Transcript UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems Bonn, April 2005 Current situation in France concerning the National Emission Inventory System Jean-Pierre Fontelle Centre Interprofessionnel Technique d’Etudes de.

UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems
Bonn, April 2005
Current situation in France concerning the
National Emission Inventory System
Jean-Pierre Fontelle
Centre Interprofessionnel Technique d’Etudes de la Pollution Atmosphérique
7, cité Paradis – 75010 PARIS – www.citepa.org
Plan
Organisation
Planning
QA/QC plan
Inventory development
Improvements
Response to ERT comments
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
National emission inventory system
SNIEPA (Système National d’Inventaire des
Emissions de Polluants dans l’Atmosphère)
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
The single national inventory system covers all national air emission
inventories (ie for UN and EC purposes) and other national needs
The Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development (MEDD) is the
national authority responsible for managing this issue
CITEPA is responsible for inventory compilation for all source
categories, technical discussion with international organisations,
assists the MEDD in coordinating activities, provides facilities for
dissemination (Internet)
More details on National emission inventory system and methodologies
http://www.citepa.org/publications/Inventaires.htm#inv6
Various ministries and organisations (technical and research centres,
statistics institutes, professional organisations, etc.) are also involved
as data providers
Institutional arrangements are still under discussion to fulfil EC
and UNFCCC decisions
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
Statistics and other
sources of information
UN and EC
specifications
Overview of different steps
in national system
CITEPA
Terms of
reference
Archiving
Choice of
methodologies
Publication
www.citepa.org
Data
identification
Transmission to
UN and EC
Data collection
Archiving
Transmission to
national
authorities
Data treatment,
main results
Approval by
authorities
Approval by
Committee
Action plan
implementation
Final reports and
products
Multiple
organis.
National
authority
International
review
Overview of inventory planning
Inventory planning for 2005 submission
Date / deadline
15/04/2005
15/03/2005
20/02/2005
10/02/2005
31/01/2005
15/01/2005
10/01/2005
mid/12/2004
December 2004
early/12/2004
Item
National Inventory report
National Inventory report
NIR final version delivery
Approval from National Authority
Final draft NIR
Main features for National Inventory report (CRF tables
and part of NIR)
Main features for National Inventory report (CRF tables
and part of NIR)
Comments from Coordination Committee
Coordination and Information Committee on Inventories
Meeting
National Authority
EC
National Authority
X
Coordination and
Information Committee
on Inventories
Final draft inventory and main related information on
changes, uncertainty, etc.
Calculations, checks, reporting
mid/11/2004
Deadline for data compilation
October 2004
Centralized Review of inventory by the ERT
September 2004
Coordination and Information Committee on Inventories
From May to November Data collection, data treatment, checks,
April 2004
Coordination and Information Committee on Inventories
Review of inventory improvement plan
mid/12/2003
Outputs from Coordination Committee
Product delivery
Input in the system
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
To
UNFCCC
EC
National Authority
X
X
Meeting
Overview of main features of QA/QC plan
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
Inventory compilation based on processus and procedures driven by a
quality management system (QMS)
QA/QC is operational and implemented through a QMS (CITEPA is
certified ISO 9001 version 2000 for emission inventories)
The QA/QC plan focuses on improvements on an ongoing basis,
especially by reducing uncertainties, by covering more substances,
both in a convenient and efficient way
QA/QC plan developped according to QMS rules (ISO 9001) and
includes sections on :
quality objectives,
quality control,
quality assurance,
overview of process, procedures and recording related to GPG
Documentation, archiving : stringent requirements in QMS to trace all
information (including origin, primary data, assumptions, etc.) and all
intermediate and final results
Implementation of GPG requirements within the Management Quality System - extract
QC activities
Procedures
1
Check that assumptions and criteria
for the selection of activity data and
emission factors are documented.
1a
2
Check for transcription errors in
data input and reference
2a
4a
Check that parameter and emission
units are correctly recorded and that
appropriate conversion factors are
used.
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
4
5
4b
Check that conversion factors are correct.
4d
Check that temporal and spatial adjustment
factors are used correctly.
5a
Confirm that the appropriate data processing
steps are correctly represented in the database.
5b
Confirm that data relationships are correctly
represented in the database.
5c
5d
Check for consistency in data
between source categories.
6a
7a
7
Check that units are correctly carried through
from beginning to end of calculations
4c
Check the integrity of database files.
6
Cross-check descriptions of activity data and
emission factors with information on source
categories and ensure that these are properly
recorded and archived
Confirm that bibliographical data references
are properly cited in the internal
documentation.
Check that units are properly labelled in
calculation sheets.
Check that the movement of
inventory data among processing
steps is correct.
