Forum on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Biomedical Engineering Education Stanford University Tom Andriacchi biodesign stanford university Three Courses Medical Device Design mission: promoteDesign* the innovation and implementation of new health technologies 1.
Download ReportTranscript Forum on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Biomedical Engineering Education Stanford University Tom Andriacchi biodesign stanford university Three Courses Medical Device Design mission: promoteDesign* the innovation and implementation of new health technologies 1.
Forum on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Biomedical Engineering Education Stanford University Tom Andriacchi biodesign stanford university Three Courses Medical Device Design mission: promoteDesign* the innovation and implementation of new health technologies 1. Medical Device ME 294 through interdisciplinary research and education a the emerging frontiers of 2. Biodesign Innovation* Med 274/374A,B engineering and the biomedical sciences. 3. Medical Device Design and Evaluation ME 392A,B technology domains: home biomaterials medical devices *NCIIA courses fundedbioMEMS modeling/simulation biomotion surgical robotics eventsRelationship: Concepts and Process biosensors, transducers minimally invasive techniques faculty design therapeutic delivery systems Image guidance tissue repair & replacement research contact biodesign.stanford.edu Course Description Courses are Project Based Project teams 3 or 4 students •Faculty Mentor Course Description 1. Medical Device Design (1 quarter) ME 294 Courses are ProjectUndergrad/graduate Based Introductory survey level •Project teams 3 or 4 students Mentor • Individual•Faculty “QuickStart” project • Team project Physician supplied needs Physician coached Novel methods •Design through prototyping •Hands-on, 3-D prototypes expected Course Description 1. Medical Device Design (1 quarter) ME 294 Courses ProjectUndergrad/graduate Based Introductory surveyare level 2. Biodesign Innovation (2 quarters) Med 274/374A,B •Project teams 3 or 4 students •• Graduate: Engineering, Business, Individual•Faculty “QuickStart” project Med. Law, Biosciences Mentor • 1st needs project assessment, brainstorming, concept • qtr: Team development, regulatory, Physician suppliedIPneeds Physician coached • 2nd qtr: financing, markets, business plans, ethics • Device prototype Novel Methods •Teams include (Bioinnovation Fellows) •“Innovator’s Workbench” interview series of renown Inventors Course Description 1. Medical Device Design (1 quarter) ME 294 Courses are Project Undergrad/graduate Based Introductory survey level 2. Biodesign Innovation (2 quarters) Med 274/374A,B •Project teams 3 or 4 students • Individual “QuickStart” project • 3.Graduate: Engineering, Business, Med. Law, Biosciences •Faculty Mentor • Team project Medical Device Design/Evaluation (2 quarters) E 382A,B • 1st•Graduate qtr: needs assessment, brainstorming, concept Physician supplied needs Level Engineering development, PhysicianIP coached •Real Worldregulatory, Projects Novel methods • 2nd qtr: financing, markets, business plans, ethics •Company Sponsored Design through prototyping • Device prototype •Single project for 2 quarters Hands-on, 3-D prototypes expected Novel Methods •Class Organized as company •Form Executive Committees – IP, Regulatory, Reliability, Tech Resources, Proj Manage, Design Review Total of 6 quarters Fellowship Program How do you measure outcomes? Grades Final Design/Report (verbal/written) Process and Content Other factors • Communications – Presentations – Project Team Conferences – Poster Presentation • Peer Review Stanford University Content Domains Medical Design Process Scientific Information Design Evaluation Design Principles Product Development Medical/Clinical Problems Biology Medical Design Process Biomaterials Engineering including Anatomy integrates Scientific Information Physiology Pathology should be applied to applies Biocompatibility requires must consider Is enhanced by Human Factors to solve precedes Intellectual Property including should consider Ethics Medical/Clinical Problems Quality Control FDA Regulations Product Development including Problem Solving Design Evaluation Communication Skills Design Principles Needs Finding requires Reliability testing must meet Medical Economics Industry Needs depends on often Manufacturing conflicts may need Resources with Entrepreneurship Biology Medical Design Process Biomaterials Engineering including Anatomy integrates Scientific Information Physiology Pathology should be applied to applies Biocompatibility requires must consider Human Factors Communication Skills to solve precedes Intellectual Property including should consider Ethics Medical/Clinical Problems Quality Control FDA Regulations Product Development including Problem Solving Design Evaluation Process Design Principles Needs Finding requires Reliability testing must meet Medical Economics Industry Needs depends on often Manufacturing conflicts may need Resources with Entrepreneurship Biology Medical Design Process Biomaterials Engineering including Anatomy Scientific Information Physiology Pathology should be applied to Design Principles Needs Finding Human Factors integrates applies Biocompatibility requires Content Depth to solve Intellectual Property including Product Development should consider Ethics Medical/Clinical Problems Quality Control FDA Regulations precedes Communication Skills including Problem Solving Design Evaluation must consider Is enhanced by requires Reliability testing must meet Medical Economics Industry Needs depends on often Manufacturing conflicts may need Resources with Entrepreneurship Biology Medical Design Process Biomaterials Engineering Anatomy Physiology Pathology including integrates Scientific Information 3. Medical should be applied to applies Biocompatibility requires must consider Communication Skills 1. Medical Device Design including to solve Intellectual Property including should consider must meet Medical Economics Industry Needs depends on 2. Biodesign Innovation often Ethics Medical/Clinical Problems Quality Control FDA Regulations Product Development Needs Finding Problem Solving Design Evaluation Is enhanced Device Design/Evaluation by precedes Design Principles Human Factors requires Reliability testing Manufacturing conflicts may need Resources with Entrepreneurship Example “best practices” Articulated Laparoscopic Surgical Devices Students: Kevin Fine David Miller Sven Newman Coach: ME294 Dr. Mark Vierra Stanford University Example “best practices” 2002 National Design Awards 1. Interventional Aortic Repair System Beverly Bangayan, Mariel Fabro and Rajan Pragash 2. Preclinical model for intraventricular therapy in congestive heart failure Ayo Anise, Stephen Meier, Sonar Shah 3. Posterior cruciate ligament function evaluator Eric Bean, Kai Jar, Lampros Kourtis, and Choongsoo Shin 4. Procedural steps and Instrumentation for minimally invasive gastric bypass surgery Mark Bly, Jen Cho,and Jen Lake 5. Prevention of deep venous thrombosis Justin Blanco, Abha Chinubhai, and Eric Tao, and Jay Yin 6. 3D graphical model of knee loading Ravi Nataraj, Mahesh Hardikar, Dave Camarillo, Sharonda Felton Thank You