Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 100 Introduction to Criminal Justice Dr.
Download ReportTranscript Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 100 Introduction to Criminal Justice Dr.
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 100 Introduction to Criminal Justice Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali CRIME AND VALUES DRUGS, GAMBLING AND SEX WORK Use/trafficking of illegal drugs has become a very controversial issue in the U.S. CJS DRUG ABUSE: sometimes beneficial, pharmaceuticals use it for reliving chronic pains, health issues some drugs made illegal 1790-1830: alcohol pervasive in U.S. Quakers: saw it as a problem but government did not take a moral stance on issue Government only intervened in taxing drugs and alcohol Farmers west of the Appalachians believed government had no right to do that DRUG CONTROL LEGISLATION More laws passed to protect people from harmful effects of drugs E.g. Pure Food and Drug Act: 1906 passed by Congress to clearly label what products contained But the Act did not criminalize drugs Harrison Act 1914 by Congress to collect tax from those who trafficked in drugs Then eventually U.S. moved towards criminalization of narcotics and other drugs 1951 Boggs Act: increased penalties for violating drug laws and regulated narcotics and marijuana in a single federal court Narcotics Control Act 1970: set forth the drug schedules currently used to classify drugs, and regulating drugs for tax purposes National Prohibition Act (Volstead Act) failed to completely prevent use of alcohol and provided opportunity for corruption and organized crime Prohibition ended 1933 1937 Treasury Dept’s Bureau of Narcotics considered marijuana to be a serious problem Marijuana Tax Act: referred to Marijuana as “devil drug,” “assassin of youth” and “weed of madness” Opium introduced by Chinese Marijuana by Mexicans, but when drugs moved to influences the middle and upper classes in society it received more attention, particularly in the 1960s…social movements WAR ON DRUGS: 1) testing children for drug use. Hypothesis: if drug use decreased, prices will decrease and less people will get involved 2) increases penalties for drug use/sales. Based on deterrence and legislation passed Drug forfeiture laws: police confiscating amount of cash, cars, other things a person owns……..any private possession used in drug trade will be confiscated DRUG TREATMENT: From a medical perspective Though it’s legal to possess and distribute certain drugs, it is not legal to be a drug addict Addiction: physical/psychological issue….dependency cycle TREATMENT PROGS SHOULD STRIVE FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1) making treatment user friendly, not treat individuals as criminals, according to social/emotional needs, helping rather than punishing 2) taking treatment seriously 3) linking treatment wit harm reductions: freeing someone from drugs should be a process not event 4) making aftercare a priority: counseling practices especially because of reintegration 5) linking treatment with work: rehabilitate them, good skills, etc… DECRIMINALIZATION AND LEGALIZATION DEBATE Some argue that the war on drugs has become serious problem to soc than drugs With time alcohol has been accepted as a moderate social risk Though we have laws to regulate its consumption, age restrictions, etc… COULD THE LEGISLATION OF DRUGS FOLLOW A STRUCTURE SIMILAR TO THAT OF ALCOHOL? Probably not because so many different types/kinds of drugs, and each would have to be considered for its harmful effects on society Also, legislation of drugs would probably be incremental and some would remain illegal SOME ISSUES IN REGARDS TO LEGISLATION OF DRUGS: 1) marijuana: chance of being legalized, least physically harmful and is useful as a medicine e.g. California/Arizona passes laws making it legal under doctor’s prescription for nausea associated with chemotherapy Also it would be difficult for government to control its production everywhere One way is to sell it and tax it as cigarettes 2) other drugs can be legalized with more stringent regulation e.g. heroin/cocaine medically given to people 3) drug legalization may reduce crime: Those under the influence may continue to commit crimes as a result of their intoxication No fights between sellers and buyers People would no longer steal to maintain drug habits 4) legal drugs may be more difficult for juveniles to obtain especially because JJS treats juveniles more leniently than the CJS. Obtaining marijuana easier than buying beer 5) respect for the law may be increased with legalization of drugs DECRIMINALIZATION: Would greatly reduce the penalties for drug use E.g. possession of small amount of marijuana is a misdemeanor in many jurisdictions, whereas selling larger amounts remains a felony Many consider it a waste of expensive resources to incarcerate an occasional Marijuana user who is better handled by fines, probation and community service THE POLICE AND DRUGS: Until policies change, police will always be required to deal with laws and realities that shape contemporary drug scene Police will always have goals to accomplish controlling illegal drugs 1) dealing with street level crimes, gang assoc activities 2) controlling crimes of drug users 3) addressing health, economic, social well-being of drug users 4) Restoring quality of life in urban communities by ending street level dealing 5) Providing programs to help keep juveniles from getting involved with drugs 6) Dealing with problems inherent with large amount of money in illegal trades, police corruption and integrity of CJS GAMBLING: Ambivalent