“Machines that fit the human environment, instead of forcing humans to enter theirs, will make using a computer as refreshing as taking a walk.
Download
Report
Transcript “Machines that fit the human environment, instead of forcing humans to enter theirs, will make using a computer as refreshing as taking a walk.
“Machines that fit the human
environment, instead of forcing
humans to enter theirs, will make
using a computer as refreshing as
taking a walk in the woods.”
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
-- Mark Weiser
The Computer for the 21st Century
Calm Computing
Hari Khalsa
September 20, 2004
The Coming Age of Calm
Technology
By Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown, 1996
What has come before
Mainframe - many people share one computer
PC - one person, one computer
Internet - transition to ubiquitous computing
Calm Technology
Utilize a user’s periphery
Come to center only when necessary
Enhance peripheral reach to keep people tuned in to
surroundings without demanding attention
Examples
Inner office windows connect people to nearby world
Dangling string connects people to network usage
But why?
Unremarkable Computing
By Peter Tolmie, James Pycock, Tim Diggins, Allan MacLean
and Alain Karsenty, 2002
Making technology “invisible in use”
Routines
Done in the doing
Knocking on the door has a specific meaning at a specific time
Perceptual visibility and practical invisibility
Alarm clock going off at a specific time starts a routine
Clock has practical invisibility since no one thinks about the clock itself
Do not command attention unless necessary
Routines are calm and generally unspoken
Problems with current approaches
Perceptual invisibility vs. invisibility in use
Augmenting and adding semantics to tangible artifacts can confuse
Systems intended to support a routine must not ask the user to describe or
account for activities
Need more research to create actual designs
Seeing the Invisible
By Jeffrey Heer, Peter Khooshabeh
Invisibility in Use
Fades into the conceptual background
Work through tools rather than with them
Example: computer mouse
Often arises from learning and practice
Infrastructural Invisibility
Computation is embedded in environment
Ability of infrastructure to become tacit in thought and action
Interaction is less apparent
Example: plumbing and electrical systems
Invisibility is an experienced relationship between
humans and their tools, whether physical or conceptual
Calm vs. Invisible
Invisibility
Invisibility In use
Infrastructural / Perceptual Invisibility
“Calm” computing fits into both
Challenge: making ubiquitous computing calm
Systems that “encalm and inform” simultaneously
Questions and Discussion