Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County and 2010 Elections By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
Download ReportTranscript Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County and 2010 Elections By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County and 2010 Elections By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College March 30, 2011 Topics 1. Recent CSLI survey results – March 7-10 2. Election results from 2010 – affecting Anne Arundel County Overview of Survey Process •CSLI – Part of Sarbanes Center for Public and Community Service at Anne Arundel Community College •Operating since 1978 •Mission: Provide students opportunities for engaged learning, community outreach • Main activity – public interest surveys oRespondents randomly chosen from universe of listed telephone numbers combined with computer generated numbers oTypical sample size: 400-900 respondents; students used as interviewers o Topics – wide ranging, economy, transportation, land use/growth, taxes/spending, schools… • Last • since 1978 survey – March 7-10, 2011 – focus on this presentation • www2.aacc.edu/csli Polling Results for AA County Remarkable stability in right/wrong direction… 70 66 62 60 60 58 57 61 62 58 58 55 54 53 51 50 57 55 51 52 51 50 52 52 52 49 47 50 40 Right 34 33 31 30 27 23 20 20 19 25 24 26 23 20 17 15 14 19 13 10 27 24 21 18 19 15 25 29 18 15 16 29 26 18 20 32 Wrong 31 28 25 27 21 27 21 16 17 28 28 28 23 22 20 17 12 0 Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp Fa Sp '99 '99 '00 '00 '01 '01 '02 '02 '03 '03 '04 '04 '05 '05 '06 '06 '07 '07 '08 '08 '09 '09 '10 '10 '11 Unsure AA County Polling Results: Most Important Problem - Fall '04 to Spring '11 Economy – top concern with no recent changes 60 50 48 40 38 36 33 30 8 7 16 16 12 7 22 12 8 7 11 12 9 9 5 5 5 Fall '10 Spring '10 Fall '09 Spring '09 Fall '08 Spring '08 Fall '07 Spring '07 Fall '06 Spring '06 Fall '05 Spring '05 Fall '04 4 2 0 Economy /Housing Taxes – too high Growth /development Education / Traffic congestion /problems Crime / drugs Mean 16 15 14 10 23 21 18 36 Sp '11 22 20 36 AA County Polling Results: Rate the Economy Percentage saying “excellent” or “good” also stable since March 2009 60 Anne Arundel County 50 46 49 48 44 45 Maryland improves by 8% 40 35 30 30 31 32 27 USA 20 11 10 5 0 11 11 11 AA County compared to USA – County looks around 35% better 80 74 76 74 74 71 74 71 71 70 69 CSLI – Anne Arundel County 62 60 56 56 55 49 50 46 48 44 42 38 40 34 38 30 49 45 34 31 26 32 28 27 27 22 17 20 Gallup – National Polling for USA 10 10 5 11 11 13 5 0 S'02 F '02 S '03 F '03 S '04 F '04 S '05 F '05 S '06 F '06 S '07 F '07 S '08 F '08 S '09 F '09 S '10 F '10 S '11 AA County Polling Results: Mostly stable findings in % saying a condition ‘applies’ Economic Conditions - % saying 'applies' - specific items 80 71 70 75 Little change except for fewer losses in stocks/retirement accounts 70 56 60 60 52 51 50 46 47 44 47 40 35 30 29 30 24 24 20 11 15 19 33 32 34 35 21 20 6 10 4 6 8 7 7 9 0 Facing the possibility of Significant losses in your Facing the possibility of Delay in making a major Health care insurance is unemployment stock or retirement house foreclosure or loss purchase such as a home accounts S '08 or car F '08 S '09 F '09 S '10 F '10 S '11 unavailable, too expensive or inadequate The economy: what else applies? 