29, 2009 Outline  Compartment Syndrome  Open Fractures  Pelvic Fractures.

Orthopaedic
Trauma
Jeremy Hall
St. Michael’s Hospital
September 29, 2009
Outline
 Compartment Syndrome
 Open Fractures
 Pelvic Fractures
Compartment Syndrome
Definition
 Elevated tissue pressure within a closed fascial space
 Reduces tissue perfusion
 Results in cell death
 Pathogenesis
 Too much inflow (edema, hemorrhage)
 Decreased outflow (venous obstruction, tight
dressing/cast)
Compartment Syndrome…
Pathophysiology
 Normal tissue pressure
 0-4 mm Hg
 8-10 with exertion
 Absolute pressure threshold
 30 mm Hg - Mubarak
 45 mm Hg - Matsen
 Pressure gradient threshold
 < 20 - 30 mm Hg within diastolic pressure – Whitesides
 McQueen, et al
Compartment Syndrome…
Tissue Survival
 Muscle
 3-4 hours - reversible changes
 6 hours - variable damage
 8 hours - irreversible changes
 Nerve
 2 hours - decreased nerve conduction
 4 hours - neuropraxia
 8 hours - irreversible changes
Compartment Syndrome…
Etiology
 Fractures-closed and open
 Exertional states
 Blunt trauma
 GSW
 Temp vascular occlusion
 IV/A-lines
 Cast/dressing
 Hemophiliac/coagulopathy
 Closure of fascial defects
 Intraosseous IV(infant)
 Burns/electrical
 Snake bite
 Arterial injury
Compartment Syndrome…
Diagnosis
 Pain out of proportion to injury
 Pain with passive stretch
 Palpably tense compartment
 Paresthesia/hypoesthesia
 Paralysis
 Pulselessness/pallor
Compartment Syndrome…
Emergent Treatment
 Remove cast or dressing
 Place limb at level of heart
(DO NOT ELEVATE to optimize perfusion)
 Alert OR and Anesthesia
 Bedside procedure
 Medical treatment
 Consider coexistent crush
 ? Renal ‘prophylaxis’
 Maximize cardiac output
Compartment Syndrome…
Surgical Treatment
 Fasciotomy –
 prophylactic release of pressure before permanent damage occurs.
 Will not reverse injury from trauma.
 GOAL: RESTORE PERFUSION
 Fracture care –
 Rigid stabilization
 Ex-fix
 IM Nail (locking optional)
Compartment Syndrome…
Indications for Fasciotomy
 Unequivocal clinical findings
 Pressure within 15-20 (30) mm hg of DBP
 Rising tissue pressure
 Significant tissue injury or high risk pt
 > 6 hours of total limb ischemia
 Injury at high risk of compartment syndrome
 CONTRAINDICATION –
 Missed CS (>24-48 hrs)
Leg Fasciotomies
 2 Generous skin incisions
(Mubarak 1977)
 medial
 lateral
 Release completely all 4
fascial compartments
 Beware of neurovascular
structures to prevent
iatrogenic injury
Compartment Syndrome…
Other Areas
 Can occur anywhere in the body
 Hand
 Arm
 Buttock/thigh
 BEWARE arterial injury….consider angiogram
 Abdominal
 With you general surgeons!
Outcomes…
 Heemskerk et al, World J Surg, 2003
40 successive cases
6 cases; ACS from Gen Surg procedures in lithotomy position
Majority trauma/vascular cases
15% MORTALITY
12% amputation
Dysfunctional limb; 27%
 Functional; 45%
 AGE most significant factor






 Finkelstein et al
 Fasciotomy for ‘missed’ compartment syndrome
 50% incidence; death, sepsis, deep infection
Open Fractures
 All fractures have some
degree of soft tissue injury
 Prognosis determined by:
 Amount of energy
transferred to the soft
tissue and bone
 Degree of contamination
and type of bacteria
 Patient factors
Introduction
 Energy Transfer
 Fall from curb
 100 ft-lbs
 Skiing
 300-500 ft-lbs
 High-Velocity GSW
 2000 ft-lbs
 Automobile Bumper @
20 MPH
 100,000 ft-lbs
Skin Lesions
 Blisters
 Clear
 Sanguineous
 Abrasions
 Degloving
 Morel-Lavalle
Open Fracture
 Definition
 A break in the skin
and soft tissues
communicating with
a fracture or its
hematoma.
