e-e-, gamma-gamma and e-gamma options for a Linear Collider A.De Roeck CERN Amsterdam, April 2003
Download
Report
Transcript e-e-, gamma-gamma and e-gamma options for a Linear Collider A.De Roeck CERN Amsterdam, April 2003
e-e-, gamma-gamma and e-gamma
options for a Linear Collider
A.De Roeck
CERN
Amsterdam, April 2003
1
In this study
• Gamma-gamma and e-gamma option
– Working group on gamma-gamma/e-gamma collider technology
K. Moenig and V. Telnov
– Working group on gamma-gamma physics
M. Kraemer, M. Krawczyk, S. Maxfield, ADR, (S. SoldnerRembold)
• 4+2 meetings during this study
• During ECFA/DESY, integrated with other physics groups/
worked well!
• Many new results
• e-e- option
– No new studies in the context of this workshop/ 2 meetings St
Malo/Amsterdam
C. Heusch
• Will remind some key issues based on Snowmass/Jeju reports
2
e-e-option
Advantages of e-e-:
Large polarization for both beams: eL,eR
Exotic quantum numbers (H--)
Larger sensitivity in some processes
Some very clean processes
Sensitivity to contact
interactions
No s-channel, lower luminosity
Non-Commutative QED
…Majorana neutrinos
3
e-e- option
Higgs production
Supersymmetry
CP viol.
phases
But: No detector simulation, IR, beamstrahlung, selectron width…
4
e-e- option
Parameters (Snowmass 2001)
Study for TESLA (S. Schreiber)
Luminosity 5-(10)•1033 cm-2 s-1
L e-e- = 1/6 –(1/3) L e+eStability ~OK with intra-train feedback system
5
e-e- option
S. Schreiber
No major changes
required in IP
or accelerator
Future control room at the FLC??
e-e- is the option
which will be most
easily to realize
(for TESLA)
Has to be kept
on the roadmap
6
Gamma-gamma and e-gamma
Compton backscattering on laser photons
Needs second interaction point
Needs crossing angle
Peaked but smeared spectrum
Hence: needs extra effort
Is it worthwile?
Jeju panel discusion: Yes!
Examples of advantages
Higher cross sections for charg. particles
Different JPC state than in e+e Higgs s-channel produced
Higher mass reach in some scenarios
CP analysis opportunities
Can test precisely couplings to photons…
7
Gamma-gamma and e-gamma
• TESLA-TDR/ PLC workshop Hamburg 2000
Golden processes identified Starting point in Krakow
Only light Higgsbb and QCD processes simulated (simplified)
• This study: Level of detail in as good as in e+e– SIMDET simulation for more golden processes
• H WW, ZZ , Heavy MSSM H & A, WW production, Susy
– Cross checks/elaborate for key process Higgs bb
– Further opportunities: CP studies, Extra Dimensions, NC QED,..
– Real luminosity spectra/polarization used (CIRCE, CompAZ)
– B search using ZVTOP
– Adding overlap events
– QCD backgrounds in NLO
– QCD Monte Carlo tuning to existing data
• Direct contact & exchange with the US studies/exchange tools
8
Gamma-gamma and e-gamma
• Backgrounds and Luminosity
– Luminosity/polarisation measurement (& corresponding
syst.)
– Background studies (pairs, photons, neutrons)
– Evaluate design of IP/Mask/vertex detectors
• Technology
– R&D efforts in Europe and the US
9
Golden Processes
hep-ph/0103090
Higgs
SUSY
N
T
O
D
W
R
Tril/quart.
Top
QCD
Being done or ready: should be ready for the writeup
promised
10
Golden Processes
Added at/since the Krakow meeting:
Non-commutative QED
e for ED’s
Light gravitinos
Radions
Gluino production
H
(US groups)
HH+H- (US groups)
CP analyses in the Higgs sector
More (as yet uncovered/lower priority at present)
ee*
Leptoquarks
Strong WW scattering
eeH
As always: still room for volunteers (next workshop)
11
Gamma-gamma and e-gamma
On our group web page…
Information on lumi spectra, special SIMDET version, background…
12
Luminosity Spectra
TDR parameters
Luminosities files with PHOCOL (V. Telnov)
Can be used via CIRCE (T. Ohl)
Analytical approximation COMPAZ (A. Zarnecki)
13
Luminosity Measurement
• Proposals
– ee ee () / not for J=0
– ee ee ()
– ee 4 leptons
• Precision ~0.1% (stat)
• For Higgs (J=0) e.g. ee ee
Moenig,Marfin,Telnov
For e collisions
- e e
- e eee
14
Monte Carlos & Tuning
SHERPA Generator (F. Kraus et al.)
•
Amegic & Wing
Tuning of the Monte Carlo models
via JETWEB (M. Wing)
Resolved
Direct
A tune for LC studies has been produced
15
Background studies
backgrounds studied for TESLA IP layout
Study beam related background
Moenig et al
1st layer
2nd layer…
# of QCD events overlapping now
under control ( 1 evt@ 200 GeV and
2.5 evts @500 GeV). All groups agree
(D. Asner, ADR, Telnov, Warsaw)
# of hits in the layers of the pixel
detector per bunch crossing
Incoherent pair production: essentially
the same as for e+e Coherent pair production: High!
but ok, similar to e+e same vertex detector as for e+e(Moenig,Sekaric)
Neutrons? Probably ok (V. Telnov)
16
QCD
QCD had been mostly studied --at detector level-- for the TDR
Not revisited this time
Exceptions (using new data)
Total cross section parametrizations
(Kwiecinski, Motyka,Timneanu) & (Pancheri, Grau, Godbole, ADR)
Structure functions PDFs
(Krawczyk et al.)