70 Big jump in transportation costs 63 59 60 56 63 61 58 59 59 55 55 56 56 63 60 53 50 50 44 43 42 41 40 46 40 32 30 24 21 21 20 13 11 12 21 17 15 14 10 10 0 Unable to find affordable housing Wages or salaries are not rising as fast as the cost of living S '08 F '08 Hard to afford the cost of Hard to afford the cost of transportation utilities such as electricity or gas S '09 F '09 S '10 F '10 S '11 Taxes are too high in relation to government services provided Biggest Economic Challenge Facing the County – Items Mentioned in 2005 and 2011 Condition Budget and jobs rise Fall in importance 2005 Balancing the county budget (less spending, more revenues) Providing enough jobs Providing enough skills/training or otherwise improving education/schools Managing growth/development Having enough infrastructure, roads, transportation All other answers Total Spring 2011 0 18 8 11 16 12 27 3 51 100 8 7 39 100 Perceptions of Decreases in Government Services Most don’t see an impact from govt. belt-tightening Services mentioned Answer Yes No Don’t know, no answer Total Percentage 26 70 5 101 Cases Percentage Roads 39 24 Schools/teachers 31 19 Library 24 15 College tuition 12 7 Fire 10 6 Seniors services Jobs/furloughs/pay cuts Police 10 6 9 6 Staffing 7 4 Child services 6 4 MVA 3 2 Mental health 2 1 163 100 Total 10 6 State and County Issues Issue Support Oppose Unsure Imposing an additional fine of up to $1500 on drivers caught drunk driving 86 13 1 Permitting the use of off-shore wind power near Ocean City 80 10 10 Increasing the alcohol tax Permitting the purchase of marijuana for medical purposes 68 65 29 29 3 7 Taking away drivers’ licenses from those who refuse to pay taxes 64 32 3 Increasing the use of cameras to ticket those running red lights 59 41 4 Making same sex marriages legal in Maryland 47 46 7 Making preparations to implement President Obama’s health care reform law 43 50 8 Limiting the use of binding arbitration when the county negotiates with public safety unions 35 42 23 Allowing the children of illegal immigrants to pay in-state tuition for college 33 63 4 Increasing university tuition to maintain the quality of higher education 32 66 2 Reducing the pension and retiree health benefits of state workers 28 65 7 Promising state workers no furlough days, and providing them with a $750 bonus 25 59 16 Increasing the county income tax to the maximum allowed by law to avoid cuts in essential services 25 68 7 17 12 80 3 Increasing the gasoline tax to bolster the transportation trust fund Social Category Party p=.01 Democrat Unaffiliated Republican Ideology p=.01 Liberal Moderate Conservative Religion p=.01 None/Non-practicing Jewish Spiritual but not part of organized religion Other Catholic Protestant Some other Christian Evangelical Marital Status p=01. Single Married Gender p=.3 Female Male Support % 57 48 35 81 53 22 75 71 64 46 43 40 38 30 66 45 51 44 Demographics/Same Sex Marriage % saying “Support” Age p=.07 18-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61+ Race Black 53 51 51 53 37 p=.3 White Other (including Hispanic, Asian and unspecified ‘other’) 30 49 50 Watched, listened or read about… Yes No Total 28 Unsure /N.A. 1 President Obama’s state of the union speech? 