Rhode Island Transition Indicator Rollout 3rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute May 12-14, 2009 Presentation Goals • Share how Rhode Island is publically reporting the SPP Transition.
Download ReportTranscript Rhode Island Transition Indicator Rollout 3rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute May 12-14, 2009 Presentation Goals • Share how Rhode Island is publically reporting the SPP Transition.
Rhode Island Transition Indicator Rollout 3rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute May 12-14, 2009 Presentation Goals • Share how Rhode Island is publically reporting the SPP Transition Indicator results • Share the policy implications for – State – District – Advocacy Partners • Discuss implications and strategies 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Rhode Island SPP Process • Indicators 1 & 2 Graduation & Dropout Rates – Cohort Formula – In second year (2007) of reporting by this method – Previously reported Special Education graduation/dropout rates from special education census 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Rhode Island SPP Process • Indicator 13 Transition Process – Did not use I-13 checklist – Collected data through special education census from IEP – Waited for full implementation based on the new state IEP form (July 1, 2008) – Focused on the qualitative inferences of Indicator 13 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Rhode Island SPP Process • Indicator 14 – Using census approach • Collected by districts – primarily student’s teacher • Web based survey – based on NPSO Stage 1 – In second year of reporting – First year reporting district level data – Response rate 51% • Representative for all groups except dropouts – 79% engagement rate 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • Statewide forums on SPP over the past few years • Include in monitoring visits • Included in Consolidated Resource Plan application – district’s federal funding application 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • Prepared a presentation with all Transition Indicators and shared with – Regional Transition Advisory Committees – Regional Special Education Director groups – Parent organizations – State Special Education Advisory Committee – Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors – State Transition Council 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • State Policy Implications • District Level Application Implications 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • State Level Policy - Indicators 1&2 – RI High School Regulations 2004 • Graduation by proficiency • Concern of increased dropout rate – No evidence • Dropout rate is down – Fifth year retention rate is up • Transition Academies • Interventions for reaching PBGR 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • District level implications – Are trends for state level date reflected in district level data? – Disproportionate representation for a district prompts state focus in Commissioner’s Review (HS Regulation monitoring system) – Provide plan to address in CRP application 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • State level policy – Indicator 13 – 95% compliance – Districts given names of students with non-compliant IEPs with 60 days to correct • Did not address “qualitative” components of Indicator 13 – – – – Coordinated Measurable Based on Assessments Reasonably Enable the student to reach the post school goals 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • New IEP will capture & state will collect: – Student Participation in IEP, if not, documentation of students preferences – Assessments used – Measurable post-school goals on the IEP – Transition Services – Student Assurance • □ Yes □ No I have been provided information about transition planning in the areas of education, training, employment and independent living. • □ Yes □ No I agree that my measurable post-school goals are based upon age appropriate transition assessments and will reasonably enable me to reach my goals after I complete my high school education. 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • District level implications – #1 be sure IEP is completed properly – #2 be sure census clerks alert the special education director when non-compliant IEP is discovered – Active participation in PD opportunities – ex. Transition Assessment forum – sold out! 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • State level policy – Indicator 14 – Focus on representativeness – Focus on results • Shared results in report – Used NPSO tools – Discussed state level conclusions – Prompted district level analysis 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • Looking at District Data – Begin by examining the “Total Reported” (last) column on the report. • Did your district collect a sufficient percentage to draw conclusions? • Was your percentage at or higher than the state average? • If not, you should examine your collection methodologies and develop improvements in the next round of data collection in April and May of 2009. – Examine the percentage of students engaged • Compare your district to the state data and districts with similar demographics. – Examine the numbers for students who are not engaged • This is of concern at the state level for particular demographic groups and holds particular implications at the local level. • Who these former students are and what lead to a non-engagement result? – Implications on Practice • The primary goal of the transition outcome data collection and reporting is to influence transition planning and program decisions at the local level. • Do the results point our team in directions to improve programming or services? • What has worked, what has not? • If we change particular practices would we expect to see a change in some or all of this data? 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute Transition Indicator Rollout • Going forward – Annual reporting on indicators to all groups – Built into the federal funding application – Built into public reporting – Built into monitoring system – Merging SPP data with state level policy discussions – ex. Dropout Prevention 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute David Sienko Rhode Island Department of Education 401-222-8987 [email protected] 11/7/2015 Secondary Transition Institute