Gustilo-Anderson
Grade I
Gustilo-Anderson
Grade II
Gustilo-Anderson
Grade IIIA
Gustilo-Anderson
Grade IIIA
IIIA Includes severe
comminution despite size of
skin wound.
Gustilo-Anderson
Grade IIIB
Gustilo-Anderson
Grade IIIC
Assessment
 History
 Mechanism
 High or low
energy?
 Time since injury
 Pre-morbid conditions
 Other injuries
Assessment
 Physical Exam
 One look soft tissue
exam
 Neurological status
 Vascular status
 Compartments
Assessment
 X-rays
 Standard two 90°
views
 Joint above and
below fracture
Emergent Treatment
 One Look Exam
 Sterile Dressing
 No ER Cultures
 Poor indicator of
probability of infection
and organism
 expensive
 Realign and Splint
Tetanus Toxoid
Tetanus Toxoid 2.5 cc to all poly-trauma patients, otherwise:
IMMUNIZATION HISTORY
NON-TETANUS
PRONE
TETANUS PRONE*
UNKNOWN
YES
YES
>3 IMMUNIZATIONS
(<5 YEARS)
NO
NO
*Tetanus Prone: >6 hours old, complex soft tissue injury, wound >1 cm deep,
missile, crush, burn, frostbite, devitalized tissues, soil contaminants, denervated,
ischemic, early infection.
Tetanus Immune Globulin
250-500 units IM:
IMMUNIZATION HISTORY
NON-TETANUS
PRONE
TETANUS PRONE*
UNKNOWN
NO
YES
>3 IMMUNIZATIONS
(<5 YEARS)
NO
NO
Bacteriology of Open Fractures
Blunt Trauma, Low Energy GSW
Staph, Strept
Farm Wounds
Clostridia
Fresh Water
Pseudomonas, Aeromonas
Sea Water
Aeromonas, Vibrios
War Wounds, High Energy GSW
Gram Negative
Recommended Antibiotic Treatment
1 Gen Ceph
Grade I
Grade II
Grade III
Farm/War
Wounds
Gent
PCN


+/-


+/-



(Gustilo, et al; JBJS 72A 1990)
Duration of Antibiotic Treatment
Initial 72 hours
48 hours after each subsequent
procedure
Treatment
Principles
Limb Salvage?
Vascular Injury?
Principles of I&D
 Longitudinal incisions-
extensile exposures
 Excise non viable
tissue
 Systematic and
detailed approach
 Irrigation
 Stabilize fracture
I&D
Systematic
Skin
Fascia and fat
Muscle: 4 C’s of
muscle viability
 Contractility
 Capacity to bleed
 Consistency
 Color
Stable Fixation
 Reduces infection
 Options:
 External fixation
 +/- delayed
internal fixation
 IM Nail
 ORIF
Wound Closure
 Primary Closure?
 Delayed closure/coverage
 STSG
 Flaps
 VAC
Pelvic Ring
Injuries
Epidemiology
 Pelvic fractures account 1-3% of all fxs
 60% Male
 Mechanism
 MVC (57-71%)
 Collision w/ pedestrian (13-18%)
 Motorcycle accident (5-9%)
 Falls (4-9%)
 Crush injury (4-5%)
Epidemiology
 Overall reported mortality figures for pelvic
injuries range from 8%-13%
 Higher energy injuries greater mortality
 Peds vs car (23%)
Poole GV, Ward EF: Causes of mortality in patients with pelvic fractures, Orthop 17:691,
1994.
