Transcript The aim is 1. showing where the discrepancies between national and international data; 2.

The aim is
1. showing where the discrepancies between national and
international data;
2. explain the reasons for these discrepancies
Goal 5: Improve maternal health
Target 5b: Achieve, by 2015, universal access to reproductive
health
5.3 Contraceptive prevalence rate
5.4 Adolescent birth rate
5.5 Antenatal care coverage (at least one visit and at least
four visits)
5.6 Unmet need for family planning
Possible Reasons:
-Data sources
- Methodology
5.3 Contraceptive prevalence rate
Comparison of national and international data
National data
Year Data Data source
1999
2000
2005
2007
2008
67.5 71.6
65.6
66.7
RHS
MICS2
MICS3
DHS
Data available at UN Population
Division
Data sources Estimates
Year
RHS
MICS2
MICS3
DHS
67.5
71.6
65.6
66.7
1999
2005
2007
2008
Data sources:
1. RHS - Reproductive Health Survey 1999:
The Kiev International Institute of Sociology (KIIS)
The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Reproductive Health (CDC)
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
The Ukraine Ministry of Health
2. MICS2 (3) - Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey of women's and children's 2000, 2005:
The State Statistics Committee of Ukraine (SSCU)
The UN International Children's Fund (UNICEF)
3. DHS - Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2007
The Ukrainian Center for Social Reforms
The State Statistical Committee of Ukraine.
Macro International Inc. provided technical assistance through the MEASURE DHS project
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
5.3 Contraceptive prevalence rate
Methodology
RHS 1999
Women aged 15-44 in
registered or unregistered
marriages were currently
using contraceptive
methods at the time of
interview.
MICS2 (3)
2000, 2005
DHS 2007
Percentage of married or
in union women aged 1549 who are using (or
whose partner is using) a
contraceptive method.
Current use of contraception is defined as the
proportion of women aged 15-49 who
reported the use of a family planning method
at the time of interview. The percent
distribution of all women, currently married
women, and sexually active unmarried
women who are currently using specific family
planning methods by age.
Definition used by international agency for MDG
Percentage of women married or in-union aged 15 to 49 who are currently using, or whose
sexual partner is using, at least one method of contraception, regardless of the method
used.
5.6 Unmet need for family planning
Year
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Comparison of national and international data
Data available at UN
National data
Population Division
Data Data source
Data sources Data
Year
RHS 17.5 1999
14.9 RHS
2000
correct:
2001
14.9
2002
Tabl.
?
7.15
2003
2004
2005
11.5 MICS3
2006
DHS 10.3 2007
10.3
5.6 Unmet need for family planning
Methodology
RHS 1999
Women who are sexually
active, not pregnant, able
to become pregnant, do
not want to become
pregnant, and are not
using any contraceptive
method are considered to
have unmet need for
contraception.
MICS3
2005
DHS 2007
Women who are sexually
active (age 15-49), want to
postpone their next birth or
want to stop childbearing ,
and are not
using any contraceptive
method are considered to
have unmet need for
contraception.
Currently married fecund women who want to
postpone their next birth for two or more years or
who want to stop childbearing altogether but are
not using a contraceptive method are considered
to have an unmet need for family planning.
Pregnant women are considered to have an
unmet need for spacing or limiting if their
pregnancy was mistimed or unwanted. Similarly,
amenorrheic women who are not using family
planning and whose last birth was mistimed are
considered to have an unmet need for spacing,
and those whose last child was unwanted
have an unmet need for limiting.
Definition used by international agency for MDG
Women with unmet need are those who are fecund and sexually active but are not using any method of contraception, and
report not wanting any more children or wanting to delay the next child. The concept of unmet need points to the gap
between women's reproductive intentions and their contraceptive behaviour. For MDG monitoring, unmet need is expressed
as a percentage based on women who are married or in a consensual union.
5.4 Adolescent birth rate
Comparison of national and international
data
Data available
at UN
Population Division
National data
(Registration UNSD &
(SSCU)
WPP-SSCU
WPP2008)
Year
Data
Estimates
Year
1990
0,4
59,5
1990
59,1
1991
0,6
60,9
1991
60,3
1992
0,4
60,9
1992
60,5
1993
0,2
58,6
1993
58,4
1994
-0,2
56,8
1994
57,0
1995
-0,8
54,3
1995
55,1
1996
-1,4
50,1
1996
51,5
1997
1997
46,2
1998
-1,2
40,3
1998
41,5
1999
1999
35,0
2000
2000
32,1
2001
0,3
29,5
2001
29,2
2002
0,7
29,9
2002
29,2
2003
0,6
29,6
2003
29,0
2004
0,3
29,9
2004
29,6
2005
0
28,6
2005
28,6
2006
-0,3
29,2
2006
29,5
2007
-0,4
29,9
2007
30,3
2008
2008
32,0
2009
2009
31,2
Conclusion
5.3 Contraceptive prevalence rate
5.6 Unmet need for family planning
Data sources are the same
for National and International
level :
RHS, MICS, DHS
1. The use of different denominators
when calculating the ratio
2. The inclusion of births to women
under 15 years of age
5.4 Adolescent birth rate
THANKS FOR YOUR
ATTENTION!