72 Governor O’Malley’s inaugural speech or his state of the state speech 41 58 1 100 Watched County Council hearings being broadcast on local cable stations anytime over the last year? 19 80 1 100 101 Estimations of Federal Budget 51% estimated Estimates Under $1 billion $1 billion to $500 billion $501 to $999 billion $1-1.999 trillion $2-2.99 trillion $3-4.99 trillion $5-6 trillion Over $6 trillion Total % 4 17 4 21 10 22 6 17 101 Estimations of State Budget 31% estimated Estimates % Under $1 billion $1-5.99 billion $6 to $10.99 billion $11-15.99 billion $16-20.99 billion $21-30.99 billion $31-40 billion Over $40 billion Total 30 26 7 4 5 3 1 24 100 Estimations of County Budget 31% estimated Estimates Under $5 million $5-50 million $51 to $100 million $101-350 million $351-650 million $651-999 million $1-1.99 billion $2-2.99 billion $4-6.99 billion Over $7 billion Total % 22 18 10 8 9 7 14 3 4 6 100 Presidential Job Approval: Recent Rise… 70 61 53 60 50 40 39 37 35 32 34 33 30 30 28 43 54 47 47 47 42 25 24 20 10 0 Spring '11 Fall '10 Gallup Spring '10 Fall '09 Spring '09 Fall '08 Spring '08 Fall '07 Spring '07 Fall '06 CSLI Presidential Job Approval: % approving of president’s job by party 90 79 80 72 62 57 60 70 69 70 53 53 50 43 47 53 47 20 10 57 52 47 42 Democrats 35 40 30 Overall 28 19 24 24 9 25 24 25 18 17 Republicans 6 Indep 0 Sp. '08 Fa. '08 Bush Sp '09 Fa. '09 Sp '10 Obama Fa '10 Sp '10 2010 Elections Statewide Races – AAC Results ‘06/’10 100 100 90 80 Mikulski improves Very little change in Governor or Comptroller outcomes 70 60 50 56.7 54.4 51 50.4 49 49.6 43.3 43.4 51.5 54.3 52.3 47.7 45.7 48.5 40 30 20 10 0 0 Govr Comptroller Atty Gen. U.S. Senate Gubernatorial Races – Anne Arundel County Anne Arundel Consistently supports Rep. Gubernatorial Candidates Dem – Rep Vote for Governor Schaeffer 83% Mooney 17% O’Malley on low end of typical Dem vote deficit 66972 Glendening 40% Sauerbrey 60% O’Malley 42% Ehrlich 57% Glendening 43% Sauerbrey 57% KK Townsend 35% Ehrlich 65% Schaeffer 49% Shepard 51% -28743 -20788 -27581 -21963 -2254 1986 1990 60000 40000 O’Malley 43% Ehrlich 54% -53215 80000 20000 0 -20000 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 -40000 -60000 Statewide Races: O’Malley vs. Ehrlich for Governor 2006-2010 Polls are in range, but with internal variation Nov. 2006 March 2010 October 11-14, 2010 Oct. 26-27 Nov. 2 All Categories Exclude some All categories Exclude some Exclude all except voters Exit Poll Actual Vote 42 35 43 29 32 42 46 43 Ehrlich 56.9 47 57 40 45 59 51 54 Gap 14.9 12 14 11 13 19 5 11 Other -- 3 -- 2 -- -- 3 -- Undecided -- -- -- 22 24 -- -- -- Neither -- 5 -- 1 -- -- -- -- Unsure -- 10 -- 5 -- -- -- -- 100 100 99 101 101 100 Candidate O’Malley Total Actual Vote State Senate in AAC (Districts 30,31,32,33) 100% 100% 90% Dems experience lower percentages in all districts 80% 70% 62% 60% 50% 40% 54% 51% 49% 46% 62% 60% 55% Dem 2006 50%50% Rep 2006 45% 38% 38% Dem 2010 40% Rep 2010 30% 20% 10% 0% 0% STATE SENATOR 30 STATE SENATOR 31 STATE SENATOR 32 STATE SENATOR 33 Delegate Races in Districts 30,31,32,33: Dem-Rep Gap 15000 Loses in 32 – what’s the future for Dems there? Big Dem loss in 31 10000 5000 10983 8825 4982 33b uncontested 33a only 1 Dem cand. 0 -5000 30 -3567 31 -3341 32 33a -5038 33b -2164 -10000 -15000 -20000 -25000 -14492 Race gets very close in 30 Dem-Rep 2006 -27514 -30000 -35000 -32511 Dem-Rep 2010 Senate and Delegate Minimum Winning Totals in Districts 30,31,32,33 Minimum winning