Pohlemann T et al: Pelvic fractures: epidemiology, therapy and long term outcome.
Overview of the multicenter studey of the pelvis study group, Unfallchirurg 99:160, 1996.
Key Point
 Presence of a pelvic fracture indicates the
profound magnitude of disruptive energy
at the time of injury
 Alerts to likelihood of major injury to other
body systems
Pelvic fractures bad, associated injuries very bad!
Pelvic Anatomy
 Inominate bones (2)
 ilium, ischium & pubis
 Sacrum
 Coccyx
Pelvic Anatomy
 Pelvis contains 5 joints
 Lumbosacral
 Sacroiliac
 Sacrococcygeal
 Symphysis pubis
 Acetabulum *movement*
Pelvic Amatomy
 Ring structure is basis
for stability
 Stability via ligaments
 Iliolumbar
 Sacroiliac
 Sacrotuberous
 Sacrospinous
Pelvic Anatomy
 Pelvis is extremely vascular
 Majority of blood from
hypogastrics (internal iliac)
 Proximity to pelvic arch
 Superior gluteal: largest
branch, commonly injured in
posterior fxs
 Obturator & internal
pudendal often injured in fxs
involving pubic rami
Pelvic Anatomy
 Nerve supply from
lumbar & sacral plexi
 Proximity to posterior
arch of pelvic ring
Pelvic Radiography
 Unique skeletal evaluation in trauma setting
 Only one view is obtained
 AP Pelvis
 Most injuries can be identified
 More commonly missed
 Acetabulum, sacroiliac joints, sacrum
 May not define the extent of the injury
AP Pelvis
 Adequacy:
 Both iliac crests
 Proximal femurs
 Lower lumbar spine
 No rotation
 Pubic symphysis aligns
midline with sacral
spinous processes
Pelvic CT
 CT has replaced




supplementary plain-films
Greater anatomic detail
The best study for
acetabular & sacral fxs
Assesses extent of
instability
Evaluates retroperitoneal
hematoma
Pelvic CT
 Specific indications for pelvic CT
 Acetabular fractures
 Dislocations of the hip
 All potential or recognized sacral fractures
 All potential or recognized SI injuries
 Question of instability
 Patient must be hemodynamically stable
Hunter JC, Brandser EA, Tran KA. Pelvic and acetabular trauma. Radiol
Clin North Am. 1997;35:559-590.
Angiography
 Method of diagnosing &
controlling life-threatening arterial
hemorrhage in pelvic fractures
 Indicated in hemodynamic
instability when…
 Thoracic source r/o
 External source r/o
 Negative DPL
 Presence of pelvic fx
 Use in conjunction with
mechanical fracture stabilization
(Ex-Fix)
Tile Classification
Tile Type A
Stable
Tile Type B
Rotationally Unstable
Vertically Stable
Tile Type C
Rotationally Unstable
Vertically Unstable
Young & Burgess Classification
Mechanism of Injury & Direction of Force
 Three patterns
 Lateral compression (50%)
 Pedestrian struck on side by car
 MVC in which car is broadsided
 AP compression/open book (25%)
 Head-on MVC
 Pedestrian struck anteriorly by car
 Vertical Shear (5%)
 Fall or jump from height
 Combination (20%)
Young & Burgess Classification
Lateral Compression
AP Compression
Vertical Shear
Lateral Compression: LC-III
Windswept Pelvis
Contralateral
sacral fx & SI
joint diastasis
Ipsilateral SI disruption
Iliac wing fracture
Pubic rami
fractures
AP Compression: APC-III
Wide SI Joint
Wide Pubic Symphysis
Vertical Shear
 Least common
 Vertical force
 Fall from height, landing on LE
 Pelvis disrupted in vertical plane
 Cephaloposterior
displacement
 Malgaigne fracture
 Grossly unstable!
