WFCAM Photometric Calibration Simon Hodgkin ++ 11/6/2015 Simon Hodgkin CASU Overview • Conversion from WFCAM counts to Vega magnitudes at airmass unity in the MKO-NIR system • The goal is.

Download Report

Transcript WFCAM Photometric Calibration Simon Hodgkin ++ 11/6/2015 Simon Hodgkin CASU Overview • Conversion from WFCAM counts to Vega magnitudes at airmass unity in the MKO-NIR system • The goal is.

WFCAM Photometric Calibration

Simon Hodgkin ++

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Overview

Conversion from WFCAM counts to Vega magnitudes at airmass unity in the MKO-NIR system

The goal is to achieve this to 2% accuracy (UKIDSS)

J = ZP J – J inst – k J ( Χ – 1)

strictly

k J = k J ’ + k J ’’ (J – K)

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Flies in the ointment

• • • • • •

spatial systematics

scattered light

• • •

flatfield errors variable pixel scale geometrical – vignetting/secondary reflectivity extinction colour dependence extinction time dependence chip-to-chip gain dependence chip-to-chip QE colour effects filter colour terms (4 filters)

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Scattered Light in WFI

WFI V-band observation of a Landolt standard field. Right hand panel shows the results of applying a quadratic correction term: Δmag = a ( ζ 2 + η 2 )

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Scattered Light in INT ?

Landolt field centred on each chip (chip#4 twice – offset for clarity)

Plot of distance from rotator centre with size of bar equal to delta magnitude

No evidence for systematic variation in delta-magnitude with spatial position.

Note that ESO WFI at CASS with multi element corrector, while INT WFC at prime with fewer reflections

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Primary Standards

• • • • • • JAC are observing standards with the Mauna Kea consortium filter set in UFTI (Simons and Tokunaga 2002, Tokunaga et al. 2002) >100 UKIRT standards with (JHK) MKO-NIR which will not saturate a 1s WFCAM exposure (about 50 for a 5s exp) http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/JACpublic/UKIRT/astronomy/calib/fs_izjhklm.dat

WFCAM uses the same JHK filter system Preliminary results show persistence effects are small (2e-4 after 20s) The UKIRT standards therefore make excellent primary standards for WFCAM Y,Z and narrow-band filters require extra work 4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Funny Filters

YZ define new

passbands YZ can be bootstrapped

into the Vega system Requires observations of primary standards over a wide range of

colours to define the ZP Can then tie secondary fields into the same

system Narrowband filters (H2, Br γ, CO) require observations of flux standards first

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

• • •

Secondary Standards

By defining standard fields we:

• • • • •

Beat down the noise Allow for variables Can measure spatial systematics Can measure colour-terms (can change) Calibrate 4 detectors simultaneously Choosing fields:

• • • •

Spaced every 2 hours in RA Equatorial (good for VISTA) δ=+20 degrees (X=1.0) Range of colours How many stars? 100s? 1000s?

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Initial Strategy

1.

2.

3.

• •

Observe UKIRT standards with each chip: Chip-to-chip gain Colour equations

Meso-step star field across array: Spatial systematics Begin programme to define secondary standards

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Long Term Strategy

Repeat measurements of secondary standard fields (>3 measurements per field)

Monitor spatial systematics (esp. as WFCAM comes off/on)

Monitor colour equations

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Nightly Calibration

• • •

Overheads

E.g. ( (3x5s) +20s ) x 5 filters + slew + acq

• •

5s S/N=100 J=15 (5 min total) 30s S/N=100 J=16 (11min total) Frequency

Depends on stability of a photometric night: hourly ? 2-hourly ?

Extinction

Do we measure it – nightly/hourly/at all ?

Or do we observe standards close to targets

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

1.

2.

3.

4.

Possible standard fields

Around UKIRT standards

• •

100s of stars, measured simul. with primary std Mostly red Near Galactic Plane (5h45+18, 7h15+00, 17h50+00, 20h30+18)

• •

1000s of stars, avoid worst crowding Mostly red Globular clusters (NGC5053, M3)

• •

Horizontal branch for blue stars Small, dense cores Open clusters (Pleiades, Praesepe)

• •

Numerous, large areal coverage Not many stars

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

NGC5053: 2MASS J

8 arcminutes

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

NGC5053 source counts

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

The Globular M3

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

M3 Source Counts

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Gal Plane: 1000 (red) stars

5h45m+18d (l=190, b=-6)

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Galactic Plane Field

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU

Pre-WFCAM observations?

How photometrically stable is MKO, e.g. with humidity?

How does extinction vary with time on a wet vs dry night?

Enough data to investigate this?

4/30/2020 Simon Hodgkin CASU