Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MAC CTRB Parameters Issues Date Submitted:

Download Report

Transcript Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: MAC CTRB Parameters Issues Date Submitted:

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:

MAC CTRB Parameters Issues

Date Submitted:

[9 July 2001]

Source:

[Mark E. Schrader] Company [Eastman Kodak Co.] Address [4545 E. River Rd., Rochester, NY 14650-0898] Voice:[+1.716.781.9561], FAX: [+1.716.781.9733], E-Mail:[[email protected]]

Re:

[IEEE 802.15.3 MAC]

Abstract:

QoS based Channel Time Request Block parameters are defined mathematically. Some issues and limits of the timing are defined and briefly discussed. QoS is shown to to simple from the PNC perspective when only allocated bandwidth is important..

Purpose:

Channel Time Request Block parameters toward building a QoS algorithm.

Notice:

This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.

Release:

The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

Submission Slide 1 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Document Overview

• Propose the smallest set (3) of Channel Time Request Block (CTRB) parameters usable for QoS-based requests.

• Define the parameters mathematically with variables that are usable by the channel time requestor. • Identify issues and solutions.

Submission Slide 2 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Variable Definitions

1)f d = bits per second of delivered data.

2)N B = bits of source buffer available to store the data to be communicated.

3)N MPDU of data.

= bits of the data portion of one packet 4)N OH = Equivalent bits of overhead of one packet of data including: actual MAC header bits, slot guard times, PHY or PLCP overhead, etc., everything-but-data, etc. It simplifies the explanation to express this as an equivalent number of bits.

Submission Slide 3 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001

Definitions Continued

IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

• N E = Channel (PHY) encoding, bits per symbol • f s = Channel symbol rate, symbols per second.

• T bcn = Beacon Period Submission Slide 4 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001

CTRB Parameter 1: Allocation Period, T

AP IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

3) T AP = N B / f d 4) This is how often the N B buffer must be sent to get the desired delivered data rate f d .

5) This is the size of the source buffer divided by the desired data rate.

Submission Slide 5 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Relationships I

• We need to send N P packets over the network in order to transmit one buffer: • N P = N B / N MPDU simplicity.

Assume an integer for • N

T

= N MPDU + N OH , the total number of symbols that would have to be sent over the network to cover both the data and the overhead.

Submission Slide 6 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

CTRB Parameter 2: GTS Time Per Allocation Period, T

GTS

• T GTS is the total time requested for GTS allocated in order to send one buffer of data.

• T GTS = ( N P N T / N E • For the sending N P f S ).

• of equivalent size, N packets, T = ( N MPDU + N OH ) • with a PHY encoding of N E bits per symbol • and a PHY symbol rate of f S .

Submission Slide 7 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Relationships 2

• • • 1 / N E f S is a constant as long as the symbol rate and encoding method is unchanged.

From before: N P = N B / N MPDU Stating the obvious: N T and N P will also be constants if the transmit packet size and the transmit buffer size both remain constant.

Submission Slide 8 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

CTRB Parameter 3: Maximum Allocation Delay, T

MAD

• T MAD defines an allowable time jitter to the allocation of time slots by the piconet coordinator, PNC.

• The maximum allocation delay starts before the end of the allocation period, but does not affect the PNC’s reference timing of the T AP period. It allows some variability in position of the GTS slot(s)..

Submission Slide 9 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

The T

GTS

(blue) time is the total amount of slot time that must be allocated by the PNC within the T

MAD

(green) time centered around the start of the T

AP

interval (vertical arrows).

T AP T MAD ½T MAD ½T MAD T MAD

Submission

T GTS

Slide 10 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Possible PNC Slot Allocations

Submission

T MAD T AP

Slide 11 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Proposed Fragmentation Policy

• The PNC shall provide the GTS time in as few time slots as possible. The PNC may provide more GTS time than the amount requested.

• The PNC shall create at least one slot for each distinct channel time request.

Submission Slide 12 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Proposed CTRB Structure

Submission Slide 13 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Proposed CTRB Structure

Octets: 1 Target Address 1 EPS status 1 1 EPS Set Stream index 2 Allocation Period 2 Minimum GTS Time 2 Maximum Allocation Delay

CTRB field that exists in draft D0.8

CTRB field proposed in this proposal CTRB field proposed in document 01/485 Submission Slide 14 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Submission

Appendix 1

Comments and Issues

Slide 15 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Issue 1: QoS Restrictions to Allocation

• This is ISOC slot specification. • A request for a fixed offset from the beacon for low power devices, etc., will require different additional parameters to indicate that the time slot position is guaranteed with respect to the beacon.

• If a QoS request defined both the a fixed delay from the beacon and a fixed rate, it would set the beacon period. Should this “super QoS” mode be allowed?

Submission Slide 16 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

T

MAD

and the Beacon

• If T MAD > T BCN + T GTS then the beacon will never interfere with the allocation of time slots • If T MAD is smaller than this interval, then the following slides apply.

Submission Slide 17 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Issue 2: Beacon & CAP Delays

• Any PNC QoS strategy must take into account accommodating the beacon/CAP. The occurrence of the beacon plus the CAP could delay some or all of a member’s ISOC time slots beyond the requested interval, T AP .

• The PNC must be able guarantee a limit to the size of the beacon and the CAP or QoS policies will breakdown.

Submission Slide 18 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

The Beacon May Upset the timing of ISOC Slots

T AP T MAD

Delayed Interval

Alternative 1 Start of T AP Beacon Alternative 2 Start of T AP

Submission Slide 19 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

T

AP

Adjustment to Beacon Delay

• How should the TAP be adjusted if the beacon forces the slot allocation to be late. Should the next allocation be early according to the current TAP interval (Alternative 1), or should it be late and sync off the most recent slot allocation (blue) (Alternative 2)?

• The user could specify which alternative to use if we defined the QoS parameter switch.

Submission Slide 20 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Submission

Appendix 2

Data Rate Driven QoS

Slide 21 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.

Nov. 12, 2001 IEEE 802.15-01/328r3

Requirements for Data Rate Only QoS

• The transmit buffer is large enough to accept GTS slots anywhere in the superframe.

• The amount of bandwidth only depends on the data rate required f d , the data rate available, and the amount of overhead.

• T AP / T GTS = ( f d / f s ) / ( N T / N E N MPDU ) • Define T MAD = 0xFFFF, which will be a special value indicating “anywhere in CFP”. Submission Slide 22 Mark E. Schrader, Eastman Kodak Co.