vote Seats District Senate Delegates Senate Delegate 30 25253 22535 Dem D=1/R=2 31 25723 22436 Rep D=0/R=3 32 24762 18786 Dem D=3/R=0 43466 uncontested 18603 Rep D=0/R=2 33(a) 33b 14623 D=0/R=1 District 31: State Senate Races: 2006-2010 2006: Walter Shandrowski 49.1% Brian Simonaire 50.8% 2010: Ned Carey 37.8% Brian Simonaire 62.1% District 31 – 2006 vs. 2010 Delegate Races Candidate 2010: % Votes Candidate 2006: % Chiappelli 11.8 12943 Cadden 17.0 17529 -4586 Towles 10.9 11968 Fleckenstein 16.1 16651 -4683 Ekert 10.8 11856 Reynolds 14.0 14452 -2596 Total 11.2 36767 15.7 48632 -11865 Democratic candidates can’t replicate 2006 results! Votes District 31: Demographic Info Too many conservatives, not enough moderates District 31: Issues and Conditions Economic distress is high 90 83 80 70 63 56 60 50 47 46 43 53 51 46 41 40 30 56 36 35 35 34 27 42 26 20 20 21 19 14 9 10 0 District 3 County 18 16 6 County Elections: Slots at Arundel Mills Opponents to the introduction of slot machines at Arundel Mills Mall are circulating a petition to put the county council’s decision to grant zoning needed for slots to referendum in November, potentially reversing the decision. Do you support or oppose this petition effort? Position What happened to shift voter sentiment at last minute? Will you be voting for or against Question A on the November ballot? A "for" vote would approve the County Council's zoning decision permitting slots in the county, including at Arundel Mills and Laurel. An 'against' vote would leave the county without slots zoning at any location. Oct. ‘10 Exit Poll Actual Vote Support March ’10 45 42 60 55.6 Oppose 45 42 39 44.4 Gap 0 0 21 11.2 Unsure 7 16 -- -- No answer 2 -- 1 -- Total 99 100 100 100 Question A: Election Day vs. Early Voting by Council District Early voting a good predictor of election day votes 70.0% 65.0% 61.3% 59.5% 60.0% 54.5% 54.1% 54.8% 54.8% 52.0% 51.1% 50.0% 47.3% SPark Lib Harundale Lib 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 56.5% 55.9% Annap Senior Ctr Edgewater Lib Quest A West County Lib Early voted at West County Early Votes 10.0% 0.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 100000 87676 90000 70000 50000 89456 89613 80000 60000 97465 93533 63879 85040 83305 57615 54899 Rep Dem 40000 Other 30000 20000 10000 10486 0 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 12425 GAP 2716 23987 3920 6151 Including Shay Only a few thousand votes separate Dem/Rep candidates 1930 2010 County Exec Race Over Time Nov. 2006 Candidate Actual Vote June Sept. 2010 2010 Online Online Poll Poll October 11-14, 2010 Oct. 26-27 Nov. 2 All Categories All Categories All categories Exclude some Exclude all except voters Exit Poll Actual Vote Johnson/ Conti 49 30 (Owens) 23 (Conti) 28 21 24 37 39 44.0 Leopold 51 52/54 54 34 38 59 50 50.5 Gap 2 22/31 26 13 14 22 11 6.5 Other -- 15/16 10 2 3 -- -- 5.4 Undecided -- -- -- 32 35 -- -- -- Neither -- 4/7 9 2 -- -- 3 -- Unsure -- -- -- 10 -- -- -- -- 101 100 101 100 Total 101/100 100 Unlike Governor’s race, CE race much harder to predict –much tightening at the end… Vote Composition: Exit Poll Conti lags among Dem voters but gains a bit among unaffiliated 100 90 84 80 89 72 70 57 60 50 51 48 44 43 Conti 39 40 O'Malley Weathersbee 30 20 12 10 15 9 0 Overall Dem Rep Unaffil. Voter Composition continued: Exit Poll Conti lags among Dems, but gains among Reps 120 9596 100 83 81 83 75 80 64 Conti 60 O'Malley 50 Weathersbee 40 40 31 29 21 13 20 19 12 4 0 4 0 Strg Dem Weak Dem Ind Dem Ind Rep Weak Rep Strg Rep Vote by Ideology Conti lags among liberals but does a bit 100 better with conservatives 94 90 80 94 85 87 82 79 70 60 59 54 50 Leopold 52 41 40 Conti 40 O'Malley 42 Ehrlich Weathersbee 30 20 10 16 10 10 6 13 6 0 Liberal Moderate Conservative Grannon County Exec.: How informed were voters? 