7b
Process
codes
Procedures
Records
INV-Pr-04
INV-Mo-40-02 + INV-Mo40-03
FM (INV-En-403-01)
INV-Pr-04
INV-Mo-40-03
FM (INV-En-403-01)
INV-Pr-04
INV-Mo-40-03
INV-En-403-04 (fiche de
contrôle)
CIT-Pr-06
CIT-Mo-60-01
CIT-En-60101contrôle_applicatifs,
cahier des charges + revues
Ensure that data fields are properly labelled
and have the correct design specifications
Ensure that adequate documentation of
database and model structure and operation
are archived
Identify parameters (e.g. activity data,
constants) that are common to multiple source
categories and confirm that there is
consistency in the values used for these
parameters in the emissions calculations.
Check that emissions data are correctly
aggregated from lower reporting levels to
higher reporting levels when preparing
summaries.
Check that emissions data are correctly
transcribed between different intermediate
products.
Fi-SNAP (CIT-En-400-02),
références des fiches
(version des FM communes
utilisées) cf. FM (INV-En-40301)
INV-Pr-04
INV-Pr-07
INV-Mo-70-03
INV-En-703-02
controle_requete
INV-Pr-07
INV-Mo-70-03
INV-En-703-02
controle_requete
INV-Pr-08
INV-Mo-80-01
INV-En-801-03 et 04
Quality control
QC procedures are applied to all input data including those
provided by statistics institutes or administrations
Priority is focussed on non validated data vs official data
Checks on input data enables a high level of reliability more than an
accurate assessment of absolute values
Common QC procedures compatible with IPCC good practices are
applied to the different stages in the processes
Example :
documentation, assumptions, primary calculations are compiled
within « methodology files »
the national inventory system includes approximatively 140 files
which cover the SNAP activities (some files deal with several SNAP
codes).
Some data (activity rates, emission factors, etc. are common to
several files. Mapping these files makes it possible to check
interlinked consistency
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
CALCULATION FILES CHECK
CITEPA
N° SNAP 97
Centre Interprofessionnel Technique d'Etudes de la Pollution Atmosphérique
10, rue du Faubourg Poissonnière - 75010 PARIS
Téléphone : +33 01 44 83 68 83 - Télécopie : +33 01 40 22 04 83
040625
SUIVI et CONTRÔLE des FICHES METHODOLOGIQUES
e-mail : [email protected]
Fiches
Responsable
Date d'intervention
FICHE METHODOLOGIQUE POUR
INVENTAIRES
D'EMISSIONS
Validation méthode
ACTIVITES :
Support: Note
Validation externe
sucre.xls
Référence du fichier :
Experts
Nom
040625
Date
Clients
Support
Nom
Date
Support
Production de sucre
QA
External Method CHECK
Suivi des contrôles interne
Nom
Date
Description sommaire, commentaire
si nécessaire,....
OK
Verificateur
AC (si nécessaire, par défaut cf. FM papier)
Nom
Date
(O/ N)
(O/ N)
Cette activité ne traite que les émissions de poussières liées à la fabrication de sucre.
Orthographe/ syntaxe
Ce code SNAP n'existe pas dans la version SNAP 97.
Il est ajouté à la listeRespect
de façondes
arbitraire
par le CITEPA pour pouvoir prendre en compte cette activité émettrice
consignes
de poussières.
Validation méthode
transparence
QC
Date
24/10/2003
25/09/2002
07/12/2001
Auteur
NeA
cohérence
Nature de la modification
CITEPA
Method
and data
CHECK
Correction année 2001 disponible -2002 à 2020: report 2001;
exactitude
vérification années 1997 à 2000
GG
Ajout année 2001 (report 2000); correction activité 2000
comparabilité
NeA
Création de la fiche - PM années 1990 à 2000
Données
2000: report année 1999 car statistique non disponible au 5/12/01
unités
OK
Approbateur
AC (si nécessaire, par défaut cf. FM papier)
Orthographe/ syntaxe
Respect des consignes
Validation méthode
transparence
Relecteurs
cohérence
V-SS A-JPC
exactitude
comparabilité
JPC
Données
unités
tendance
tendance
Modules de calculs
Modules de calculs
Autre
Autre
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
CITEPA
CHECK SHEET
Method
and data
CHECK
LCP
CARTOGRAPHIE
DESBETWEEN
FICHES METHODOLOGIQUES
LIEES
INPUT / OUTPUT
MAPPING
METHODOLOGY
FILES
(sorties des FM --> éléments d'entrée d'une autre FM)
GIC
ELEMENTS
Granulo_PM
CARFUEL
GENERAL
GENERAUX
Para-socio
GICFUEL
ELEC
CHAUFURB
Dtom-elec
ENG_res
CIMENT
Al1-2
VERRE
Ceramic
SIDERUR
Tuil-bri
CHAUX
Magnesium
PbZn1
Ni
Maritim
PbZn2
Fonte
Traffluv
Conso_NP
RES_TER
COMB_IND
RAFFGEN
RAFFXX
ENERGY
AG_FO_AQ
ENERGIE
PARCAUTO
Petits bateaux
F-train
TraitEaux
Routier
Route-pneu-frein
PROCEDES INDUSTRIELS
INDUS.
