LHC beam operation past, present, future Mike Lamont for the LHC team 2011 – recap 75 ns 50 ns Squeeze further Increase number of bunches Scrubbing Increase bunch intensity Initial 11/3/2012 commissioning Reduce beam size from injectors LHC status.
Download ReportTranscript LHC beam operation past, present, future Mike Lamont for the LHC team 2011 – recap 75 ns 50 ns Squeeze further Increase number of bunches Scrubbing Increase bunch intensity Initial 11/3/2012 commissioning Reduce beam size from injectors LHC status.
LHC beam operation past, present, future Mike Lamont for the LHC team 2011 – recap 75 ns 50 ns Squeeze further Increase number of bunches Scrubbing Increase bunch intensity Initial 11/3/2012 commissioning Reduce beam size from injectors LHC status Starting out • Efficient commissioning leading into 75 ns operation • Intermediate energy run • Scrubbing rocky but successful – Dynamic effects: synchrotron radiation, e-cloud Scrubbing reduction of the LHC pressure Decision: go with 50 ns 11/3/2012 LHC status Number of bunches++ • End April: “fabulous performance” • A little bit of caution – extended period at 1092 bunches • Pushing 1.3e11 ppb but high beam intensity issues starting to show • • • • • • • • Blow-up of some bunches at injection E-cloud solenoids, triplet vacuum, beam screen cooling 108 b injection sort of OK, worry about scraping in the SPS Injection kicker heating, vacuum kicking off in IR 8 RF arc detectors – false dumps Abort gap population SEUs starting to show Collimator heating 11/3/2012 LHC status 1033 LHC machine breaks 3 new world records at 10h41 Sunday 29 May: 2 x 1092 bunches colliding, luminosity above 1.2 x 10^33, and a beam energy of 73 MJ. 11/3/2012 LHC status • • • • • • • • • • Looking towards 1380 bunches Strong emittance blow-up at injection • Chromaticity stability, persistent current decay compensation • Eventually suppressed by octupoles at 450 GeV Bunch length control in ramp Satellite collisions tested RF versus intensity versus trips – worrying about couplers – dump on cavity trip deployed Vacuum at 2&8 - instabilities Instrumentation issues UFO storms High losses at collimators 1 SEU dump per day Trim quad circuits tripping during squeeze 11/3/2012 LHC status 15th June: 1 fb-1 Summer - now what do we do? • July: starting to look encouraging… • August: getting so worried about SEUs we had a brainstorming Decision to push: • beam from the injectors • and a mini-Chamonix • squeeze 11/3/2012 LHC status Beam from injectors Excellent performance – years in the preparation Best in 2011 with 50 ns: • ~1.45 x 1011 ppb • ~2.3 microns into collision 11/3/2012 LHC status Design with 25 ns: • 1.15 x 1011 ppb • Normalized emittance 3.75 microns IR1 and IR5 aperture at 3.5 TeV 2011’s “platinum mine” ~3 cm We got 4-6 sigmas more than the expected 14 sigma Triplet aperture compatible with a well-aligned machine, a well centred orbit and a ~ design mechanical aperture (small tolerance) ~600 m 11/3/2012 LHC status Stefano Redaelli Squeeze • Beta* = 1 m – big success – 3.3e33 cm-2s-1 • Pushing bunch intensities to 1.35e11 • Collimator interlocks, PADs/MADs, injection quality, vacuum, collimator heating, Alice background, b2 instability, RF de-bunching, tune feedback in squeeze 11/3/2012 LHC status Impressive final run in Mirko Pojer 11/3/2012 LHC status Very positive ending Ion man 11/3/2012 LHC status 2011 • Another remarkable year • It was nearly always a battle… • Remarkably no real show stoppers • Successfully took on: – – – – – 11/3/2012 Total intensity Bunch spacing Bunch intensity Emittance Beta* & aperture LHC status Of note • Operational robustness – Precycle, injection, 450 GeV, ramp & squeeze & collisions • Machine protection – Unpinned by superb performance of machine protection and associated systems – Rigorous machine protection follow-up, qualification and monitoring (Post Mortem analysis, MPP, rMPP) • Routine collimation of 110 MJ LHC beams without a single quench from stored beams. 