ESCalate – the HEA Education Subject Centre: Sharing recent ESCalate resources on student learning including peer support schemes, e learning and internationalisation Dr Julie Anderson and.
Download ReportTranscript ESCalate – the HEA Education Subject Centre: Sharing recent ESCalate resources on student learning including peer support schemes, e learning and internationalisation Dr Julie Anderson and.
ESCalate – the HEA Education Subject Centre: Sharing recent ESCalate resources on student learning including peer support schemes, e learning and internationalisation Dr Julie Anderson and Dr Fiona Hyland UCET, 7 November 2008, Birmingham www.escalate.ac.uk Schedule for workshop today: • Yourselves – request brief introductions: name, institution, main work role, reason for attending, hope for this session (just a few moments each please) • Fiona and myself – outlining some of the centre’s work Fiona and Julie’s input • First half- Fiona: Internationalisation project including videopaper, peer support scheme…. • Second half – Julie: E learning resources from 2008 events, employability resources, ICS-HE pages and resources ( etc as appropriate) Brief overview of ESCalate, the Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Education ESCalate produces and disseminates resources for staff and students in HE and HE in FE including: • Education Studies, • Continuing Education, • Lifelong Learning, as well as of course Initial Teacher Education/ PGCE. Much of the school based ITE resources are found through the University of Cumbria pages… The HEA and other Subject Centres • The HEA has its own website as do all the Subject Centres ESCalate website – key source of information: • Online membership / registration • E-submission of funding bids • External Examiner online register • Online Expertise exchange • Online event registration • Automated book reviews, electronic bulletins and e newsletters ( as well as old fashioned paper!) • Reports, research findings, academic papers and evaluations – both paper and web based First year support through student mentoring • Ginny Saich, University of Stirling, UK [email protected] • Supported by ESCalate • Saich, G. (2008) Explicit first year support through university student mentoring, International Journal of Learning, 15 (10), pp 1-10. Research literature 1st year experience • High drop-out rate • 1st year crucial to academic success • Large student numbers can lead to depersonalisation • University organised peer support can: – help establish friendship groups – increase sense of belonging – increase academic confidence Methods • • • • Literature review On-line surveys of staff Follow-up interviews with staff Interviews with students Results • • • • 79 responses to the survey represented 57 HEIs 36 with peer mentoring scheme 21 no scheme • reasons for no scheme: lack of staff time, no ‘champion’ Establishing schemes • • • • • Participation is voluntary (74%) Mentors are UG in same department (71%) Paired by common modules (62%) 1 mentor to 1 mentee (40%) Mentors receive training (98%) A student view • “I think it’s a subject that probably students coming to university have no real concept of what it entails... why are we doing psychology?... why do we have to do these IT classes:… when do we actually start teaching and not just theorising? Someone who has the answers will probably calm a few fears and stop people from jumping ship at the end of their first module because they haven’t really understood the point” (undergraduate, female, year 2 student) Staff views • “The scheme produced the biggest increase in retention to date of any single retention activity” • “Demands on staff reduce as queries are addressed to their first year peers…” • “Amongst the 19 students who were mentored, we got a 89% pass rate, and against the 21 student who hadn’t been mentored but had asked to be mentored, we had a 67% pass rate” Conclusions • You need an allocated budget, support from senior management, a ‘champion’ and clear responsibilities for individuals • Sustainable schemes were linked with recurrent funding arising from effective evaluation strategies, efficient use of resource, enthusiastic staff and welltrained mentors • 89% of staff engaged with mentoring schemes would recommend them to colleagues (the rest, unsure) Views of staff and students, from a range of disciplines in UK Higher Education, on internationalisation in 2008 Dr Fiona Hyland, Dr Sheila Trahar, Dr Julie Anderson & Alison Dickens Funded by Higher Education Academy (HEA) and ESCalate www.escalate.ac.uk Aims To explore the perspectives of students and teaching staff on: • what the terms 'internationalisation', 'internationalising the curriculum', 'teaching and learning in an international landscape' mean to them, • the extent of internationalisation within their institution, • the effects of internationalisation on teaching and learning, • the challenges they have faced, and their successes, • how internationalisation could be developed