Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People Marie desJardins ([email protected]) CMSC 691B April 24, 2006 Thanks to Rob Holte for permission to use some slides.
Download
Report
Transcript Presenting Your Research: Papers, Presentations, and People Marie desJardins ([email protected]) CMSC 691B April 24, 2006 Thanks to Rob Holte for permission to use some slides.
Presenting Your Research:
Papers, Presentations, and People
Marie desJardins
([email protected])
CMSC 691B
April 24, 2006
Thanks to Rob Holte for
permission to use some slides
Research Isn’t Just Research
Who cares what you do, if you never tell them?
You’ll need to present your ideas in various forms and
venues:
PEOPLE: Networking with colleagues at your institution and
elsewhere
PAPERS: Writing and submitting papers to workshops,
conferences, and journals
PRESENTATIONS: Giving talks at workshops, conferences,
and other institutions
(You should also put together a website that highlights
your interests and research activities)
…oh, and these things also provide useful experience for
job interviews, not to mention valuable job skills…
4/24/06
Marie desJardins -- Presenting Your Research
2
Paper Writing: Strategies
First, decide where you plan to submit the paper
You may not finish in time, but having a deadline is always helpful
Two to four months away is a good planning horizon
Next, decide what you will say
What are the key ideas? Have you developed them yet?
What are the key results? Have you designed and run the
experiments yet? Have you analyzed the data?
What is the key related work? Have you read the relevant
background material? Can you give a good summary of it?
Now get started on the work you need to do to fill in the
missing holes!
Write early and often: You can (and should) write in parallel with
finishing the work!
4/24/06
Marie desJardins -- Presenting Your Research
8
Paper Writing: Design
Abstract –summarizes the research contributions, not
the paper (i.e., it shouldn’t be an outline of the paper)
Introduction/motivation – what you’ve done and
why the reader should care, plus an outline of the paper
Technical sections – one or more sections summarizing
the research ideas you’ve developed
Experiments/results/analysis – one or more sections presenting
experimental results and/or supporting proofs
Future work – summary of where you’re headed next and open
questions still to be answered
Related work – sometimes comes after introduction, sometimes before
conclusions (depends to some extent on whether you’re building on
previous research, or dismissing it as irrelevant)
Conclusions – reminder of what you’ve said and why it’s important
4/24/06
Marie desJardins -- Presenting Your Research
9
Paper Writing: Tactics
Top-down design (outline) is very helpful
Bulleted lists can help you get past writer’s block
Unless you’re a really talented/experienced writer, you should use
these tools before you start writing prose
Neatness counts! Check spelling, grammar, consistency of
fonts and notation before showing it to anyone for review
If they’re concentrating on your typos, they
might miss what’s interesting about the content.
(More about the reviewer’s perspective later...)
Leave time for reviews!
Fellow students, collaborators, advisors, …
A paper is only done when it’s submitted... and usually not even
then.
4/24/06
Marie desJardins -- Presenting Your Research
10
Knowing Your Audience:
A Reviewer’s Perspective
First, I read the title: is it in my area? (self-selection)
Next, I read the abstract: is it interesting?
(self-selection)
Next, I skim the introduction and form
my opinion about the paper
Next, I read the rest of the paper
looking for evidence to support my view
By the time I get to Section 2, I already have a
very strong opinion about whether to accept or
reject.
Your job is to give me the evidence I need in the title
and abstract to select your paper for review, and in
the introduction to result in the right opinion!
4/24/06
Marie desJardins -- Presenting Your Research
18
Good Reviews Are...
Polite
Fair
Concise
Clear
Constructive
Specific
Well-documented
Represent the scientific community
... but you get what you get!
Bad, unfair review that missed the point?
Fix your paper anyway!
4/24/06
Marie desJardins -- Presenting Your Research
19
Rejected!! Now What?
Fix the paper!
4/24/06
Read the reviews, rail and complain, berate the reviewer
Calm down
Read them again with an open mind
Do more experiments, revise the paper, …
Go back to the reviews again – have you addressed all the points?
Have people read the revision critically
Do more experiments, revise the paper, …
Repeat until the next deadline
Marie desJardins -- Presenting Your Research
21
Some Useful Resources
Some useful resources:
Writing:
Lynn DuPre, Bugs in Writing
Strunk & White, Elements of Style
Giving talks:
Mark Hill, “Oral presentation advice”
Patrick Winston, “Some lecturing heuristics”
Simon L. Peyton Jones et al., “How to give a good research talk”
Dave Patterson, “How to have a bad career in research/academia”
These slides:
http://www.cs.umbc.edu/~mariedj/talks/presenting-research-dc-jul05.ppt
4/24/06
Marie desJardins -- Presenting Your Research
28