 High incidence of neurovascular
injury
Vertical Shear
 Left hemipelvis
displaced cephaloposteriorly
 Associated sacroiliac
joint diastasis
 Pubic rami fracture
 Ipsilateral (usually)
 Vertically oriented
Vertical Shear
Complete disruption of posterior elements
Factors Increasing Mortality
 Type of pelvic ring injury
 Posterior disruption
 High ISS
 Tile, 1980
 McMurty, 1980
 Hemorrhagic shock on admission
 Gilliland, 1982
Factors Increasing Mortality
 Requirement for large quantities of blood
 24 u vs. 7 u, McMurty, 1980
 Perineal lacerations, open fractures
 Hanson, 1991
 Associated injuries
 Head & abdominal, 50% mortality
 Age
 Looser, 1976
Extremely High Energy Injuries
with a Large Number and
Variety of Associated Injuries
Instability
Shock
Etiology of Hypovolemic Shock
 Intra-thoracic bleeding
 Intra-peritoneal bleeding
 Ultrasound
 Peritoneal tap
 CT
 Retroperitoneal bleeding
Burgess, J Trauma 1990
 Mortality 8.6%
 2/210 pelvic injury patients where pelvic injury was
primary cause of death
 Contributed 10/210
Adams, JOT 2003
 Up to 25% pelvic fractures in traffic fatalities
 Most commonly vertically unstable fractures
 Perhaps more common than originally thought
Hemorrhage Control
 Average blood replacement (units)
 LC = 3.6
 AP = 14.8
 VS = 9.2
 Mortality
 3% hemodynamically stable patients
 38% unstable patients
Hemorrhage (cont.)
 Sheet/C-clamp
 Skeletal traction
 External fixation
 Mast suit
 Embolization
 Surgical stabilization +/- packing
Hemorrhage (cont.)
 Contributes to 60% of deaths
 Retroperitoneal veins
 20% arterial injury
Coagulopathy
 Hypothermia
  Ca2 (blood citrate)
 Acidotic
Prolonged Hypovolemia
 Aggravate pulmonary contusion
 Head and visceral injuries
 Increased sepsis
 Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
 Multiple organ failure
Instability
Only patients with mechanical
instability can have hemodynamic
instability related to the pelvic injury
Radiographic Signs of Instability
 Sacroiliac displacement of 5 mm in any plane
 Posterior fracture gap (rather than impaction)
 Avulsion of fifth lumbar transverse process, lateral border of
sacrum (sacrotuberous ligament), or ischial spine
(sacrospinous ligament)
Indications for Angiography
 Unexplained blood loss after stabilization
and aggressive resuscitation
 Pulselessness extremity
Surgical
 Stabilization with internal fixation of pelvis
 Stabilization of hemodynamic instability
with surgical packing of retroperitoneal
space
Associated Injuries
Other MSK
Long bone injuries
Knee injuries
Foot injuries
Abdominal
Urologic/Gyne
Neurological
Open Pelvic Injuries
 Colon, rectum, or perineum  Early diverting
colostomy
 Soft-tissue wounds  aggressively debrided
 Early repair of vaginal lacerations minimize
subsequent pelvic abscess
Colostomy is Indicated for Any
Open Injury Where the Fecal
Stream Will Contact the Open
Area
Urologic Injuries
 15% incidence
 Blood at meatus or high riding prostate
 Eventual swelling of scrotum and labia (occasional
arterial bleeder requiring surgery)
Urologic (cont.)
Retrograde urethrogram indicated in pelvic
injured patients but insure hemodynamic
stability or embolization may be difficult
due to dye extravasation
Urologic (cont.)
 Intra & extra peritoneal bladder ruptures
are repaired
 Foley preferred supra-pubic catheter
tunneled to prevent ant. wound
contamination
That’s A lot of Info!
Any Questions??
Thanks!