further in their discipline and institution. Methods • 15 Focus groups in February to May 2008 • 5 locations with participants from across UK • Separate groups of international & home students • Topic guide Numbers of participants Staff International students Home students Birmingham 7 2 1 Bristol 3 6 8 7&5 2 0 London 6 4 1 York 7 5 3 Totals 31 19 13 Leicester The staff experience Challenges – participants said that some staff feel that: • teaching international students can sometimes be difficult and not always enjoyable, • having to change is not easy, • they do not always feel that have the necessary experience and qualifications beyond the UK, They don’t enjoy it ...they are usually very competent lecturers but they don’t enjoy it. They really do not enjoy it. And it seems ‘oh, they don’t understand what I’m saying, it takes so long to read through their work, they don’t participate in class, when they say something I don’t understand it’. All of those barriers to effective engagement are part of that management issue, of how do you manage it. (Staff) I know nothing • I know nothing. What I know is… Anglo American content … in all my knowledge… The students I teach aren’t in that tradition, and they do teach me a lot, they do inspire me and I learn a lot from my students and I hopefully always will … but in order for a lecturer to go beyond that is asking a huge amount from a lecturer… if we had a paradigm of an international lecturer, what would they be? They’d be multilingual, they’d be well travelled, they’ll have lived abroad in a number of different countries and worked abroad … they would know the theory and content of a number of different parts of the world … and how many of us around the world fit into that category? – very few. So it’s a huge demand on the lecturer here. (Staff) Just how arrogant am I being? Organising multicultural group work I wanted them to mix with other nationalities and I wanted them to become involved in people’s lives from other countries and to understand different expectations but I had to sit down and think ‘just exactly how arrogant am I being' because what right do I have to manipulate people in this way, what right do I have to assert my middle-class western values of ‘it will be good for you’ to go and talk to people from other countries… Just how arrogant am I being? (part 2) … when their comment was ‘look, we’ve only just arrived here, we’re struggling with language, we’re struggling with climate, with struggling with culture, we’re struggling with academic content, we’re struggling with referencing, we’re struggling with just learning to learn in the UK environment and actually you are not helping us by then adding yet another level of complexity by making us work with other people when perhaps really my own decision is, well perhaps I don’t want to do that’ and it really did leave me thinking maybe I’m satisfying my own interpretation of what an holistic education is, what a multi-cultural education is, what an international education is, rather than actually listening to the students. (Staff) Staff experience - their suggestions: • getting academics & other staff engaged • opportunities for staff to share experiences • more support • practical information & guidance • ‘It’s all our responsibilities’ • home students And finally… Full report to be published on the ESCalate website this autumn 2008 http://escalate.ac.uk/4967 [email protected] E Learning and other resources that may be of interest… • Intute • E portfolio • 2008 newsletter: e learning issue • ICS-HE • Employabilty online module/ resources • Student – incl. Student conference • April 20 09(B’ham) On line employability module A collaborative piece of work. It is: – Online course developed using Blackboard Learning System™ (Release 6). The Education version can be used in Web CT and on PCs too. – Adapted for education students. Two versions now, one for each discipline ( Physical science and ours). – An interactive course with personal study dimensions; could be supported by university staff – Student orientated It is: – Comprehensive: encompassing where the student is now in terms of their perception of their skills and experience and taking them forward to look at their possibilities – Task-based: a course of multiple parts, most subsections involve reflection or an appropriate small research activity. – Augmented by web resources, software, paperbased resources and potential for interactive discussion board. url link - http://escalate.ac.uk/2785 Contact us: • Individual staff details are available on the ESCalate Team page • General Enquiries - ESCalate@Bristol, • ESCalate University of Bristol Graduate School of Education 35 Berkeley Square Bristol BS8 1JA [email protected] Tel: 0117 331 4291 • ESCalate@Cumbria • For Initial Teacher Education (ITE) contact our colleagues at the University of Cumbria. • ESCalate ITECDLT The University of Cumbria Lancaster Campus Bowerham Road Lancaster LA1 3JD [email protected] Tel: 01524 385459