80 70 76 Leopold voters started and remained more informed 60 Oct. 11-14 Voters seem informed by election EXIT POLL Oct. 11-14 56 56 NOT VERY Informed 53 EXIT POLL 50 43 40 42 Conti Oct. 11-14 Leopold 35 Undecided 31 28 30 27 24 20 10 9 VERY Informed EXIT POLL 16 SOMEWHAT Informed 5 0 0 0 0 0 County executive choice: Whose stands do you favor? Sorted by Undecided/Don’t know (Oct. 11-14) On this issue are you more favorable to Conti, Leopold or Shay? Issue Conti Leopold L-C Shay Undecided Don’t know enough Undec.+ don’t know enough Allowing slots at Arundel Mills mall 10 17 7 1 27 46 73 Improving transportation 13 20 7 1 21 45 66 Protecting the needs of vulnerable populations in the county budget Maintaining high ethical standards 16 18 2 1 21 44 17 17 0 3 24 39 63 Improving public schools 13 24 11 1 19 43 62 Keeping neighborhoods safe 13 24 11 1 21 41 62 Making County government more efficient Preserving the environment 12 29 17 2 21 37 15 21 6 7 18 39 57 Managing growth 13 29 16 2 18 38 56 Having the right experience for the job 11 32 21 1 21 35 56 Keeping taxes low 14 30 16 1 19 36 55 Encouraging economic development 13 31 18 1 18 37 55 65 58 County executive choice: Whose stands do you favor? Sorted by those favoring Leopold over Conti (Oct. 11-14) U Conti Leopold L-C Shay Undecided Don’t know enough 11 32 21 1 21 35 56 13 31 18 1 18 37 55 12 29 17 2 21 37 58 13 29 16 2 18 38 56 Keeping taxes low 14 30 16 1 19 36 55 Improving public schools 13 24 11 1 19 43 62 Keeping neighborhoods safe 13 24 11 1 21 41 62 Allowing slots at Arundel Mills mall 10 17 7 1 27 46 73 Improving transportation Preserving the environment 13 15 20 21 7 6 1 7 21 18 45 39 66 57 Protecting the needs of vulnerable populations in the county budget 16 18 2 1 21 44 65 Maintaining high ethical standards 17 17 0 3 24 39 63 Having the right experience for the job Encouraging economic development Making County government more efficient Managing growth Undecided/Don’t know enough Issue Stands/Traits Most Shaping Choice for County Exec. (Exit Poll) Issue/trait Overall Conti Leopold L-C Balance budget 30 21 44 23 Taxes 21 10 34 24 Right experience 22 15 32 17 14 7 23 16 16 11 24 13 33 31 43 12 Crime 14 9 20 11 Growth/devel. 15 12 18 6 Familiar name 4 1 7 6 Slots 10 8 12 4 Constituent serv. 9 8 11 3 Environment 15 17 11 -6 21 26 19 -7 13 21 8 -13 16 24 9 -15 28 38 22 -16 Leopold Cost of living bets on experience Strong leader and issues Economy Conti betsSchools Honesty on character Right moral outlook and party Party affiliation Weathersbee vs. Bateman Council District Weathersbee Weathersbee Weathersbee ‘06 ‘10 1 57.3 55.3 48.8 58.2 49.2 62.0 51.8 54.3 52.8 43.6 56.4 46.7 58.6 45.7 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total ‘10-’06 Bateman ‘10 W-B -3 -2.5 -5.2 -1.8 -2.5 -3.4 -6.1 60.4 59.8 55.5 61.9 55.1 61.5 50.7 -6.1 -7.0 -11.9 -5.5 -8.4 -2.9 -5.0 57.8 (up from 54.7 51.2 Weathersbee has losses