To be used in the Monte Carlo programs
18
Higgs
Heralded as THE
key measurement for
the gamma-gamma option
• From the TDR (Jikia, Soldner-Rembold)
• This workshop
– Study H bb, with realistic spectra, background, B-tagging efficiency,…
– Study H WW,ZZ
– Study model separation power
10
– Study spin of Higgs in H WW,ZZ
– Study CP properties of the Higgs
3
– Study MSSM Higgs (H,A): extend e+e- reach
– Study of the Charged Higgs (US)
250
350
19
SM Higgs analyses
P. Niezurawski
1 year/84 fb-1
Corrected inv. mass
Using NLO backgrounds (Jikia…)
Next question: Systematics…??
20
SM Higgs Analysis
A. Rosca
• Analysis of a second group
(Zeuthen)
– Taking into account the QCD radiative
corrections to the background process
(Pythia + NLO Xsec.) through a
reweighting procedure.
– Adopting a b-quark tagging algorithm
based on a neural network.
= 1.9%
L 80 fb-1 .
N sig 6018 events
N bkg 7111 events
21
SM Higgs: HWW,ZZ
A. Zarnecki
Simultaneous determination of the
Higgs Boson width and phase
H WW and H ZZ measurements
(full detector simulation)
/ = 3-10% MH< 350 GeV
22
SM Higgs Analysis
Warsaw
group
2HDM SM-like
versus SM
(Ginzburg et al.)
MHbb (GeV) 120
/ 1.8
Different masses
130 140 150 160
1.9
2.2
3.0
6.8
23
MSSM H/A Higgs
Extend the detailed analysis to H/A bb
P. Niezurawski
One year running and
s 500 GeV
A0 detectable for MA > 300 GeV
beyond the e+e- reach
24
MSSM H/A Higgs
e+e-
Study for
a e+e- collider
at 630 GeV
D.Asner/J.Gunion (LCWS02)
Extends e+e- reach
Need few years to close
the LHC wedge
European study in progress
25
Angular distributions in
hZZlljj and hWW4j
Higgs spin and parity
A. Zarnecki
D. Miller et al. hep-ph/0210077
Detector effects
are large, but
sensitivity left
26
CP studies via tt
R. Godbole et al.
hep-ph/021136 & LCWS02
Exciting possibility to
analyse CP structure of
the scalar
Construct combined
asymmetries from
intial lepton polarization
and decay lepton charge
Done with Compton spectra
Using COMPAZ reduces
sensitivity with factor 2
Needs detector simulation
27
Triple Gauge Couplings
Study WW eW
Includes detector simulation/3D fits
real
/parasitic
L
·10-4
·10-4
Ee= 450 GeV
∫Lt=110 fb-1
0.1%
E= 400 GeV
∫Lt=110 fb-1
0.1%
10 / 10 /
(9.9)
15 / 22/
(2.6)
6.7
6.0
Sekaric, Moenig
Bosovic, Anipko
Eee= 500 GeV
∫Lt=500 fb-1
3.1
4.3
sensitivity ~ proportional to the momentum of the particles involved in the
triple gauge boson vertex
Studies starting for quartic couplings in WW and WWZ I Marfin
Use of optimal variables F. Nagel et al.
28
Extra Dimensions
tt
ADD type extra dimensions
Sensitivity to mass Ms
P. Poulose
Realism reduces sensitivity: Ms=1.7 TeV to 1.4 TeV
=-1
see=
500 GeV
SM+2
SM-2
=+1
Ideal Compton spectrum
Ms
COMPAZ spectrum
Ms
30
Supersymmetry
Several analyses starting
Theoretical studies: gluinos
charginos
squarks
eslepton neutralino
Will be pursued up to the
detector level
Interesting but needs simulation
E.g.
Kraus, Wengler
Klasen, Berge
31
Technology
• Photon collider IP introduces new challenges
– Laser
– Optics
– Stability & control in the IP (1nm?) /length control in cavity
– Extraction line…
• Both Europe & US groups have and R&D effort.
– Europe: use a cavity to reduce laser power
– US: full power laser design
• US: laser commissioning 20 J pulses at 10 Hz / Full power next year
– interferometery for alignment
– ½ size focusing optics setup in lab
– beam-beam deflection feedback system study
– PC testbed at SLAC? Proposal under preparation
• Europe : study cavitiy option
– Make 1:9 size test cavity? Wait for funding/technology decision?
Funding is an issue to continue R&D!
32
Interferometric Alignment System
Testbed at LLNL
J. Gronberg
• Half-scale prototype of optics / alignment system to test
mirror quality and alignment scheme
– Optics and laser interferometer currently installed
33
Engineering Test Facility at SLC
Revive SLC and install beampipe with optics
to produce luminosity
30 GeV
Beam Energy
1100 / 50
DR x,y (m-rad)
1600 / 160
FF x,y (m-rad)
8 / 0.1 mm
x / y
0.1 – 1.0 mm
z
1500/55nm
x,y
6.0E9
N
34
G. Klemz
New
proposal
35
Conclusions
• Lot of activity on gamma-gamma during this workshop series
– Good balance found between gamma-gamma specific meetings and
integration with the other groups
• Good progress on tools/background etc, for gamma-gamma studies
• Many detailed studies
– The light Higgs results confirmed and extended / ~ 2%
– Higgs channels in WW,ZZ studied / ~ 3-10%
– H/A study confirms reach for high masses, beyond e+e– CP, Higgs spin etc studies starting
– Detailed study of the TGCs measurement competitive with e+e– First results on SUSY and Extra Dimensions/alternatives
explore during the continuation of the workshop
Confirms /e as an exciting option for a LC !
• Progress also with hardware plans (PC testbed/Berlin studies)
Big thanks to all participants, particularly the Warsaw and Zeuthen Groups
36