11/3/2012 LHC status Operation efficiency • Overall efficiency – Pretty good considering that this is the LHC – Overall time in stable beams 34% • Premature dumps – 50% of all STABLE BEAMS fills lasted less than 3 hours 34% 11/3/2012 LHC status Radiation to electronics (R2E) xMas-Mitigation crucial: patch, shielding, relocat. Patches to continue during 2012 Particular emphasis (analysis) of ‘new’ failures 11/3/2012 LHC status Concerted program of investigations, simulations, tests with beam … 11/3/2012 LHC status Tobias Baer Vacuum • Unexpected pressure rise (10-6 mbar) observed in LSS2-LSS8 (D1) and close to CMS: bad RF contact (x-rays inspection) interventions done in 2 & 8 & CMS to resolve RF finger issues - shouldn't be a problem in 2012. CMS LSS2 11/3/2012 LHC status TDI – beam screen heating 11/3/2012 LHC status 2011 to 2012 • Well organized, productive Xmas technical stop – Lot of R2E related work – Plus consolidation and improvements of many systems • Vacuum consolidation to address successfully diagnosed causes of instabilities in 2011 • Injection collimators issues diagnosed and understood spare in preparation - fingers crossed in the meantime • Cool-down of machine exactly on schedule - cryogenics demonstrating full mastery… • Very smooth hardware commissioning including careful quench-less commissioning of main circuits to 4 TeV • Machine checkout proceeding well - good for beam next Tuesday afternoon 11/3/2012 LHC status 2012 strategy 4 TeV β*=0.6m→0.7m→0.9m 50 ns ∫Ldt = 5 fb-1 in June? ∫Ldt = 15-19 LHCb ∫Ldt=1.5 fb-1 TCP gap=2.2mm fb-1 Dumps=30-50 Pile-Up=26-35 Lpeak=5-6.8 1033 cm-2s-1 SPS ε= 2 μm IP1 β*=500m SPS Np= 1.6 1011 p-Pb: 3.5 TeV or 4 TeV β*=(0.6,0.6,0.6,3)m 11/3/2012 LHC status ∫Ldt = 15- 23 nb-1 Rogelio Tomas Collimator settings 2012 2012: tight settings Collimation hierarchy has to be respected in order to achieve satisfactory protection and cleaning 11/3/2012 LHC status TCP 7 TCSG 7 TCLA 7 TCSG 6 TCDQ 6 TCT Aperture σ 4.3 6.3 8.3 7.1 7.6 9.0 10.5 How tight? Norway Iberian peninsula Intermediate settings (2011): ~3.1 mm gap at primary collimator 11/3/2012 Tight settings: ~2.2 mm gap at primary collimator LHC status 2012 run configuration • Energy – 4 TeV – Low number of quenches (as in 2011) assumed • Bunch spacing - 50 ns • Collimator settings – tight – As discussed – NB not yet proven operationally • Atlas and CMS beta* - 60 cm – with 70 cm and 90 cm as fallbacks • Alice and LHCb beta* - 3 m – Natural satellites versus main bunches in Alice 11/3/2012 LHC status Bunch spacing Performance from injectors Bunch spacing From Booster Protons per bunch (ppb) Emittance H&V [mm.mrad] 150 Single batch 1.1 x 1011 1.6 75 Single batch 1.2 x 1011 2.0 50 Single batch 1.45 x 1011 3.5 50 Double batch 1.6 x 1011 2.0 25 Double batch 1.2 x 1011 2.7 N kb f N kb f g L= F= F * 4ps xs y 4pen b 2 11/3/2012 2 LHC status 2012 LHC schedule Q1/Q2 1 2 3 4 11/3/2012 LHC status 2012 LHC schedule Q3/Q4 6 5 11/3/2012 High beta* runs for ALFA and TOTEM LHC status Van der Meer scans 2012 - breakdown Days 2 21 Machine check-out Commissioning with beam Machine development Technical stops Scrubbing (25 ns) 22 20 3 Technical stop recovery Initial intensity ramp-up Proton running 6 ~21 ~126 Special runs Ion setup ~8 4 Ion run 24 11/3/2012 LHC status ~150 days 50 ns performance estimate 4 TeV, 50 ns, 1380 bunches, 1.6e11, 2.5 microns 150 days of proton physics (assuming similar efficiencies to 2011) Beta* Collimators Peak Lumi [cm] [cm-2s-1] 90 Intermediate 5.1e33 70 Tight 6.2e33 60 Tight 6.8e33 11/3/2012 Int. Lumi [fb-1] 12.1 – 14.5 14.7 – 17.6 16.2 – 19.3 LHC status Pile-up Increase in peak 26 31 +22% 35 +10% 25 ns performance estimate 4 TeV, 25 ns, 1380 bunches, 1.6e11, 2.5 microns 140 days of proton physics (extra scrubbing required) Beta* [cm] Collimators Peak Lumi [cm-2s-1] Int. Lumi [fb-1] Pile-up 80 Tight 3.8e33 8.3 10 Conclusion: 25 ns not competitive with 50 ns 11/3/2012 LHC status 11/3/2012 LHC status Conclusions • Good performance in 2011 from working on all available parameters • Very definitely exploring the effects of high intensity beams – SEUs, beam induced heating, vacuum instabilities… – Operational efficiency suffering as a result • Main gain in 2012 is use of tight collimator settings and reduced beta* – 5 to 6 x 1033 cm-2s-1 and 15 fb-1 should be possible • Hope for improved operational efficiency – R2E mitigation measures – but partially countered by increased peak performance • Another long, interesting year in prospect… 11/3/2012 LHC status