in districts 3 and 7 in 2010 and no gains in any district -3.5 54% in ‘06) -6.7 Bateman increases votes from ‘06 and wins majority in all districts in 2010 Council Districts Party Registration 53%D, 29%R, 18%U 49%D, 32%R, 18%U 48%D, 31%R, 18%U 42%D, 39%R, 19%U 37%D, 44%R, 20%U 47%D, 31%R, 18%U 36% D, 41%R, 19%U Democratic Candidates by Council District 37.6% 36.4% 39.9% 39.8% CC7 Conti underperforms in district 6 43.8% 46.1% CC6 48.1% 36.6% 36.0% 38.7% 37.1% CC5 53.1% 51.7% 35.7% 59.5% Obama 57.1% Benoit and Trumbauer exceed Dem registration Meaningless party reg. in district 3 Klosterman underperforms in district 2 51.7% 52.5% CC1 0.0% 41.7% 41.0% 48.1% 45.5% 46.2% 42.8% 48.5% CC2 Conti Omalley 53.8% 51.9% 35.0% DemCC 42.8% CC4 30.8% 58.0% Rudolph about average in district 5 47.1% CC3 PartyReg 47.4% 45.8% 49.2% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% Majority Dem registration in D1 60.0% 70.0% Legislative Districts Questions to ponder: • 1. Can Democrats be successful countywide and in ‘harder’ districts? o Bateman, Weathersbee • Quality of candidate • Quality of opponent • Quality of campaign • Impact of larger trends – national, statewide • Changes in the composition of the electorate • Saliency of issues Questions to ponder: • 2. What is the future of District 31 Democratic seats o Democrats demoralized? o Will the 2010 results undermine recruitment efforts? o What issues can Democrats successfully use in the district? o What vulnerabilities do Democrats have – on issues, in the composition of the electorate, in the recruitment of candidates? Questions to ponder: • As chair of the AAC Dem Central Committee… o Identify potential candidates, groom them early o Identify key issues within each district o Identify how changes in the composition of the electorate might affect Dem candidates o Provide experience based campaign training o Conduct opposition research – identify Republican vulnerabilities, develop key talking points, test ideas on focus groups, conduct polls o Develop consistent outreach tools - a Democratic newsletter – online distribution, central location for all Dem events, solicit input from voters o Ensure turnout – close elections imply narrow victories! National Politics: Exit Poll re: House Vote Demographics of National House of Representatives Vote (vs. ‘08 Obama – National Exit Polls • Party identification in 2010: Dem/Rep at 35%, 29% Ind. (vs. 39/32/29% in 2008) • Defection slightly higher among Dems 7% vs 5% Reps • Indep. vote sided strongly with Reps 56% not Dems 37% (vs. 41/52% in ‘08) • Women equally split (48 D; 49% R) (vs. 56, 43% in 2008) • Whites strongly Rep (60%) not Dem (37%) (vs. 55, 43% in 2008) • Only those with little (57%) or postgrad ed (53%) favored Dems National Politics: Exit Poll re: House Vote Demographics of National House of Representatives Vote (vs. ‘08 Obama – National Exit Polls Vote by Age (08/10) Dem ’08 Dem ‘10 Rep 18-29 18/12 66 55 42 30-44 29/24 52 46 50 45-64 37/43 50 45 53 45 38 59 65 and Older 16/21 Older voters worried about Medicare/Health care reform? National Politics: House Vote • Libs and Moderates favored Dems (90, 55%) but were too small (20, 38%) a part of electorate vs Cons. (42%) who massively favored Reps (84) (2008: Lib 22; Moderate 44; Cons. 34%) • Lost job – no effect(30%)? Yes (50 Dem; 46% Rep) No (45, 54%) • Union member (17%): Yes (61 Dem; 37% Rep) No (43, 54%) • 2008 Presidential Vote: Obama (45%) 84,14%; McCain (45%) 7,91%, Other (4%) 33, 58% • Is vote support for Obama? Yes (23%) 96 Dem; 3% Rep; No (37%) 6, 92%, Not factor (38%), 52, 44% National Politics: House Vote Too many people strongly disapprove of the job Congress is doing… How Congress is Handling its Job Democrat Republican Strongly Approve (4%) 82 16 Somewhat Approve (20%) 78 20 Somewhat Disapprove (26%) 57 41 Strongly Disapprove (48%) 19 77 But unfavorable opinions are spread to both Dems and Reps What is your opinion of… Democrats - favorable (44%) Republicans - favorable (41%) Democrat Republican 91 8 11 88 National Politics: House Vote Govt. perceived as over-reaching… Govt should do more ? Yes, do more (38%) vs 51% in ’08 No, do less (56%) vs. 43% in ‘08 Dem Rep 77 20 21 76 With too many dissatisfied with federal govt. Opinion of Federal Government Democrat Republican Enthusiastic (3%) 92 6 Satisfied (21%) 79 18 Dissatisfied (48%) 41 55 Angry (25%) 14 83 National Politics: House Vote Economic anxieties favor Reps.. How worried about economic conds.? Dem Rep 30 68 Somewhat Worried (37%) 52 43 Not Too Worried (10%) 81 18 Very Worried (49%) Reversal of 2008 when those worried lined up behind Dems Worried That Economic Crisis Will Hurt Your Family Very Worried (48%) Somewhat Worried (33%) Dem Rep 62 52 36 47 Not Too Worried (13%) 33 63 Not Worried At All (5%) 40 56 National Politics: House Vote Stimulus not perceived as having done enough… Stimulus Policy has Helped (32%) Hurt (34%) Made No Difference (31%) Dem Rep 86 10 13 87 39 57 While blaming Wall Street or Bush just wasn’t enough… Who Do You Blame for Economic Problems? Dem Rep Wall Street (35%) George W. Bush (29%) 41 83 57 15 Barack Obama (24%) 6 91 National Politics: House Vote Health care reform was polarizing and insufficiently popular What Should Congress Do With New Health Care Law? Dem Rep Expand It (31%) 84 15 Leave It As Is (16%) 63 34 11 86 Repeal It (48%) And probably viewed as a distraction from the prime concerns of most citizens… Most Important Issue Facing Country Today Economy (63%) Health Care (18%) Illegal Immigration (8% War in Afghanistan (7%) Democrat Republican 43 51 26 58 54 47 68 40 National Politics: House Vote Now policy direction lacks consensus…and is polarizing Bush-Era Tax Cuts Should Be Continued For... All Americans (40%) Families Under $250,000 (36%) Dem Rep 14 64 84 32 75 22 Dem Rep (40%) 26 32 71 65 Spending to Create Jobs (37%) 68 30 No One (15%) Highest Priority for Next Congress Cutting Taxes (18%) Reducing Deficit Republicans face contradictory pressures – reduce deficit vs. cutting taxes National Politics: House Vote Dems disapprove of war in Afghanistan – losing the base? U.S. War in Afghanistan Approve (40%) Disapprove (54%) Should Same-Sex Marriages Be Legally Recognized? Yes (41%) No (53%) Dem Rep 24 61 75 36 Dem Rep 67 27 30 70 While same sex marriage still troubled waters for Dems Democratic Candidates by Council District Districts 4 and 6 overperform Obama OMalley Conti DemCC Mean Party Reg Mean-Reg. CC1 49.2 45.8 47.4 52.5 48.7 51.7 -3 CC2 48.5 42.8 46.2 45.5 45.7 48.1 -2.4 CC3 35.7 30.8 35 41 35.6 41.7 -6.1 CC4 57.1 51.9 53.8 59.5 55.6 47.1 8.5 CC5 42.8 37.1 38.7 36 38.6 36.6 2.1 CC6 58 51.7 48.1 53.1 52.7 46.1 6.6 CC7 43.8 39.8 39.9 36.4 40 37.6 2.4 District 3 underperforms!