Probing Cosmic Evolution with the Most Distant Quasars Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona Apr 18, 2010 Collaborators: Jiang, Carilli, Kurk, Rix, Strauss, Vestergaard, Walter, Wang Background: 46,420
Download ReportTranscript Probing Cosmic Evolution with the Most Distant Quasars Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona Apr 18, 2010 Collaborators: Jiang, Carilli, Kurk, Rix, Strauss, Vestergaard, Walter, Wang Background: 46,420
Probing Cosmic Evolution with the Most Distant Quasars Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona Apr 18, 2010 Collaborators: Jiang, Carilli, Kurk, Rix, Strauss, Vestergaard, Walter, Wang Background: 46,420 Quasars from the SDSS Data Release Three 46,420 Quasars from the SDSS Data Release Three 5 Ly forest 3 Ly 2 CIV redshift CIII MgII FeII 1 FeII OIII H 0 4000 A wavelength 9000 A Almost 50 Years Ago: First Quasar: 3C 273 by Maarten Schmidt Quest to the Highest Redshift Quest to the Highest Redshift 090423 080913 050904 000131 GRBs 970228 30 at z>6 60 at z>5.5 >100 at z>5 z~6: Crucial Transition in quasar evolution • Evolution of quasar density and accretion rate: – Formation of the first billion solar mass BHs? • Dust-free quasars – Connection to the earliest galaxies? • Gas and star formation in host galaxies – Evolution of M-σ relation? • Evolution of IGM neutral fraction – End of reionization epoch? Theorists Tell us • These luminous z~6 quasars: – The most massive system in early Universe – Living in the densest environment – BH accreting at Eddington – Host galaxies have ULIRG properties with maximum starburst Li et al. 2007 Quasar Evolution at z~6 • • • Strong density evolution – Density declines by a factor of ~40 from between z~2.5 and z~6 Black hole mass measurements – MBH~109-10 Msun – Mhalo ~ 1012-13 Msun – rare, 5-6 sigma peaks at z~6 (density of 1 per Gpc3) Quasars accreting at maximum rate – Quasar luminosity consistent with Eddington limit Low-z z~6 Fan et al. 2006, 2010 Puzzle 1: Are there luminous quasars at z>>7 • Black Holes do not grow arbitrarily fast – Accretion onto BHs dicitated by Eddington Limit – E-folding time of maximum supermassive BH growth: 40 Myr – At z=7: age of the universe: 800 Myr = maximum 20 e-folding • Billion solar mass BH at z>7 • Non-stop, maximum accretion from 100 solar mass BHs at z=15 (collapse of first stars in the Universe) • Theoretically difficult for formation of z>7 billion solar mass BHs • What if we find them: – Direct collapse of “intermediate” mass BHs? – More efficient accretion model “super-Eddington”? Puzzle 2: non-evolution of quasar (black hole) emission z~6 composite Low-z composite Ly a NV Ly a forest OI SiIV XF et al. 2010 • • • Jiang, XF et al. 2008 Rapid chemical enrichment in quasar vicinity Quasar env has supersolar metallicity : no metallicity evolution High-z quasars are old, not yet first quasars, and live in metally enriched env similar to centers of massive galaxies When did the first quasar form? Dust: emitting in infrared radiation from X-ray to radio as a result of black hole accretion and growth Disappearance of Dust Torus at z~6? typical J0005 3.5m 4.8m 5.6m 8.0m 16m 24m • quasars with no hot dust • Spitzer SEDs consistent with disk continuum only • No similar objects known at low-z • no enough time to form hot dust tori? Or formed in metal-free environment? Jiang, XF et al. 2010 Epoch of first quasars? Dust/Bolometric Dust-free quasars: Dust/Bolometric • Only at the highest redshift • With the smallest BH mass • First generation supermassive BHs from metal-free environment? • How are they related to PopIII? BH mass Jiang, XF et al. 2010 High-redshift quasars live in the center of star-forming galaxies CO • J1148 (z=6.42) - Spatially resolved CO and [CII] emissions: – Size: ~1.5 kpc – Star formation rate of: ~1000 Msunyr-1kpc-2 • theoretically close to maximum star formation rate ? • Gas supply exhaused over a few tdyn – Similar SF intensity to the brightest local starburst (Arp 200) but 100 times larger! 1kpc Walter et al. 2004 J1148 (z=6.42): •CO line width ~300 km/s •Dynamical mass ~1011Msun? •BH formed earlier than completion of galaxy assembly? Walter et al. 2009 reionization Two Key Constraints: 1. WMAP 5-yr: zreion=11+/-3 2. IGM transmission: zreion > 6 From Avi Loeb First detection of Gunn-Peterson Effect Evolution of Lyman Absorptions at z=5-6 transparent opaque z = 0.15 Accelerated Evolution at z>5.7 • (1+z)11 • (1+z)4.5 Optical depth evolution accelerated – z<5.7: ~ (1+z)4.5 – z>5.7: ~ (1+z)>11 – > Order of magnitude increase in neutral fraction of the IGM End of Reionization Dispersion of optical depth also increased – Some line of sight have dark troughs as early as z~5.7 – But detectable flux in ~50% case at z>6 – XF et al. 2006 End of reionization is not uniform, but with large scatter Beyond Gunn-Peterson Optical Depth: HII Region Sizes zem • • • • Gunn-Peterson test saturates at z>6 Size of HII region Rs ~ (LQ tQ / fHI )1/3 HII region size decreases by ~ 3 from z=5.7 to 6.4 Best estimate: fHI ~ a few percent at z~6 Can be applied to higher z and fHI with lower S/N data Model uncertainties due to radiative transfer Carilli et al. 2010 HII region size • • z Probing Reionization History WMAP Roads ahead • Luminous quasars probe the evolution of the most massive systems in the early universe • Important changes were happening at z~6-7 – Timescale constraints on billion solar mass BH growth – Evidence of youngest quasar structure – End of reionization epoch with order of magnitude (or more?) increase in IGM neutral fraction – Discovery (or lack of ) z~7 quasars might reveal new surprises – Requires new generation of large IR sky surveys • Quasars and GRBs are complimentary probes to the peak of reionization epoch – GRB probes pristine, low mass galaxies and can reach high-z faster