PROC.
Route_usure
Aviation
WASTE
TRANSPORTS
TRANSPORTS
DECHETS
N2O-agr
Culture
Pharma-dom
Elevage
Solvants-dom
LUC2
LUC3
N2O-agr-DT
AGRICULTURE
LUC1
Peinture
Nettoyage-à-sec
AGRICULTURE
Dégraissage
LUC
POP-UNECE
SOLVENTSSOLVANTS
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
Chaussures
F-pain
Tabac
BIOTIQUE
BIOGENIC
OTHER
AUTRES
Quality control
IPCC Tier 1 requirements implemented through QMS procedures
QC checks : conducted by CITEPA and upstream compilation by
statistics offices, administrations, etc. and by some experts
depending on data and priorities (key sources)
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
Annual process cycle based on automatic and manual procedures
Examples of main check types :
Main methods
Plausibility,
reference range
Exhaustivity of data (activity rates,
emission factors, documentation, etc.)
check list
Accuracy of calculation
simulation
Comparability of estimation methods
with guidelines (UNFCCC, IPCC, EMEP/
CORINAIR, EC, WBCSD, etc.)
analysis and reference
Trends in activity rates, emission
factors, emissions
analysis, statistical
treatment
Consistency
cross-checking
Quality assurance
Procedures in place : CCIIE (Coordination and Information Committee
on Emission Inventories) + international review (UNFCCC) + external
experts (for some activities)
Other complete external reviews are expected but not yet
implemented because of resources needed but not available
An action plan is progressively drawn up over time from :
• decisions taken at recent CCIIE meetings,
• events occurring during the current year,
Action plan
• changes and improvements following remarks from reviews, errors,
new information available
and approved / delayed / rejected by the CCIIE
Every year, final statement by early December (data sent before
31st December N+1, reports available within January / March N+2
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
Inventory development
Goals : satisfy terms of reference including specifications such as
UNFCCC guidelines and GPG, EC recommandations
QMS procedures are applied to continuously improve the inventory
(and the system)
CURRENT PERCENTAGE OF TIER LEVELS (ABSOLUTE LEVEL 2003)
90 % of 42 key sources are estimated from Tier 2 or more
methods
82 % of key sources emission are estimated from Tier 2 or
more methods
CURRENT PERCENTAGE OF TIER LEVELS (TREND 1990 – 2003)
90 % of 54 key sources are estimated from Tier 2 methods or
more
93 % of key sources contribution are estimated from Tier 2
methods or more
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
Inventory development - improvements 1 / 3
1.
Identification of improvement areas
Topics previously delayed,
Feedback from UNFCCC ERT and EU GHG MM checks,
Feedback from inventory compilers (ie. checks),
Feedback from inventory users,
Feedback from non GHG inventories (verification and use)
This input can be valuable by pointing out problems affecting
as well relevant items for GHG inventories
-> strong interest for a single inventory system
All feedbacks pointing out problems are registered within the
QMS (CITEPA is certified ISO 9001 version 2000 for emission
inventories)
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
Inventory development - improvements 2 / 3
2. Analysis of topics
Type of issue : estimation method, complementary information,
editorial, other,
Amount of emissions affected, impact on reference year,
indirect impacts,
Prioritization (see below)
Prioritization : IMPROVEMENT
IF :
• items identified by the ERT or other Authorities and / or,
• significant gap with GPG and guidelines and / or,
• existing alternative methodology significantly increasing accuracy,
AND METHODOLOGY APPLICABLE (data availability, delay for
implementation, acceptable cost)
OR ELSE :
• either the implementation is delayed or
• longer term actions (ie. Studies, new statistics, etc.) or rejected
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005
Inventory development - improvements 3 / 3
3. Proposal for modifications
Impacts of proposed changes (% of emissions
affected, impact on reference year),
Technical consequences (eg. on structural changes in the
SNIEPA – changes relating to reporting format),
Delay and possible implementing difficulties
Related documentation
April, September
4. Decision of CCIIE
& December
Full agreement,
Agreement with additional considerations,
Postponed actions,
Rejection
5. Implementation
According to decision (content and delay)
Respond to ERT comments
Differents steps :
Arrange availability of experts to respond during the review
period,
Provide explanations as quickly as possible (high priority),
Treat ERT comments as feedback in the improvement process
for the next inventory release,
ERT review report is carefully analysed,
Response is provided to UNFCCC through official authority,
Communication to EC for EU inventory reporting
UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems – Bonn, April 2005