Public Private Partnerships Introduction to PPPs Frederick J. Werner FHWA Resource Center Innovative Finance Team Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center.
Download
Report
Transcript Public Private Partnerships Introduction to PPPs Frederick J. Werner FHWA Resource Center Innovative Finance Team Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center.
Public Private Partnerships
Introduction to PPPs
Frederick J. Werner
FHWA Resource Center Innovative Finance Team
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Presentation Outline
What are PPPs?
Working definition
PPPs for existing, new and improved facilities
PPPs: Pros and Cons
Myths and facts about PPPs
The evolving US federal role
SAFETEA-LU innovative finance tools
Summary
2
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
What are PPPs?
Would anyone like to venture a guess?
Public component
Private component
Partnership component
3
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Working Definition
PPPs are a legally-enforceable contractual agreement
Between a public sector and a private sector entity
Designed to develop and deliver a surface transportation
project
Specific terms/provisions of contractual agreement can
and do vary widely
4
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Public Partner
Most commonly, the public partner is a state or provincial DOT
However, public partners can also include:
Local governments; highway and toll authorities
Port or bridge authorities; transit districts
Bi-state, multi-state or bi-national districts
5
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Private Partner
Most commonly, large engineering or investment
companies
However, private partners can also include:
• Combinations of firms (joint ventures or consortia)
• Individuals; groups of individuals
• Quasi-public corporations
6
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Partnership Arrangement
Can be structured as a simple contract; concession
agreement; letter of intent; memorandum of
understanding; hand-shake agreement (uncommon; for
small value transactions)
Can address one-time events such as donation of land for
ROW
Can address very long-term agreements whereby the
private sector builds and/or operates a transportation
facility
7
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Partnership Arrangement
Arrangement may specify a minimum of private sector
involvement, such as donation of land, a guaranty of public
sector debt, or a willingness to self-assess to finance an
improvement.
Arrangement may specify significant private sector
involvement, whereby private sector invests its equity capital –
cash on hand or borrowed funds – and agrees to design, build,
finance, operate and maintain a given facility.
Many variations on private involvement for existing and new
(“greenfield”) facilities, as well as significant improvements to
existing facilities.
8
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
PPPs for Existing Facilities
Long-term concession for Chicago Skyway, late 2004:
$1.83 billion payment for 99 year lease
Long-term concession for Indiana Toll Road, early 2006:
$3.85 billion payment for 75 year lease
9
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
PPPs for New Facilities
108 kilometer 407 ETR in Toronto
$630 million South Bay Expressway in San Diego
$3.2 billion Texas SH 130 in Austin
$2.5 billion Texas SH 121 in Dallas/Ft. Worth area (currently being
negotiated)
Mexico City North Bypass
10
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
PPPs for Significant Improvements
Significant improvements to rail infrastructure:
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern (DM&E) replaced rail on portion of 1100
mile system with $233 million US federal loan
DM&E plans to extend line 820 miles into Powder River Basin with
$2.5 billion US federal loan
Texas Mexico replaced several hundred miles of rail with $50 million
loan
11
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
PPP and Federal Credit
Many PPPs are supported through US federal credit programs:
TIFIA (Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation
Act)
RRIF (Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing
program)
PABs (Private Activity Bonds)
SIBs (State Infrastructure Banks)
12
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
PPPs: Pros and Cons
Deep pools of investment capital looking to invest in
assets for a very long period; funds looking for long-term
income to match long-term liabilities (Tim Romer,
Goldman Sachs).
Injection of equity capital to invest in other assets and
access to funding outside municipal bond market (Trent
Vichie, Macquarie Securities).
Transfer of project risk to private sector (Trent Vichie,
Macquarie Securities).
13
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
PPPs: Pros and Cons
Public perception that critical “public” assets are controlled by private sector,
often for very long periods, with related public safety and asset performance
concerns.
Need to charge user fees in environments and/or markets unaccustomed to
such charges (Caltrans).
Concern that PPP projects - especially those involving railroads and dedicated
truck lanes - properly protect the environment. “The real obstacle to many
PPP projects is not the politics, but environmental clearance” (Southern
California Association of Governments).
Need to fit PPP projects into coherent long-term state plans (Caltrans).
14
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Myths About PPPs
PPPs can solve all the nation’s infrastructure problems
Every project is a potential PPP
All PPPs will generate big financial rewards
The US is losing control of critical transportation assets
PPPs will replace the traditional federal-aid grant program
15
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Facts About PPPs
State/local governments face challenges:
•
Fiscal stress and budget deficits
•
Growing need for new infrastructure
•
Need to rehabilitate decaying existing infrastructure
Public and private sector can share benefits:
•
16
Project delivery vs. concession income
Public and private sector can share
(environmental, financing, construction)
project
risks
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
The Evolving Federal Role
Traditionally, the US federal
government has financed highways
through 80% grant programs
Pay-as-you-go approach
However, ISTEA, TEA-21 and SAFETEALU have provided alternative or
“innovative” forms of non-grant
assistance to advance projects
Goal is to leverage limited federal
resources from:
• Co-investment
• Revenue expansion
17
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
SAFETEA-LU Facilitates PPPs
Innovative Finance initiatives:
• Enhanced TIFIA credit program
–
Available for refinancings
–
Available for projects costing $50 million or more
• Continued RRIF credit program
• $15 billion in Private Activity Bond authority
• Expanded SIB authority
• Broader tolling authority on Interstates
• Expanded use of design-build provisions
18
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
FHWA Initiatives
Secretary Mineta’s National Congestion Strategy
• “Unleashing private-sector investment resources”
Use of SEP 15 waiving most federal-aid requirements on
a trial basis
Use of SEP 15 coupled with a streamlined TIFIA credit
application process
19
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Revolutionary Change in PPPs
PPPs have been successful for wide variety of projects
Increases in equity market capacity and competition;
domestic equity investors are joining international
investors in PPP market
Electronic toll technology is facilitating public’s acceptance
of user fees
GASB 34 (asset management) is changing traditional view
of highway construction from an “expense” to an
“investment”
PPPs are another important tool in our toolbox - if the
right conditions are met!
20
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
In Summary ………
Take advantage of changing US federal regulatory landscape
Leverage expertise of FHWA National Resource Center,
Innovative Finance Team
• Subject matter experts and solution providers
• Expansive view – across FHWA and other modal programs
• Broad view of needs – states, regions, nation, bi-national
projects
Contact Information: Prabhat Diksit 720-963-3202; Frederick
Werner 404-562-3680
Additional Information
• www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovative
• www.fhwa.dot.gov/ppp
21
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center
Conclusion
22
Federal Highway Administration-National Resource Center