attitudes toward gambling In some regard, it is considered consensual and a victimless activity However, others in society question its economic, moral and social ramifications Gambling legalized across country, while state and local governments tried to capitalize on public’s desire to risk a little to gain a lot, though the odds are against them From CJ perspective, look at gambling as an activity with social problems First it was confined to Nevada and NJ and now almost everywhere Government sponsored lotteries, to raise money From CJ perspective, legalized gambling has double edged sword 1) government regulated gambling, with standards of fairness and honesty in administration of games (organized activity) 2) also moved from behind scenes to well lit, physically secured places, comfortable, to convenient stores and internet Now it has its own lifestyle, where people gamble while on vacation and for pleasure/fun BUT IT’S ALSO PROBLEMATIC BECAUSE IT REQUIRES INCREASED LEVELS OF ATTENTION/SECURITY FROM CJ AGENCIES. EVEN IF IN LIT PLACES, SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT MAY BE DANGEROUS AND RISKY Robert Goodman’s The Luck Business: The Devastating Consequences and Broken Promises of America’s Gambling Explosion argues that neighborhoods where casinos located have negative effects in terms of property values, urban decay. Also with casinos we see pawn shops, bars, and others that drive stable communities out Also people become addicted to gambling, cannot pay bills, taxes, etc… fall in debt Divert to stealing, embezzlement, drug dealing to support habit Also some commit suicide 5 to 10 times likely compared to others in society Problem: internet allowed for more access. Efforts are being made to pass laws to legislations to prohibit internet gambling UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING FUNDING PROHIBITION ACT: illegal for credit card companies and other financial institutions to cooperate with offshore gambling sites e.g. Bank of America, Chase and others prohibit use of their services for betting online This technology in gambling makes it even more challenging for LE officials to control So now CJ shifted towards making sure that government collects taxes form gambling economy vs. moral aspect of harmful acts Problems is that we keep advertising for it SEX WORK: How does/should the CJS respond to regulating sexuality Some people argue that government should not intervene in people’s personal lives, but CJS must respond to sexual problems thought to be of concern Especially when sex is used as commodity and bought and sold 1) PROSTITUTION Engaging in sexual activity for money Illegal in almost all jurisdictions except Nevada…state licensed Since its consensual, then there is no victim Most arrests made by police officers are when PO actually pose as customers or prostitutes PROSTITUTION ON HIERARCHY 1) Call girls or male escort: top of hierarchy Work for escort service High fees Can screen clients Sometimes besides sex, then can go to dinner, etc.. 2) Strippers and exotic dancers: Not all are prostitutes Choose their customers Arrange with management of bar to solicit customers for money 3) House girls: Work in brothels Run by madam and girls get % of fee Madam screens clients Disadvantage: not being able to select customers and being told when to work, etc… 4) Street walkers Solicit customers on street corners, bars, etc… Least payment because cannot be very selective Often controlled by pimps Continually arrested High risk of STDs, physical violence and abuse from pimps TODAY WE EVEN HAVE LOWER LEVEL OF PROSTITUTES WORK IN CRACK HOUSES AND TRADES SEX FOR DRUGS Promiscuous in choosing sex partners Not careful about safe sex Likely to be raped because increased intoxication levels SOME PEOPLE CONSIDER THAT EXCHANGE OF SEX FOR MONEY IS MORALLY WRONG, BUT OTHERS SEEM TO BE MORE ACCEPTABLE TO THE IDEA Many times sex/prostitution has become referred to as “sex tourism” where travel agencies sponsoring tours to impoverished countries THESE WHO ADVOCATE LEGALIZATION OR DECRIMINALIZATION OF PROSTITUTION SUGGEST THE FOLLOWING: 1) women would have control over their sexuality (can work from home without being arrested) 2) customers would be able to find sex without worrying for their physical safety. Don’t have to go to unsafe places 3) prostitutes could be licensed and checked for STDs 4) government would collect taxes form legal prostitution and use money to address issues brought about by prostitution 5) profession would be destigmatized WHAT SHOULD WE DO? 5) Strippers and Exotic dancer Sometimes do not engage in prostitution. Get man’s money (drunk) without even touching him “counterfeit intimacy” PORNOGRAPHY: Two main issues that make it problematic 1) those who think that pictures or descriptions of nakedness and sexual activity to be immoral considered vulgar 2) link between sex and violence for home, humiliation of women is stimulating. Seeing other people suffer DIFFERENT TYPES OF “P” Violent P Non-violent but dehumanizing P Erotica (material non sexist and non-violence) BUT HOW DO WE define “P” and where do we draw the line? “community standards” ISSUES THAT CJS FACES IN TERMS OF SELLING SEX 1) stores that sell sex: magazines 2) pornography and the mail: L.E. cannot supervise deliveries to people’s homes, federal government uses U.S. postal service to control some “P” and people can be arrested, fined 3) internet and sex: challenge to CJ and L.E. officials, so how do we combat this problem HOW DO WE HAVE MORE “SOCIAL CONTROL” ON THESE PROBLEMS/MORAL ISSUES WE HAVE IN SOCIETY, IF AT ALL WE THINK THAT THEY ARE IN FACT PROBLEMS?